Cargando…
Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study
BACKGROUND: Teacher feedback on student reflective writing is recommended to improve learners’ reflective competence. To be able to improve teacher feedback on reflective writing, it is essential to gain insight into which characteristics of written feedback stimulate students’ reflection processes....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23829790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-94 |
_version_ | 1782281427270762496 |
---|---|
author | Dekker, Hanke Schönrock-Adema, Johanna Snoek, Jos W van der Molen, Thys Cohen-Schotanus, Janke |
author_facet | Dekker, Hanke Schönrock-Adema, Johanna Snoek, Jos W van der Molen, Thys Cohen-Schotanus, Janke |
author_sort | Dekker, Hanke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Teacher feedback on student reflective writing is recommended to improve learners’ reflective competence. To be able to improve teacher feedback on reflective writing, it is essential to gain insight into which characteristics of written feedback stimulate students’ reflection processes. Therefore, we investigated (1) which characteristics can be distinguished in written feedback comments on reflective writing and (2) which of these characteristics are perceived to stimulate students’ reflection processes. METHODS: We investigated written feedback comments from forty-three teachers on their students’ reflective essays. In Study 1, twenty-three medical educators grouped the comments into distinct categories. We used Multiple Correspondence Analysis to determine dimensions in the set of comments. In Study 2, another group of twenty-one medical educators individually judged whether the comments stimulated reflection by rating them on a five-point scale. We used t-tests to investigate whether comments classified as stimulating and not stimulating reflection differed in their scores on the dimensions. RESULTS: Our results showed that characteristics of written feedback comments can be described in three dimensions: format of the feedback (phrased as statement versus question), focus of the feedback (related to the levels of students’ reflections) and tone of the feedback (positive versus negative). Furthermore, comments phrased as a question and in a positive tone were judged as stimulating reflection more than comments at the opposite side of those dimensions (t = (14.5) = 6.48; p = < .001 and t = (15) = −1.80; p < .10 respectively). The effect sizes were large for format of the feedback comment (r = .86) and medium for tone of the feedback comment (r = .42). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that written feedback comments on students’ reflective essays should be formulated as a question, positive in tone and tailored to the individual student’s reflective level in order to stimulate students to reflect on a slightly higher level. Further research is needed to examine whether incorporating these characteristics into teacher training helps to improve the quality of written feedback comments on reflective writing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3750500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37505002013-08-24 Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study Dekker, Hanke Schönrock-Adema, Johanna Snoek, Jos W van der Molen, Thys Cohen-Schotanus, Janke BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Teacher feedback on student reflective writing is recommended to improve learners’ reflective competence. To be able to improve teacher feedback on reflective writing, it is essential to gain insight into which characteristics of written feedback stimulate students’ reflection processes. Therefore, we investigated (1) which characteristics can be distinguished in written feedback comments on reflective writing and (2) which of these characteristics are perceived to stimulate students’ reflection processes. METHODS: We investigated written feedback comments from forty-three teachers on their students’ reflective essays. In Study 1, twenty-three medical educators grouped the comments into distinct categories. We used Multiple Correspondence Analysis to determine dimensions in the set of comments. In Study 2, another group of twenty-one medical educators individually judged whether the comments stimulated reflection by rating them on a five-point scale. We used t-tests to investigate whether comments classified as stimulating and not stimulating reflection differed in their scores on the dimensions. RESULTS: Our results showed that characteristics of written feedback comments can be described in three dimensions: format of the feedback (phrased as statement versus question), focus of the feedback (related to the levels of students’ reflections) and tone of the feedback (positive versus negative). Furthermore, comments phrased as a question and in a positive tone were judged as stimulating reflection more than comments at the opposite side of those dimensions (t = (14.5) = 6.48; p = < .001 and t = (15) = −1.80; p < .10 respectively). The effect sizes were large for format of the feedback comment (r = .86) and medium for tone of the feedback comment (r = .42). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that written feedback comments on students’ reflective essays should be formulated as a question, positive in tone and tailored to the individual student’s reflective level in order to stimulate students to reflect on a slightly higher level. Further research is needed to examine whether incorporating these characteristics into teacher training helps to improve the quality of written feedback comments on reflective writing. BioMed Central 2013-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3750500/ /pubmed/23829790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-94 Text en Copyright © 2013 Dekker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dekker, Hanke Schönrock-Adema, Johanna Snoek, Jos W van der Molen, Thys Cohen-Schotanus, Janke Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study |
title | Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study |
title_full | Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study |
title_fullStr | Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study |
title_full_unstemmed | Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study |
title_short | Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study |
title_sort | which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students’ reflective competence: an exploratory study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23829790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-94 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekkerhanke whichcharacteristicsofwrittenfeedbackareperceivedasstimulatingstudentsreflectivecompetenceanexploratorystudy AT schonrockademajohanna whichcharacteristicsofwrittenfeedbackareperceivedasstimulatingstudentsreflectivecompetenceanexploratorystudy AT snoekjosw whichcharacteristicsofwrittenfeedbackareperceivedasstimulatingstudentsreflectivecompetenceanexploratorystudy AT vandermolenthys whichcharacteristicsofwrittenfeedbackareperceivedasstimulatingstudentsreflectivecompetenceanexploratorystudy AT cohenschotanusjanke whichcharacteristicsofwrittenfeedbackareperceivedasstimulatingstudentsreflectivecompetenceanexploratorystudy |