Cargando…

Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm

DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bo, Zhou, Yan, Lin, Nan, Lowdon, Rebecca F., Hong, Chibo, Nagarajan, Raman P., Cheng, Jeffrey B., Li, Daofeng, Stevens, Michael, Lee, Hyung Joo, Xing, Xiaoyun, Zhou, Jia, Sundaram, Vasavi, Elliott, GiNell, Gu, Junchen, Shi, Taoping, Gascard, Philippe, Sigaroudinia, Mahvash, Tlsty, Thea D., Kadlecek, Theresa, Weiss, Arthur, O’Geen, Henriette, Farnham, Peggy J., Maire, Cécile L., Ligon, Keith L., Madden, Pamela A.F., Tam, Angela, Moore, Richard, Hirst, Martin, Marra, Marco A., Zhang, Baoxue, Costello, Joseph F., Wang, Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113
_version_ 1782282672090906624
author Zhang, Bo
Zhou, Yan
Lin, Nan
Lowdon, Rebecca F.
Hong, Chibo
Nagarajan, Raman P.
Cheng, Jeffrey B.
Li, Daofeng
Stevens, Michael
Lee, Hyung Joo
Xing, Xiaoyun
Zhou, Jia
Sundaram, Vasavi
Elliott, GiNell
Gu, Junchen
Shi, Taoping
Gascard, Philippe
Sigaroudinia, Mahvash
Tlsty, Thea D.
Kadlecek, Theresa
Weiss, Arthur
O’Geen, Henriette
Farnham, Peggy J.
Maire, Cécile L.
Ligon, Keith L.
Madden, Pamela A.F.
Tam, Angela
Moore, Richard
Hirst, Martin
Marra, Marco A.
Zhang, Baoxue
Costello, Joseph F.
Wang, Ting
author_facet Zhang, Bo
Zhou, Yan
Lin, Nan
Lowdon, Rebecca F.
Hong, Chibo
Nagarajan, Raman P.
Cheng, Jeffrey B.
Li, Daofeng
Stevens, Michael
Lee, Hyung Joo
Xing, Xiaoyun
Zhou, Jia
Sundaram, Vasavi
Elliott, GiNell
Gu, Junchen
Shi, Taoping
Gascard, Philippe
Sigaroudinia, Mahvash
Tlsty, Thea D.
Kadlecek, Theresa
Weiss, Arthur
O’Geen, Henriette
Farnham, Peggy J.
Maire, Cécile L.
Ligon, Keith L.
Madden, Pamela A.F.
Tam, Angela
Moore, Richard
Hirst, Martin
Marra, Marco A.
Zhang, Baoxue
Costello, Joseph F.
Wang, Ting
author_sort Zhang, Bo
collection PubMed
description DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework M&M (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of M&M compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3759728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37597282013-09-04 Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yan Lin, Nan Lowdon, Rebecca F. Hong, Chibo Nagarajan, Raman P. Cheng, Jeffrey B. Li, Daofeng Stevens, Michael Lee, Hyung Joo Xing, Xiaoyun Zhou, Jia Sundaram, Vasavi Elliott, GiNell Gu, Junchen Shi, Taoping Gascard, Philippe Sigaroudinia, Mahvash Tlsty, Thea D. Kadlecek, Theresa Weiss, Arthur O’Geen, Henriette Farnham, Peggy J. Maire, Cécile L. Ligon, Keith L. Madden, Pamela A.F. Tam, Angela Moore, Richard Hirst, Martin Marra, Marco A. Zhang, Baoxue Costello, Joseph F. Wang, Ting Genome Res Method DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework M&M (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of M&M compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3759728/ /pubmed/23804400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113 Text en © 2013, Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Method
Zhang, Bo
Zhou, Yan
Lin, Nan
Lowdon, Rebecca F.
Hong, Chibo
Nagarajan, Raman P.
Cheng, Jeffrey B.
Li, Daofeng
Stevens, Michael
Lee, Hyung Joo
Xing, Xiaoyun
Zhou, Jia
Sundaram, Vasavi
Elliott, GiNell
Gu, Junchen
Shi, Taoping
Gascard, Philippe
Sigaroudinia, Mahvash
Tlsty, Thea D.
Kadlecek, Theresa
Weiss, Arthur
O’Geen, Henriette
Farnham, Peggy J.
Maire, Cécile L.
Ligon, Keith L.
Madden, Pamela A.F.
Tam, Angela
Moore, Richard
Hirst, Martin
Marra, Marco A.
Zhang, Baoxue
Costello, Joseph F.
Wang, Ting
Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm
title Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm
title_full Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm
title_fullStr Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm
title_short Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm
title_sort functional dna methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the m&m algorithm
topic Method
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbo functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT zhouyan functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT linnan functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT lowdonrebeccaf functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT hongchibo functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT nagarajanramanp functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT chengjeffreyb functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT lidaofeng functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT stevensmichael functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT leehyungjoo functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT xingxiaoyun functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT zhoujia functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT sundaramvasavi functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT elliottginell functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT gujunchen functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT shitaoping functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT gascardphilippe functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT sigaroudiniamahvash functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT tlstythead functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT kadlecektheresa functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT weissarthur functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT ogeenhenriette functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT farnhampeggyj functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT mairececilel functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT ligonkeithl functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT maddenpamelaaf functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT tamangela functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT moorerichard functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT hirstmartin functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT marramarcoa functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT zhangbaoxue functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT costellojosephf functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm
AT wangting functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm