Cargando…
Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm
DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113 |
_version_ | 1782282672090906624 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yan Lin, Nan Lowdon, Rebecca F. Hong, Chibo Nagarajan, Raman P. Cheng, Jeffrey B. Li, Daofeng Stevens, Michael Lee, Hyung Joo Xing, Xiaoyun Zhou, Jia Sundaram, Vasavi Elliott, GiNell Gu, Junchen Shi, Taoping Gascard, Philippe Sigaroudinia, Mahvash Tlsty, Thea D. Kadlecek, Theresa Weiss, Arthur O’Geen, Henriette Farnham, Peggy J. Maire, Cécile L. Ligon, Keith L. Madden, Pamela A.F. Tam, Angela Moore, Richard Hirst, Martin Marra, Marco A. Zhang, Baoxue Costello, Joseph F. Wang, Ting |
author_facet | Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yan Lin, Nan Lowdon, Rebecca F. Hong, Chibo Nagarajan, Raman P. Cheng, Jeffrey B. Li, Daofeng Stevens, Michael Lee, Hyung Joo Xing, Xiaoyun Zhou, Jia Sundaram, Vasavi Elliott, GiNell Gu, Junchen Shi, Taoping Gascard, Philippe Sigaroudinia, Mahvash Tlsty, Thea D. Kadlecek, Theresa Weiss, Arthur O’Geen, Henriette Farnham, Peggy J. Maire, Cécile L. Ligon, Keith L. Madden, Pamela A.F. Tam, Angela Moore, Richard Hirst, Martin Marra, Marco A. Zhang, Baoxue Costello, Joseph F. Wang, Ting |
author_sort | Zhang, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework M&M (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of M&M compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3759728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37597282013-09-04 Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yan Lin, Nan Lowdon, Rebecca F. Hong, Chibo Nagarajan, Raman P. Cheng, Jeffrey B. Li, Daofeng Stevens, Michael Lee, Hyung Joo Xing, Xiaoyun Zhou, Jia Sundaram, Vasavi Elliott, GiNell Gu, Junchen Shi, Taoping Gascard, Philippe Sigaroudinia, Mahvash Tlsty, Thea D. Kadlecek, Theresa Weiss, Arthur O’Geen, Henriette Farnham, Peggy J. Maire, Cécile L. Ligon, Keith L. Madden, Pamela A.F. Tam, Angela Moore, Richard Hirst, Martin Marra, Marco A. Zhang, Baoxue Costello, Joseph F. Wang, Ting Genome Res Method DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and tissue-specific gene expression. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA methylomes. This includes one of the most widely applied technologies for measuring DNA methylation: methylated DNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), coupled with a complementary method, methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sequencing (MRE-seq). A computational approach that integrates data from these two different but complementary assays and predicts methylation differences between samples has been unavailable. Here, we present a novel integrative statistical framework M&M (for integration of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq) that dynamically scales, normalizes, and combines MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to detect differentially methylated regions. Using sample-matched whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as a gold standard, we demonstrate superior accuracy and reproducibility of M&M compared to existing analytical methods for MeDIP-seq data alone. M&M leverages the complementary nature of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data to allow rapid comparative analysis between whole methylomes at a fraction of the cost of WGBS. Comprehensive analysis of nineteen human DNA methylomes with M&M reveals distinct DNA methylation patterns among different tissue types, cell types, and individuals, potentially underscoring divergent epigenetic regulation at different scales of phenotypic diversity. We find that differential DNA methylation at enhancer elements, with concurrent changes in histone modifications and transcription factor binding, is common at the cell, tissue, and individual levels, whereas promoter methylation is more prominent in reinforcing fundamental tissue identities. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3759728/ /pubmed/23804400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113 Text en © 2013, Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Method Zhang, Bo Zhou, Yan Lin, Nan Lowdon, Rebecca F. Hong, Chibo Nagarajan, Raman P. Cheng, Jeffrey B. Li, Daofeng Stevens, Michael Lee, Hyung Joo Xing, Xiaoyun Zhou, Jia Sundaram, Vasavi Elliott, GiNell Gu, Junchen Shi, Taoping Gascard, Philippe Sigaroudinia, Mahvash Tlsty, Thea D. Kadlecek, Theresa Weiss, Arthur O’Geen, Henriette Farnham, Peggy J. Maire, Cécile L. Ligon, Keith L. Madden, Pamela A.F. Tam, Angela Moore, Richard Hirst, Martin Marra, Marco A. Zhang, Baoxue Costello, Joseph F. Wang, Ting Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm |
title | Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm |
title_full | Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm |
title_fullStr | Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm |
title_short | Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm |
title_sort | functional dna methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the m&m algorithm |
topic | Method |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangbo functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT zhouyan functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT linnan functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT lowdonrebeccaf functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT hongchibo functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT nagarajanramanp functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT chengjeffreyb functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT lidaofeng functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT stevensmichael functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT leehyungjoo functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT xingxiaoyun functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT zhoujia functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT sundaramvasavi functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT elliottginell functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT gujunchen functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT shitaoping functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT gascardphilippe functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT sigaroudiniamahvash functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT tlstythead functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT kadlecektheresa functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT weissarthur functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT ogeenhenriette functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT farnhampeggyj functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT mairececilel functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT ligonkeithl functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT maddenpamelaaf functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT tamangela functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT moorerichard functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT hirstmartin functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT marramarcoa functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT zhangbaoxue functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT costellojosephf functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm AT wangting functionaldnamethylationdifferencesbetweentissuescelltypesandacrossindividualsdiscoveredusingthemmalgorithm |