Cargando…
Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells
BACKGROUND: Targeted liposome-polycation-DNA complex (LPD), mainly conjugated with antibodies using functionalized PEG derivatives, is an effective nanovector for systemic delivery of small interference RNA (siRNA). However, there are few studies reporting the effect of different conjugation linkers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S47597 |
_version_ | 1782283664339501056 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Li Zhang, Yingying Ma, Lulu Jing, Xiaolong Ke, Xingfa Lian, Jianhao Zhao, Qiang Yan, Bo Zhang, Jinfeng Yao, Jianzhong Chen, Jianming |
author_facet | Deng, Li Zhang, Yingying Ma, Lulu Jing, Xiaolong Ke, Xingfa Lian, Jianhao Zhao, Qiang Yan, Bo Zhang, Jinfeng Yao, Jianzhong Chen, Jianming |
author_sort | Deng, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Targeted liposome-polycation-DNA complex (LPD), mainly conjugated with antibodies using functionalized PEG derivatives, is an effective nanovector for systemic delivery of small interference RNA (siRNA). However, there are few studies reporting the effect of different conjugation linkers on LPD for gene silencing. To clarify the influence of antibody conjugation linkers on LPD, we prepared two different immunoliposomes to deliver siRNA in which DSPE-PEG-COOH and DSPE-PEG-MAL, the commonly used PEG derivative linkers, were used to conjugate anti-EGFR Fab’ with the liposome. METHODS: First, 600 μg of anti-EGFR Fab’ was conjugated with 28.35 μL of a micelle solution containing DSPE-PEG-MAL or DSPE-PEG-COOH, and then post inserted into the prepared LPD. Various liposome parameters, including particle size, zeta potential, stability, and encapsulation efficiency were evaluated, and the targeting ability and gene silencing activity of TLPD-FPC (DSPE-PEG-COOH conjugated with Fab’) was compared with that of TLPD-FPM (DSPE-PEG-MAL conjugated with Fab’) in SMMC-7721 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in particle size between the two TLPDs, but the zeta potential was significantly different. Further, although there was no significant difference in siRNA encapsulation efficiency, cell viability, or serum stability between TLPD-FPM and TLPD-FPC, cellular uptake of TLPD-FPM was significantly greater than that of TLPD-FPC in EGFR-overexpressing SMMC-7721 cells. The luciferase gene silencing efficiency of TLPD-FPM was approximately three-fold high than that of TLPD-FPC. CONCLUSION: Different conjugation linkers whereby antibodies are conjugated with LPD can affect the physicochemical properties of LPD and antibody conjugation efficiency, thus directly affecting the gene silencing effect of TLPD. Immunoliposomes prepared by DSPE-PEG-MAL conjugation with anti-EGFR Fab’ are more effective than TLPD containing DSPE-PEG-COOH in targeting hepatocellular carcinoma cells for siRNA delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3767494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37674942013-09-10 Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells Deng, Li Zhang, Yingying Ma, Lulu Jing, Xiaolong Ke, Xingfa Lian, Jianhao Zhao, Qiang Yan, Bo Zhang, Jinfeng Yao, Jianzhong Chen, Jianming Int J Nanomedicine Original Research BACKGROUND: Targeted liposome-polycation-DNA complex (LPD), mainly conjugated with antibodies using functionalized PEG derivatives, is an effective nanovector for systemic delivery of small interference RNA (siRNA). However, there are few studies reporting the effect of different conjugation linkers on LPD for gene silencing. To clarify the influence of antibody conjugation linkers on LPD, we prepared two different immunoliposomes to deliver siRNA in which DSPE-PEG-COOH and DSPE-PEG-MAL, the commonly used PEG derivative linkers, were used to conjugate anti-EGFR Fab’ with the liposome. METHODS: First, 600 μg of anti-EGFR Fab’ was conjugated with 28.35 μL of a micelle solution containing DSPE-PEG-MAL or DSPE-PEG-COOH, and then post inserted into the prepared LPD. Various liposome parameters, including particle size, zeta potential, stability, and encapsulation efficiency were evaluated, and the targeting ability and gene silencing activity of TLPD-FPC (DSPE-PEG-COOH conjugated with Fab’) was compared with that of TLPD-FPM (DSPE-PEG-MAL conjugated with Fab’) in SMMC-7721 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in particle size between the two TLPDs, but the zeta potential was significantly different. Further, although there was no significant difference in siRNA encapsulation efficiency, cell viability, or serum stability between TLPD-FPM and TLPD-FPC, cellular uptake of TLPD-FPM was significantly greater than that of TLPD-FPC in EGFR-overexpressing SMMC-7721 cells. The luciferase gene silencing efficiency of TLPD-FPM was approximately three-fold high than that of TLPD-FPC. CONCLUSION: Different conjugation linkers whereby antibodies are conjugated with LPD can affect the physicochemical properties of LPD and antibody conjugation efficiency, thus directly affecting the gene silencing effect of TLPD. Immunoliposomes prepared by DSPE-PEG-MAL conjugation with anti-EGFR Fab’ are more effective than TLPD containing DSPE-PEG-COOH in targeting hepatocellular carcinoma cells for siRNA delivery. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3767494/ /pubmed/24023515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S47597 Text en © 2013 Deng et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Deng, Li Zhang, Yingying Ma, Lulu Jing, Xiaolong Ke, Xingfa Lian, Jianhao Zhao, Qiang Yan, Bo Zhang, Jinfeng Yao, Jianzhong Chen, Jianming Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells |
title | Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells |
title_full | Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells |
title_fullStr | Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells |
title_short | Comparison of anti-EGFR-Fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for siRNa delivery in SMMC-7721 cells |
title_sort | comparison of anti-egfr-fab’ conjugated immunoliposomes modified with two different conjugation linkers for sirna delivery in smmc-7721 cells |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S47597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengli comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT zhangyingying comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT malulu comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT jingxiaolong comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT kexingfa comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT lianjianhao comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT zhaoqiang comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT yanbo comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT zhangjinfeng comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT yaojianzhong comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells AT chenjianming comparisonofantiegfrfabconjugatedimmunoliposomesmodifiedwithtwodifferentconjugationlinkersforsirnadeliveryinsmmc7721cells |