Cargando…
Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification
Gene expression measurements detailing mRNA quantities are widely employed in molecular biology and are increasingly important in diagnostic fields. Reverse transcription (RT), necessary for generating complementary DNA, can be both inefficient and imprecise, but remains a quintessential RNA analysi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24073259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075296 |
_version_ | 1782285205318402048 |
---|---|
author | Sanders, Rebecca Mason, Deborah J. Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. |
author_facet | Sanders, Rebecca Mason, Deborah J. Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. |
author_sort | Sanders, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gene expression measurements detailing mRNA quantities are widely employed in molecular biology and are increasingly important in diagnostic fields. Reverse transcription (RT), necessary for generating complementary DNA, can be both inefficient and imprecise, but remains a quintessential RNA analysis tool using qPCR. This study developed a Transcriptomic Calibration Material and assessed the RT reaction using digital (d)PCR for RNA measurement. While many studies characterise dPCR capabilities for DNA quantification, less work has been performed investigating similar parameters using RT-dPCR for RNA analysis. RT-dPCR measurement using three, one-step RT-qPCR kits was evaluated using single and multiplex formats when measuring endogenous and synthetic RNAs. The best performing kit was compared to UV quantification and sensitivity and technical reproducibility investigated. Our results demonstrate assay and kit dependent RT-dPCR measurements differed significantly compared to UV quantification. Different values were reported by different kits for each target, despite evaluation of identical samples using the same instrument. RT-dPCR did not display the strong inter-assay agreement previously described when analysing DNA. This study demonstrates that, as with DNA measurement, RT-dPCR is capable of accurate quantification of low copy RNA targets, but the results are both kit and target dependent supporting the need for calibration controls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3779174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37791742013-09-26 Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification Sanders, Rebecca Mason, Deborah J. Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. PLoS One Research Article Gene expression measurements detailing mRNA quantities are widely employed in molecular biology and are increasingly important in diagnostic fields. Reverse transcription (RT), necessary for generating complementary DNA, can be both inefficient and imprecise, but remains a quintessential RNA analysis tool using qPCR. This study developed a Transcriptomic Calibration Material and assessed the RT reaction using digital (d)PCR for RNA measurement. While many studies characterise dPCR capabilities for DNA quantification, less work has been performed investigating similar parameters using RT-dPCR for RNA analysis. RT-dPCR measurement using three, one-step RT-qPCR kits was evaluated using single and multiplex formats when measuring endogenous and synthetic RNAs. The best performing kit was compared to UV quantification and sensitivity and technical reproducibility investigated. Our results demonstrate assay and kit dependent RT-dPCR measurements differed significantly compared to UV quantification. Different values were reported by different kits for each target, despite evaluation of identical samples using the same instrument. RT-dPCR did not display the strong inter-assay agreement previously described when analysing DNA. This study demonstrates that, as with DNA measurement, RT-dPCR is capable of accurate quantification of low copy RNA targets, but the results are both kit and target dependent supporting the need for calibration controls. Public Library of Science 2013-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3779174/ /pubmed/24073259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075296 Text en © 2013 Sanders et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sanders, Rebecca Mason, Deborah J. Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification |
title | Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification |
title_full | Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification |
title_short | Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification |
title_sort | evaluation of digital pcr for absolute rna quantification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24073259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandersrebecca evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification AT masondeborahj evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification AT foycarolea evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification AT huggettjimf evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification |