Cargando…

Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification

Gene expression measurements detailing mRNA quantities are widely employed in molecular biology and are increasingly important in diagnostic fields. Reverse transcription (RT), necessary for generating complementary DNA, can be both inefficient and imprecise, but remains a quintessential RNA analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanders, Rebecca, Mason, Deborah J., Foy, Carole A., Huggett, Jim F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24073259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075296
_version_ 1782285205318402048
author Sanders, Rebecca
Mason, Deborah J.
Foy, Carole A.
Huggett, Jim F.
author_facet Sanders, Rebecca
Mason, Deborah J.
Foy, Carole A.
Huggett, Jim F.
author_sort Sanders, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Gene expression measurements detailing mRNA quantities are widely employed in molecular biology and are increasingly important in diagnostic fields. Reverse transcription (RT), necessary for generating complementary DNA, can be both inefficient and imprecise, but remains a quintessential RNA analysis tool using qPCR. This study developed a Transcriptomic Calibration Material and assessed the RT reaction using digital (d)PCR for RNA measurement. While many studies characterise dPCR capabilities for DNA quantification, less work has been performed investigating similar parameters using RT-dPCR for RNA analysis. RT-dPCR measurement using three, one-step RT-qPCR kits was evaluated using single and multiplex formats when measuring endogenous and synthetic RNAs. The best performing kit was compared to UV quantification and sensitivity and technical reproducibility investigated. Our results demonstrate assay and kit dependent RT-dPCR measurements differed significantly compared to UV quantification. Different values were reported by different kits for each target, despite evaluation of identical samples using the same instrument. RT-dPCR did not display the strong inter-assay agreement previously described when analysing DNA. This study demonstrates that, as with DNA measurement, RT-dPCR is capable of accurate quantification of low copy RNA targets, but the results are both kit and target dependent supporting the need for calibration controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3779174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37791742013-09-26 Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification Sanders, Rebecca Mason, Deborah J. Foy, Carole A. Huggett, Jim F. PLoS One Research Article Gene expression measurements detailing mRNA quantities are widely employed in molecular biology and are increasingly important in diagnostic fields. Reverse transcription (RT), necessary for generating complementary DNA, can be both inefficient and imprecise, but remains a quintessential RNA analysis tool using qPCR. This study developed a Transcriptomic Calibration Material and assessed the RT reaction using digital (d)PCR for RNA measurement. While many studies characterise dPCR capabilities for DNA quantification, less work has been performed investigating similar parameters using RT-dPCR for RNA analysis. RT-dPCR measurement using three, one-step RT-qPCR kits was evaluated using single and multiplex formats when measuring endogenous and synthetic RNAs. The best performing kit was compared to UV quantification and sensitivity and technical reproducibility investigated. Our results demonstrate assay and kit dependent RT-dPCR measurements differed significantly compared to UV quantification. Different values were reported by different kits for each target, despite evaluation of identical samples using the same instrument. RT-dPCR did not display the strong inter-assay agreement previously described when analysing DNA. This study demonstrates that, as with DNA measurement, RT-dPCR is capable of accurate quantification of low copy RNA targets, but the results are both kit and target dependent supporting the need for calibration controls. Public Library of Science 2013-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3779174/ /pubmed/24073259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075296 Text en © 2013 Sanders et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sanders, Rebecca
Mason, Deborah J.
Foy, Carole A.
Huggett, Jim F.
Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification
title Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification
title_full Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification
title_fullStr Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification
title_short Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification
title_sort evaluation of digital pcr for absolute rna quantification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24073259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075296
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersrebecca evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification
AT masondeborahj evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification
AT foycarolea evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification
AT huggettjimf evaluationofdigitalpcrforabsoluternaquantification