Cargando…

On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison

The characteristics of the mid-Pliocene warm period (mPWP: 3.264–3.025 Ma BP) have been examined using geological proxies and climate models. While there is agreement between models and data, details of regional climate differ. Uncertainties in prescribed forcings and in proxy data limit the utility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haywood, Alan M., Dolan, Aisling M., Pickering, Steven J., Dowsett, Harry J., McClymont, Erin L., Prescott, Caroline L., Salzmann, Ulrich, Hill, Daniel J., Hunter, Stephen J., Lunt, Daniel J., Pope, James O., Valdes, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3785814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24043865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0515
_version_ 1782477696579665920
author Haywood, Alan M.
Dolan, Aisling M.
Pickering, Steven J.
Dowsett, Harry J.
McClymont, Erin L.
Prescott, Caroline L.
Salzmann, Ulrich
Hill, Daniel J.
Hunter, Stephen J.
Lunt, Daniel J.
Pope, James O.
Valdes, Paul J.
author_facet Haywood, Alan M.
Dolan, Aisling M.
Pickering, Steven J.
Dowsett, Harry J.
McClymont, Erin L.
Prescott, Caroline L.
Salzmann, Ulrich
Hill, Daniel J.
Hunter, Stephen J.
Lunt, Daniel J.
Pope, James O.
Valdes, Paul J.
author_sort Haywood, Alan M.
collection PubMed
description The characteristics of the mid-Pliocene warm period (mPWP: 3.264–3.025 Ma BP) have been examined using geological proxies and climate models. While there is agreement between models and data, details of regional climate differ. Uncertainties in prescribed forcings and in proxy data limit the utility of the interval to understand the dynamics of a warmer than present climate or evaluate models. This uncertainty comes, in part, from the reconstruction of a time slab rather than a time slice, where forcings required by climate models can be more adequately constrained. Here, we describe the rationale and approach for identifying a time slice(s) for Pliocene environmental reconstruction. A time slice centred on 3.205 Ma BP (3.204–3.207 Ma BP) has been identified as a priority for investigation. It is a warm interval characterized by a negative benthic oxygen isotope excursion (0.21–0.23‰) centred on marine isotope stage KM5c (KM5.3). It occurred during a period of orbital forcing that was very similar to present day. Climate model simulations indicate that proxy temperature estimates are unlikely to be significantly affected by orbital forcing for at least a precession cycle centred on the time slice, with the North Atlantic potentially being an important exception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3785814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37858142013-10-28 On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison Haywood, Alan M. Dolan, Aisling M. Pickering, Steven J. Dowsett, Harry J. McClymont, Erin L. Prescott, Caroline L. Salzmann, Ulrich Hill, Daniel J. Hunter, Stephen J. Lunt, Daniel J. Pope, James O. Valdes, Paul J. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles The characteristics of the mid-Pliocene warm period (mPWP: 3.264–3.025 Ma BP) have been examined using geological proxies and climate models. While there is agreement between models and data, details of regional climate differ. Uncertainties in prescribed forcings and in proxy data limit the utility of the interval to understand the dynamics of a warmer than present climate or evaluate models. This uncertainty comes, in part, from the reconstruction of a time slab rather than a time slice, where forcings required by climate models can be more adequately constrained. Here, we describe the rationale and approach for identifying a time slice(s) for Pliocene environmental reconstruction. A time slice centred on 3.205 Ma BP (3.204–3.207 Ma BP) has been identified as a priority for investigation. It is a warm interval characterized by a negative benthic oxygen isotope excursion (0.21–0.23‰) centred on marine isotope stage KM5c (KM5.3). It occurred during a period of orbital forcing that was very similar to present day. Climate model simulations indicate that proxy temperature estimates are unlikely to be significantly affected by orbital forcing for at least a precession cycle centred on the time slice, with the North Atlantic potentially being an important exception. The Royal Society Publishing 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3785814/ /pubmed/24043865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0515 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ © 2013 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Haywood, Alan M.
Dolan, Aisling M.
Pickering, Steven J.
Dowsett, Harry J.
McClymont, Erin L.
Prescott, Caroline L.
Salzmann, Ulrich
Hill, Daniel J.
Hunter, Stephen J.
Lunt, Daniel J.
Pope, James O.
Valdes, Paul J.
On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison
title On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison
title_full On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison
title_fullStr On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison
title_full_unstemmed On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison
title_short On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison
title_sort on the identification of a pliocene time slice for data–model comparison
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3785814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24043865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0515
work_keys_str_mv AT haywoodalanm ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT dolanaislingm ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT pickeringstevenj ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT dowsettharryj ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT mcclymonterinl ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT prescottcarolinel ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT salzmannulrich ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT hilldanielj ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT hunterstephenj ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT luntdanielj ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT popejameso ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison
AT valdespaulj ontheidentificationofapliocenetimeslicefordatamodelcomparison