Cargando…
Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes
Plants and animals have evolved a first line of defense response to pathogens called innate or basal immunity. While basal defenses in these organisms are well studied, there is almost a complete lack of understanding of such systems in fungal species, and more specifically, how they are able to det...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076487 |
_version_ | 1782286475562319872 |
---|---|
author | Mathioni, Sandra M. Patel, Nrupali Riddick, Bianca Sweigard, James A. Czymmek, Kirk J. Caplan, Jeffrey L. Kunjeti, Sridhara G. Kunjeti, Saritha Raman, Vidhyavathi Hillman, Bradley I. Kobayashi, Donald Y. Donofrio, Nicole M. |
author_facet | Mathioni, Sandra M. Patel, Nrupali Riddick, Bianca Sweigard, James A. Czymmek, Kirk J. Caplan, Jeffrey L. Kunjeti, Sridhara G. Kunjeti, Saritha Raman, Vidhyavathi Hillman, Bradley I. Kobayashi, Donald Y. Donofrio, Nicole M. |
author_sort | Mathioni, Sandra M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plants and animals have evolved a first line of defense response to pathogens called innate or basal immunity. While basal defenses in these organisms are well studied, there is almost a complete lack of understanding of such systems in fungal species, and more specifically, how they are able to detect and mount a defense response upon pathogen attack. Hence, the goal of the present study was to understand how fungi respond to biotic stress by assessing the transcriptional profile of the rice blast pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, when challenged with the bacterial antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes. Based on microscopic observations of interactions between M. oryzae and wild-type L. enzymogenes strain C3, we selected early and intermediate stages represented by time-points of 3 and 9 hours post-inoculation, respectively, to evaluate the fungal transcriptome using RNA-seq. For comparative purposes, we also challenged the fungus with L. enzymogenes mutant strain DCA, previously demonstrated to be devoid of antifungal activity. A comparison of transcriptional data from fungal interactions with the wild-type bacterial strain C3 and the mutant strain DCA revealed 463 fungal genes that were down-regulated during attack by C3; of these genes, 100 were also found to be up-regulated during the interaction with DCA. Functional categorization of genes in this suite included those with roles in carbohydrate metabolism, cellular transport and stress response. One gene in this suite belongs to the CFEM-domain class of fungal proteins. Another CFEM class protein called PTH11 has been previously characterized, and we found that a deletion in this gene caused advanced lesion development by C3 compared to its growth on the wild-type fungus. We discuss the characterization of this suite of 100 genes with respect to their role in the fungal defense response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3789685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37896852013-10-04 Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes Mathioni, Sandra M. Patel, Nrupali Riddick, Bianca Sweigard, James A. Czymmek, Kirk J. Caplan, Jeffrey L. Kunjeti, Sridhara G. Kunjeti, Saritha Raman, Vidhyavathi Hillman, Bradley I. Kobayashi, Donald Y. Donofrio, Nicole M. PLoS One Research Article Plants and animals have evolved a first line of defense response to pathogens called innate or basal immunity. While basal defenses in these organisms are well studied, there is almost a complete lack of understanding of such systems in fungal species, and more specifically, how they are able to detect and mount a defense response upon pathogen attack. Hence, the goal of the present study was to understand how fungi respond to biotic stress by assessing the transcriptional profile of the rice blast pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, when challenged with the bacterial antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes. Based on microscopic observations of interactions between M. oryzae and wild-type L. enzymogenes strain C3, we selected early and intermediate stages represented by time-points of 3 and 9 hours post-inoculation, respectively, to evaluate the fungal transcriptome using RNA-seq. For comparative purposes, we also challenged the fungus with L. enzymogenes mutant strain DCA, previously demonstrated to be devoid of antifungal activity. A comparison of transcriptional data from fungal interactions with the wild-type bacterial strain C3 and the mutant strain DCA revealed 463 fungal genes that were down-regulated during attack by C3; of these genes, 100 were also found to be up-regulated during the interaction with DCA. Functional categorization of genes in this suite included those with roles in carbohydrate metabolism, cellular transport and stress response. One gene in this suite belongs to the CFEM-domain class of fungal proteins. Another CFEM class protein called PTH11 has been previously characterized, and we found that a deletion in this gene caused advanced lesion development by C3 compared to its growth on the wild-type fungus. We discuss the characterization of this suite of 100 genes with respect to their role in the fungal defense response. Public Library of Science 2013-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3789685/ /pubmed/24098512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076487 Text en © 2013 Mathioni et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mathioni, Sandra M. Patel, Nrupali Riddick, Bianca Sweigard, James A. Czymmek, Kirk J. Caplan, Jeffrey L. Kunjeti, Sridhara G. Kunjeti, Saritha Raman, Vidhyavathi Hillman, Bradley I. Kobayashi, Donald Y. Donofrio, Nicole M. Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes |
title | Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes |
title_full | Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes |
title_fullStr | Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes |
title_short | Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes |
title_sort | transcriptomics of the rice blast fungus magnaporthe oryzae in response to the bacterial antagonist lysobacter enzymogenes reveals candidate fungal defense response genes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathionisandram transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT patelnrupali transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT riddickbianca transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT sweigardjamesa transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT czymmekkirkj transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT caplanjeffreyl transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT kunjetisridharag transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT kunjetisaritha transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT ramanvidhyavathi transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT hillmanbradleyi transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT kobayashidonaldy transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes AT donofrionicolem transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes |