Cargando…

Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes

Plants and animals have evolved a first line of defense response to pathogens called innate or basal immunity. While basal defenses in these organisms are well studied, there is almost a complete lack of understanding of such systems in fungal species, and more specifically, how they are able to det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathioni, Sandra M., Patel, Nrupali, Riddick, Bianca, Sweigard, James A., Czymmek, Kirk J., Caplan, Jeffrey L., Kunjeti, Sridhara G., Kunjeti, Saritha, Raman, Vidhyavathi, Hillman, Bradley I., Kobayashi, Donald Y., Donofrio, Nicole M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076487
_version_ 1782286475562319872
author Mathioni, Sandra M.
Patel, Nrupali
Riddick, Bianca
Sweigard, James A.
Czymmek, Kirk J.
Caplan, Jeffrey L.
Kunjeti, Sridhara G.
Kunjeti, Saritha
Raman, Vidhyavathi
Hillman, Bradley I.
Kobayashi, Donald Y.
Donofrio, Nicole M.
author_facet Mathioni, Sandra M.
Patel, Nrupali
Riddick, Bianca
Sweigard, James A.
Czymmek, Kirk J.
Caplan, Jeffrey L.
Kunjeti, Sridhara G.
Kunjeti, Saritha
Raman, Vidhyavathi
Hillman, Bradley I.
Kobayashi, Donald Y.
Donofrio, Nicole M.
author_sort Mathioni, Sandra M.
collection PubMed
description Plants and animals have evolved a first line of defense response to pathogens called innate or basal immunity. While basal defenses in these organisms are well studied, there is almost a complete lack of understanding of such systems in fungal species, and more specifically, how they are able to detect and mount a defense response upon pathogen attack. Hence, the goal of the present study was to understand how fungi respond to biotic stress by assessing the transcriptional profile of the rice blast pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, when challenged with the bacterial antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes. Based on microscopic observations of interactions between M. oryzae and wild-type L. enzymogenes strain C3, we selected early and intermediate stages represented by time-points of 3 and 9 hours post-inoculation, respectively, to evaluate the fungal transcriptome using RNA-seq. For comparative purposes, we also challenged the fungus with L. enzymogenes mutant strain DCA, previously demonstrated to be devoid of antifungal activity. A comparison of transcriptional data from fungal interactions with the wild-type bacterial strain C3 and the mutant strain DCA revealed 463 fungal genes that were down-regulated during attack by C3; of these genes, 100 were also found to be up-regulated during the interaction with DCA. Functional categorization of genes in this suite included those with roles in carbohydrate metabolism, cellular transport and stress response. One gene in this suite belongs to the CFEM-domain class of fungal proteins. Another CFEM class protein called PTH11 has been previously characterized, and we found that a deletion in this gene caused advanced lesion development by C3 compared to its growth on the wild-type fungus. We discuss the characterization of this suite of 100 genes with respect to their role in the fungal defense response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3789685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37896852013-10-04 Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes Mathioni, Sandra M. Patel, Nrupali Riddick, Bianca Sweigard, James A. Czymmek, Kirk J. Caplan, Jeffrey L. Kunjeti, Sridhara G. Kunjeti, Saritha Raman, Vidhyavathi Hillman, Bradley I. Kobayashi, Donald Y. Donofrio, Nicole M. PLoS One Research Article Plants and animals have evolved a first line of defense response to pathogens called innate or basal immunity. While basal defenses in these organisms are well studied, there is almost a complete lack of understanding of such systems in fungal species, and more specifically, how they are able to detect and mount a defense response upon pathogen attack. Hence, the goal of the present study was to understand how fungi respond to biotic stress by assessing the transcriptional profile of the rice blast pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae, when challenged with the bacterial antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes. Based on microscopic observations of interactions between M. oryzae and wild-type L. enzymogenes strain C3, we selected early and intermediate stages represented by time-points of 3 and 9 hours post-inoculation, respectively, to evaluate the fungal transcriptome using RNA-seq. For comparative purposes, we also challenged the fungus with L. enzymogenes mutant strain DCA, previously demonstrated to be devoid of antifungal activity. A comparison of transcriptional data from fungal interactions with the wild-type bacterial strain C3 and the mutant strain DCA revealed 463 fungal genes that were down-regulated during attack by C3; of these genes, 100 were also found to be up-regulated during the interaction with DCA. Functional categorization of genes in this suite included those with roles in carbohydrate metabolism, cellular transport and stress response. One gene in this suite belongs to the CFEM-domain class of fungal proteins. Another CFEM class protein called PTH11 has been previously characterized, and we found that a deletion in this gene caused advanced lesion development by C3 compared to its growth on the wild-type fungus. We discuss the characterization of this suite of 100 genes with respect to their role in the fungal defense response. Public Library of Science 2013-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3789685/ /pubmed/24098512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076487 Text en © 2013 Mathioni et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mathioni, Sandra M.
Patel, Nrupali
Riddick, Bianca
Sweigard, James A.
Czymmek, Kirk J.
Caplan, Jeffrey L.
Kunjeti, Sridhara G.
Kunjeti, Saritha
Raman, Vidhyavathi
Hillman, Bradley I.
Kobayashi, Donald Y.
Donofrio, Nicole M.
Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes
title Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes
title_full Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes
title_fullStr Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes
title_short Transcriptomics of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in Response to the Bacterial Antagonist Lysobacter enzymogenes Reveals Candidate Fungal Defense Response Genes
title_sort transcriptomics of the rice blast fungus magnaporthe oryzae in response to the bacterial antagonist lysobacter enzymogenes reveals candidate fungal defense response genes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24098512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076487
work_keys_str_mv AT mathionisandram transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT patelnrupali transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT riddickbianca transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT sweigardjamesa transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT czymmekkirkj transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT caplanjeffreyl transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT kunjetisridharag transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT kunjetisaritha transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT ramanvidhyavathi transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT hillmanbradleyi transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT kobayashidonaldy transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes
AT donofrionicolem transcriptomicsofthericeblastfungusmagnaportheoryzaeinresponsetothebacterialantagonistlysobacterenzymogenesrevealscandidatefungaldefenseresponsegenes