Cargando…

Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the lack of gestational age correction may explain some of the school failure seen in ex-preterm infants. DESIGN: A cohort study based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). The primary outcome was a low Key Stage 1 score (KS1) score at age 7 or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odd, David, Evans, David, Emond, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076615
_version_ 1782287668301791232
author Odd, David
Evans, David
Emond, Alan
author_facet Odd, David
Evans, David
Emond, Alan
author_sort Odd, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the lack of gestational age correction may explain some of the school failure seen in ex-preterm infants. DESIGN: A cohort study based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). The primary outcome was a low Key Stage 1 score (KS1) score at age 7 or having special educational needs (SEN). Exposure groups were defined as preterm (<37 weeks gestation, n = 722) or term (37–42 weeks, n = 11,268). Conditional regression models were derived, matching preterm to term infants on date of birth (DOB), expected date of delivery (EDD) or expected date of delivery and year of school entry. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing covariate data. RESULTS: When matching for DOB, infants born preterm had an increased odds of a low KS1 score (OR 1.73 (1.45–2.06)) and this association persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (OR 1.57 (1.25–1.97)). The association persisted in the analysis matching for EDD (fully adjusted OR 1.53 (1.21–1.94)) but attenuated substantially after additionally restricting to those infants who entered school at the same time as the control infants (fully adjusted OR 1.25 (0.98–1.60)). A compatible reduction in the population attributable risk fraction was seen from 4.60% to 2.12%, and year of school entry appeared to modify the association between gestational age and the risk of a poor KS1 score (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the school year placement and assessment of ex-preterm infants based on their actual birthday (rather than their EDD) may increase their risk of learning difficulties with corresponding school failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3797787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37977872013-10-21 Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance Odd, David Evans, David Emond, Alan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate if the lack of gestational age correction may explain some of the school failure seen in ex-preterm infants. DESIGN: A cohort study based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). The primary outcome was a low Key Stage 1 score (KS1) score at age 7 or having special educational needs (SEN). Exposure groups were defined as preterm (<37 weeks gestation, n = 722) or term (37–42 weeks, n = 11,268). Conditional regression models were derived, matching preterm to term infants on date of birth (DOB), expected date of delivery (EDD) or expected date of delivery and year of school entry. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing covariate data. RESULTS: When matching for DOB, infants born preterm had an increased odds of a low KS1 score (OR 1.73 (1.45–2.06)) and this association persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (OR 1.57 (1.25–1.97)). The association persisted in the analysis matching for EDD (fully adjusted OR 1.53 (1.21–1.94)) but attenuated substantially after additionally restricting to those infants who entered school at the same time as the control infants (fully adjusted OR 1.25 (0.98–1.60)). A compatible reduction in the population attributable risk fraction was seen from 4.60% to 2.12%, and year of school entry appeared to modify the association between gestational age and the risk of a poor KS1 score (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the school year placement and assessment of ex-preterm infants based on their actual birthday (rather than their EDD) may increase their risk of learning difficulties with corresponding school failure. Public Library of Science 2013-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3797787/ /pubmed/24146899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076615 Text en © 2013 Odd et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Odd, David
Evans, David
Emond, Alan
Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance
title Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance
title_full Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance
title_fullStr Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance
title_full_unstemmed Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance
title_short Preterm Birth, Age at School Entry and Educational Performance
title_sort preterm birth, age at school entry and educational performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076615
work_keys_str_mv AT odddavid pretermbirthageatschoolentryandeducationalperformance
AT evansdavid pretermbirthageatschoolentryandeducationalperformance
AT emondalan pretermbirthageatschoolentryandeducationalperformance