Cargando…
Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect
Passive exposure to neutral stimuli increases subsequent liking of those stimuli – the mere exposure effect. Because of the broad implications for understanding and controlling human preferences, the role of conscious awareness in mere exposure has received much attention. Previous studies have clai...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3798387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24147067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077726 |
_version_ | 1782287771436580864 |
---|---|
author | de Zilva, Daniel Vu, Luke Newell, Ben R. Pearson, Joel |
author_facet | de Zilva, Daniel Vu, Luke Newell, Ben R. Pearson, Joel |
author_sort | de Zilva, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Passive exposure to neutral stimuli increases subsequent liking of those stimuli – the mere exposure effect. Because of the broad implications for understanding and controlling human preferences, the role of conscious awareness in mere exposure has received much attention. Previous studies have claimed that the mere exposure effect can occur without conscious awareness of the stimuli. In two experiments, we applied a technique new to the mere exposure literature, called continuous flash suppression, to expose stimuli for a controlled duration with and without awareness. To ensure the reliability of the awareness manipulation, awareness was monitored on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results show that under these conditions the mere exposure effect does not occur without conscious awareness. In contrast, only when participants were aware of the stimuli did exposure increase liking and recognition. Together these data are consistent with the idea that the mere exposure effect requires conscious awareness and has important implications for theories of memory and affect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3798387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37983872013-10-21 Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect de Zilva, Daniel Vu, Luke Newell, Ben R. Pearson, Joel PLoS One Research Article Passive exposure to neutral stimuli increases subsequent liking of those stimuli – the mere exposure effect. Because of the broad implications for understanding and controlling human preferences, the role of conscious awareness in mere exposure has received much attention. Previous studies have claimed that the mere exposure effect can occur without conscious awareness of the stimuli. In two experiments, we applied a technique new to the mere exposure literature, called continuous flash suppression, to expose stimuli for a controlled duration with and without awareness. To ensure the reliability of the awareness manipulation, awareness was monitored on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results show that under these conditions the mere exposure effect does not occur without conscious awareness. In contrast, only when participants were aware of the stimuli did exposure increase liking and recognition. Together these data are consistent with the idea that the mere exposure effect requires conscious awareness and has important implications for theories of memory and affect. Public Library of Science 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3798387/ /pubmed/24147067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077726 Text en © 2013 de Zilva et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Zilva, Daniel Vu, Luke Newell, Ben R. Pearson, Joel Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect |
title | Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect |
title_full | Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect |
title_fullStr | Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect |
title_short | Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect |
title_sort | exposure is not enough: suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3798387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24147067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dezilvadaniel exposureisnotenoughsuppressingstimulifromawarenesscanabolishthemereexposureeffect AT vuluke exposureisnotenoughsuppressingstimulifromawarenesscanabolishthemereexposureeffect AT newellbenr exposureisnotenoughsuppressingstimulifromawarenesscanabolishthemereexposureeffect AT pearsonjoel exposureisnotenoughsuppressingstimulifromawarenesscanabolishthemereexposureeffect |