Cargando…

The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid-based methods offer promise for both targeted and exploratory investigations of microbes in tissue samples. As the starting material for such studies is a mixture of host and microbial DNA, we have critically evaluated the DNA extraction step to determine the quantitative an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radomski, Nicolas, Kreitmann, Louis, McIntosh, Fiona, Behr, Marcel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078749
_version_ 1782288448230522880
author Radomski, Nicolas
Kreitmann, Louis
McIntosh, Fiona
Behr, Marcel A.
author_facet Radomski, Nicolas
Kreitmann, Louis
McIntosh, Fiona
Behr, Marcel A.
author_sort Radomski, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid-based methods offer promise for both targeted and exploratory investigations of microbes in tissue samples. As the starting material for such studies is a mixture of host and microbial DNA, we have critically evaluated the DNA extraction step to determine the quantitative and qualitative parameters that permit faithful molecular detection of mycobacteria in infected tissue. Specifically, we assessed: 1) tissue disruption procedures; 2) DNA extraction protocols; and 3) inhibition of bacterial PCR by host DNA. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Regarding DNA extraction, we found that 1) grinding was not necessary if bead-beating is done, 2) the reference mycobacterial DNA extraction method recovered more pure DNA than commercial spin column kits, 3) lysozyme digestion of 1 hour was sufficient, and 4) repeated steps of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol offered minimal gain in DNA quality. By artificially mixing mycobacterial DNA with DNA extracted from uninfected mice, we found that bacterial real-time quantitative PCR was only reliable when the quantity of host DNA was < 3 µg in a final volume of 25 µl and the quality was high (260/280 nm ratio = 1.89±0.08). Findings from spiked DNA studies were confirmed using DNA extracted from mice infected with different intracellular pathogens (M. tuberculosis, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to the most appropriate methods for extracting DNA from tissue samples for the purpose of detecting and quantifying mycobacteria. These data also inform on the limits of detection for two mycobacterial species and indicate that increasing the sample mass to improve analytic sensitivity comes at the cost of inhibition of PCR by host DNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3806855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38068552013-11-05 The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues Radomski, Nicolas Kreitmann, Louis McIntosh, Fiona Behr, Marcel A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid-based methods offer promise for both targeted and exploratory investigations of microbes in tissue samples. As the starting material for such studies is a mixture of host and microbial DNA, we have critically evaluated the DNA extraction step to determine the quantitative and qualitative parameters that permit faithful molecular detection of mycobacteria in infected tissue. Specifically, we assessed: 1) tissue disruption procedures; 2) DNA extraction protocols; and 3) inhibition of bacterial PCR by host DNA. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Regarding DNA extraction, we found that 1) grinding was not necessary if bead-beating is done, 2) the reference mycobacterial DNA extraction method recovered more pure DNA than commercial spin column kits, 3) lysozyme digestion of 1 hour was sufficient, and 4) repeated steps of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol offered minimal gain in DNA quality. By artificially mixing mycobacterial DNA with DNA extracted from uninfected mice, we found that bacterial real-time quantitative PCR was only reliable when the quantity of host DNA was < 3 µg in a final volume of 25 µl and the quality was high (260/280 nm ratio = 1.89±0.08). Findings from spiked DNA studies were confirmed using DNA extracted from mice infected with different intracellular pathogens (M. tuberculosis, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to the most appropriate methods for extracting DNA from tissue samples for the purpose of detecting and quantifying mycobacteria. These data also inform on the limits of detection for two mycobacterial species and indicate that increasing the sample mass to improve analytic sensitivity comes at the cost of inhibition of PCR by host DNA. Public Library of Science 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3806855/ /pubmed/24194951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078749 Text en © 2013 Radomski et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Radomski, Nicolas
Kreitmann, Louis
McIntosh, Fiona
Behr, Marcel A.
The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues
title The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues
title_full The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues
title_fullStr The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues
title_full_unstemmed The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues
title_short The Critical Role of DNA Extraction for Detection of Mycobacteria in Tissues
title_sort critical role of dna extraction for detection of mycobacteria in tissues
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078749
work_keys_str_mv AT radomskinicolas thecriticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues
AT kreitmannlouis thecriticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues
AT mcintoshfiona thecriticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues
AT behrmarcela thecriticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues
AT radomskinicolas criticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues
AT kreitmannlouis criticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues
AT mcintoshfiona criticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues
AT behrmarcela criticalroleofdnaextractionfordetectionofmycobacteriaintissues