Cargando…

Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many studies have shown that not only pharmacological treatment but also cognitive stimulation in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) improves language processing and (other) cognitive functions, stabilizes Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schecker, M., Pirnay-Dummer, P., Schmidtke, K., Hentrich-Hesse, T., Borchardt, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000354190
_version_ 1782288559608168448
author Schecker, M.
Pirnay-Dummer, P.
Schmidtke, K.
Hentrich-Hesse, T.
Borchardt, D.
author_facet Schecker, M.
Pirnay-Dummer, P.
Schmidtke, K.
Hentrich-Hesse, T.
Borchardt, D.
author_sort Schecker, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many studies have shown that not only pharmacological treatment but also cognitive stimulation in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) improves language processing and (other) cognitive functions, stabilizes Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) functions and increases the subjective quality of life (wherein a combination of pharmacological intervention and cognitive stimulation could provide greater relief of clinical symptoms than either intervention given alone). Today, it is no longer the question of whether cognitive stimulation helps but rather what kind of stimulation helps more than others. METHODS: A sample of 42 subjects with mild AD (all medicated with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and well adjusted) underwent clinical and cognitive evaluation and participated in a 6-month study with 2 experimental groups (i.e. ‘client-centered’ global stimulation vs. cognitive training) and a control group. Since the test performance also depends on the individual test, we used a wide variety of tests; we z-transformed the results and then calculated the mean value for the global cognitive status (using the Mini-Mental State Examination) as well as for the single functional areas. RESULTS: Between-group differences were found, they were overall in favor of the experimental groups. Different functional areas led to different treatment and test patterns. Client-centered, global, cognitive therapy stimulated many cognitive functions and thus led to a better performance in language processing and ADL/IADL. The subjective quality of life increased as well. The cognitive training (of working memory) improved only the ADL/IADL performance (more, however, than client-centered, global, cognitive stimulation) and stabilized the level of performance in the other three functional areas. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3808226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38082262013-10-30 Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment Schecker, M. Pirnay-Dummer, P. Schmidtke, K. Hentrich-Hesse, T. Borchardt, D. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra Original Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Many studies have shown that not only pharmacological treatment but also cognitive stimulation in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) improves language processing and (other) cognitive functions, stabilizes Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) functions and increases the subjective quality of life (wherein a combination of pharmacological intervention and cognitive stimulation could provide greater relief of clinical symptoms than either intervention given alone). Today, it is no longer the question of whether cognitive stimulation helps but rather what kind of stimulation helps more than others. METHODS: A sample of 42 subjects with mild AD (all medicated with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and well adjusted) underwent clinical and cognitive evaluation and participated in a 6-month study with 2 experimental groups (i.e. ‘client-centered’ global stimulation vs. cognitive training) and a control group. Since the test performance also depends on the individual test, we used a wide variety of tests; we z-transformed the results and then calculated the mean value for the global cognitive status (using the Mini-Mental State Examination) as well as for the single functional areas. RESULTS: Between-group differences were found, they were overall in favor of the experimental groups. Different functional areas led to different treatment and test patterns. Client-centered, global, cognitive therapy stimulated many cognitive functions and thus led to a better performance in language processing and ADL/IADL. The subjective quality of life increased as well. The cognitive training (of working memory) improved only the ADL/IADL performance (more, however, than client-centered, global, cognitive stimulation) and stabilized the level of performance in the other three functional areas. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel S. Karger AG 2013-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3808226/ /pubmed/24174925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000354190 Text en Copyright © 2013 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Schecker, M.
Pirnay-Dummer, P.
Schmidtke, K.
Hentrich-Hesse, T.
Borchardt, D.
Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment
title Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment
title_full Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment
title_fullStr Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment
title_short Cognitive Interventions in Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Therapy-Evaluation Study on the Interaction of Medication and Cognitive Treatment
title_sort cognitive interventions in mild alzheimer's disease: a therapy-evaluation study on the interaction of medication and cognitive treatment
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000354190
work_keys_str_mv AT scheckerm cognitiveinterventionsinmildalzheimersdiseaseatherapyevaluationstudyontheinteractionofmedicationandcognitivetreatment
AT pirnaydummerp cognitiveinterventionsinmildalzheimersdiseaseatherapyevaluationstudyontheinteractionofmedicationandcognitivetreatment
AT schmidtkek cognitiveinterventionsinmildalzheimersdiseaseatherapyevaluationstudyontheinteractionofmedicationandcognitivetreatment
AT hentrichhesset cognitiveinterventionsinmildalzheimersdiseaseatherapyevaluationstudyontheinteractionofmedicationandcognitivetreatment
AT borchardtd cognitiveinterventionsinmildalzheimersdiseaseatherapyevaluationstudyontheinteractionofmedicationandcognitivetreatment