Cargando…

A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns

Salmonellosis is one of the most important foodborne diseases affecting humans. To characterize the relationship between Salmonella causing human infections and their food animal reservoirs, we compared pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of non-typhoida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandt, Carol H., Fedorka-Cray, Paula J., Tewari, Deepanker, Ostroff, Stephen, Joyce, Kevin, M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24204990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077836
_version_ 1782289147530051584
author Sandt, Carol H.
Fedorka-Cray, Paula J.
Tewari, Deepanker
Ostroff, Stephen
Joyce, Kevin
M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M.
author_facet Sandt, Carol H.
Fedorka-Cray, Paula J.
Tewari, Deepanker
Ostroff, Stephen
Joyce, Kevin
M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M.
author_sort Sandt, Carol H.
collection PubMed
description Salmonellosis is one of the most important foodborne diseases affecting humans. To characterize the relationship between Salmonella causing human infections and their food animal reservoirs, we compared pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from ill humans in Pennsylvania and from food animals before retail. Human clinical isolates were received from 2005 through 2011 during routine public health operations in Pennsylvania. Isolates from cattle, chickens, swine and turkeys were recovered during the same period from federally inspected slaughter and processing facilities in the northeastern United States. We found that subtyping Salmonella isolates by PFGE revealed differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and, for human Salmonella, differences in sources and invasiveness that were not evident from serotyping alone. Sixteen of the 20 most common human Salmonella PFGE patterns were identified in Salmonella recovered from food animals. The most common human Salmonella PFGE pattern, Enteritidis pattern JEGX01.0004 (JEGX01.0003ARS), was associated with more cases of invasive salmonellosis than all other patterns. In food animals, this pattern was almost exclusively (99%) found in Salmonella recovered from chickens and was present in poultry meat in every year of the study. Enteritidis pattern JEGX01.0004 (JEGX01.0003ARS) was associated with susceptibility to all antimicrobial agents tested in 94.7% of human and 97.2% of food animal Salmonella isolates. In contrast, multidrug resistance (resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents) was observed in five PFGE patterns. Typhimurium patterns JPXX01.0003 (JPXX01.0003 ARS) and JPXX01.0018 (JPXX01.0002 ARS), considered together, were associated with resistance to five or more classes of antimicrobial agents: ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamides and tetracycline (ACSSuT), in 92% of human and 80% of food animal Salmonella isolates. The information from our study can assist in source attribution, outbreak investigations, and tailoring of interventions to maximize their impact on prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3813714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38137142013-11-07 A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns Sandt, Carol H. Fedorka-Cray, Paula J. Tewari, Deepanker Ostroff, Stephen Joyce, Kevin M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M. PLoS One Research Article Salmonellosis is one of the most important foodborne diseases affecting humans. To characterize the relationship between Salmonella causing human infections and their food animal reservoirs, we compared pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from ill humans in Pennsylvania and from food animals before retail. Human clinical isolates were received from 2005 through 2011 during routine public health operations in Pennsylvania. Isolates from cattle, chickens, swine and turkeys were recovered during the same period from federally inspected slaughter and processing facilities in the northeastern United States. We found that subtyping Salmonella isolates by PFGE revealed differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and, for human Salmonella, differences in sources and invasiveness that were not evident from serotyping alone. Sixteen of the 20 most common human Salmonella PFGE patterns were identified in Salmonella recovered from food animals. The most common human Salmonella PFGE pattern, Enteritidis pattern JEGX01.0004 (JEGX01.0003ARS), was associated with more cases of invasive salmonellosis than all other patterns. In food animals, this pattern was almost exclusively (99%) found in Salmonella recovered from chickens and was present in poultry meat in every year of the study. Enteritidis pattern JEGX01.0004 (JEGX01.0003ARS) was associated with susceptibility to all antimicrobial agents tested in 94.7% of human and 97.2% of food animal Salmonella isolates. In contrast, multidrug resistance (resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents) was observed in five PFGE patterns. Typhimurium patterns JPXX01.0003 (JPXX01.0003 ARS) and JPXX01.0018 (JPXX01.0002 ARS), considered together, were associated with resistance to five or more classes of antimicrobial agents: ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamides and tetracycline (ACSSuT), in 92% of human and 80% of food animal Salmonella isolates. The information from our study can assist in source attribution, outbreak investigations, and tailoring of interventions to maximize their impact on prevention. Public Library of Science 2013-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3813714/ /pubmed/24204990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077836 Text en © 2013 Sandt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sandt, Carol H.
Fedorka-Cray, Paula J.
Tewari, Deepanker
Ostroff, Stephen
Joyce, Kevin
M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M.
A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns
title A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns
title_full A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns
title_fullStr A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns
title_short A Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella from Humans and Food Animals Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns
title_sort comparison of non-typhoidal salmonella from humans and food animals using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24204990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077836
work_keys_str_mv AT sandtcarolh acomparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT fedorkacraypaulaj acomparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT tewarideepanker acomparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT ostroffstephen acomparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT joycekevin acomparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT mikanathankuchiam acomparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT sandtcarolh comparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT fedorkacraypaulaj comparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT tewarideepanker comparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT ostroffstephen comparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT joycekevin comparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns
AT mikanathankuchiam comparisonofnontyphoidalsalmonellafromhumansandfoodanimalsusingpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresisandantimicrobialsusceptibilitypatterns