Cargando…

Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy

The most common technique used to detect ochratoxin A (OTA) in food matrices is based on extraction, clean-up, and chromatography detection. Different clean-up cartridges, such as immunoaffinity columns (IAC), molecular imprinting polymers (MIP), Mycosep™ 229, Mycospin™, and Oasis(®) HLB (Hydrophili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prelle, Ambra, Spadaro, Davide, Denca, Aleksandra, Garibaldi, Angelo, Gullino, Maria Lodovica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152987
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins5101827
_version_ 1782289178801733632
author Prelle, Ambra
Spadaro, Davide
Denca, Aleksandra
Garibaldi, Angelo
Gullino, Maria Lodovica
author_facet Prelle, Ambra
Spadaro, Davide
Denca, Aleksandra
Garibaldi, Angelo
Gullino, Maria Lodovica
author_sort Prelle, Ambra
collection PubMed
description The most common technique used to detect ochratoxin A (OTA) in food matrices is based on extraction, clean-up, and chromatography detection. Different clean-up cartridges, such as immunoaffinity columns (IAC), molecular imprinting polymers (MIP), Mycosep™ 229, Mycospin™, and Oasis(®) HLB (Hydrophilic Lipophilic balance) as solid phase extraction were tested to optimize the purification for red wine, beer, roasted coffee and chili. Recovery, reproducibility, reproducibility, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated for each clean-up method. IAC demonstrated to be suitable for OTA analysis in wine and beer with recovery rate >90%, as well as Mycosep™ for wine and chili. On the contrary, MIP columns were the most appropriate to clean up coffee. A total of 120 samples (30 wines, 30 beers, 30 roasted coffee, 30 chili) marketed in Italy were analyzed, by applying the developed clean-up methods. Twenty-seven out of 120 samples analyzed (22.7%: two wines, five beers, eight coffees, and 12 chili) resulted positive to OTA. A higher incidence of OTA was found in chili (40.0%) more than wine (6.6%), beers (16.6%) and coffee (26.6%). Moreover, OTA concentration in chili was the highest detected, reaching 47.8 µg/kg. Furthermore, three samples (2.5%), two wines and one chili, exceeded the European threshold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3813914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38139142013-10-31 Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy Prelle, Ambra Spadaro, Davide Denca, Aleksandra Garibaldi, Angelo Gullino, Maria Lodovica Toxins (Basel) Article The most common technique used to detect ochratoxin A (OTA) in food matrices is based on extraction, clean-up, and chromatography detection. Different clean-up cartridges, such as immunoaffinity columns (IAC), molecular imprinting polymers (MIP), Mycosep™ 229, Mycospin™, and Oasis(®) HLB (Hydrophilic Lipophilic balance) as solid phase extraction were tested to optimize the purification for red wine, beer, roasted coffee and chili. Recovery, reproducibility, reproducibility, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated for each clean-up method. IAC demonstrated to be suitable for OTA analysis in wine and beer with recovery rate >90%, as well as Mycosep™ for wine and chili. On the contrary, MIP columns were the most appropriate to clean up coffee. A total of 120 samples (30 wines, 30 beers, 30 roasted coffee, 30 chili) marketed in Italy were analyzed, by applying the developed clean-up methods. Twenty-seven out of 120 samples analyzed (22.7%: two wines, five beers, eight coffees, and 12 chili) resulted positive to OTA. A higher incidence of OTA was found in chili (40.0%) more than wine (6.6%), beers (16.6%) and coffee (26.6%). Moreover, OTA concentration in chili was the highest detected, reaching 47.8 µg/kg. Furthermore, three samples (2.5%), two wines and one chili, exceeded the European threshold. MDPI 2013-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3813914/ /pubmed/24152987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins5101827 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prelle, Ambra
Spadaro, Davide
Denca, Aleksandra
Garibaldi, Angelo
Gullino, Maria Lodovica
Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy
title Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy
title_full Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy
title_fullStr Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy
title_short Comparison of Clean-Up Methods for Ochratoxin A on Wine, Beer, Roasted Coffee and Chili Commercialized in Italy
title_sort comparison of clean-up methods for ochratoxin a on wine, beer, roasted coffee and chili commercialized in italy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152987
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins5101827
work_keys_str_mv AT prelleambra comparisonofcleanupmethodsforochratoxinaonwinebeerroastedcoffeeandchilicommercializedinitaly
AT spadarodavide comparisonofcleanupmethodsforochratoxinaonwinebeerroastedcoffeeandchilicommercializedinitaly
AT dencaaleksandra comparisonofcleanupmethodsforochratoxinaonwinebeerroastedcoffeeandchilicommercializedinitaly
AT garibaldiangelo comparisonofcleanupmethodsforochratoxinaonwinebeerroastedcoffeeandchilicommercializedinitaly
AT gullinomarialodovica comparisonofcleanupmethodsforochratoxinaonwinebeerroastedcoffeeandchilicommercializedinitaly