Cargando…
Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
Chromosome duplication normally initiates via the assembly of replication fork complexes at defined origins(1,2). DNA synthesis by any one fork is thought to cease when it meets another travelling in the opposite direction, at which stage the replication machinery may simply dissociate before the na...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12312 |
_version_ | 1782290061172146176 |
---|---|
author | Rudolph, Christian J. Upton, Amy L. Stockum, Anna Nieduszynski, Conrad A. Lloyd, Robert G. |
author_facet | Rudolph, Christian J. Upton, Amy L. Stockum, Anna Nieduszynski, Conrad A. Lloyd, Robert G. |
author_sort | Rudolph, Christian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chromosome duplication normally initiates via the assembly of replication fork complexes at defined origins(1,2). DNA synthesis by any one fork is thought to cease when it meets another travelling in the opposite direction, at which stage the replication machinery may simply dissociate before the nascent strands are finally ligated. But what actually happens is not clear. Here we present evidence consistent with the idea that every fork collision has the potential to threaten genomic integrity. In Escherichia coli this threat is kept at bay by RecG DNA translocase(3) and by single-strand DNA exonucleases. Without RecG, replication initiates where forks meet via a replisome assembly mechanism normally associated with fork repair, replication restart and recombination(4,5), establishing new forks with the potential to sustain cell growth and division without an active origin. This potential is realised when roadblocks to fork progression are reduced or eliminated. It relies on the chromosome being circular, reinforcing the idea that replication initiation is triggered repeatedly by fork collision. The results reported raise the question of whether replication fork collisions have pathogenic potential for organisms that exploit multiple origins to replicate each chromosome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3819906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38199062014-02-28 Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide Rudolph, Christian J. Upton, Amy L. Stockum, Anna Nieduszynski, Conrad A. Lloyd, Robert G. Nature Article Chromosome duplication normally initiates via the assembly of replication fork complexes at defined origins(1,2). DNA synthesis by any one fork is thought to cease when it meets another travelling in the opposite direction, at which stage the replication machinery may simply dissociate before the nascent strands are finally ligated. But what actually happens is not clear. Here we present evidence consistent with the idea that every fork collision has the potential to threaten genomic integrity. In Escherichia coli this threat is kept at bay by RecG DNA translocase(3) and by single-strand DNA exonucleases. Without RecG, replication initiates where forks meet via a replisome assembly mechanism normally associated with fork repair, replication restart and recombination(4,5), establishing new forks with the potential to sustain cell growth and division without an active origin. This potential is realised when roadblocks to fork progression are reduced or eliminated. It relies on the chromosome being circular, reinforcing the idea that replication initiation is triggered repeatedly by fork collision. The results reported raise the question of whether replication fork collisions have pathogenic potential for organisms that exploit multiple origins to replicate each chromosome. 2013-07-28 2013-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3819906/ /pubmed/23892781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12312 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Rudolph, Christian J. Upton, Amy L. Stockum, Anna Nieduszynski, Conrad A. Lloyd, Robert G. Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide |
title | Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide |
title_full | Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide |
title_fullStr | Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide |
title_full_unstemmed | Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide |
title_short | Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide |
title_sort | avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rudolphchristianj avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide AT uptonamyl avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide AT stockumanna avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide AT nieduszynskiconrada avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide AT lloydrobertg avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide |