Cargando…

Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide

Chromosome duplication normally initiates via the assembly of replication fork complexes at defined origins(1,2). DNA synthesis by any one fork is thought to cease when it meets another travelling in the opposite direction, at which stage the replication machinery may simply dissociate before the na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudolph, Christian J., Upton, Amy L., Stockum, Anna, Nieduszynski, Conrad A., Lloyd, Robert G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12312
_version_ 1782290061172146176
author Rudolph, Christian J.
Upton, Amy L.
Stockum, Anna
Nieduszynski, Conrad A.
Lloyd, Robert G.
author_facet Rudolph, Christian J.
Upton, Amy L.
Stockum, Anna
Nieduszynski, Conrad A.
Lloyd, Robert G.
author_sort Rudolph, Christian J.
collection PubMed
description Chromosome duplication normally initiates via the assembly of replication fork complexes at defined origins(1,2). DNA synthesis by any one fork is thought to cease when it meets another travelling in the opposite direction, at which stage the replication machinery may simply dissociate before the nascent strands are finally ligated. But what actually happens is not clear. Here we present evidence consistent with the idea that every fork collision has the potential to threaten genomic integrity. In Escherichia coli this threat is kept at bay by RecG DNA translocase(3) and by single-strand DNA exonucleases. Without RecG, replication initiates where forks meet via a replisome assembly mechanism normally associated with fork repair, replication restart and recombination(4,5), establishing new forks with the potential to sustain cell growth and division without an active origin. This potential is realised when roadblocks to fork progression are reduced or eliminated. It relies on the chromosome being circular, reinforcing the idea that replication initiation is triggered repeatedly by fork collision. The results reported raise the question of whether replication fork collisions have pathogenic potential for organisms that exploit multiple origins to replicate each chromosome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3819906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38199062014-02-28 Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide Rudolph, Christian J. Upton, Amy L. Stockum, Anna Nieduszynski, Conrad A. Lloyd, Robert G. Nature Article Chromosome duplication normally initiates via the assembly of replication fork complexes at defined origins(1,2). DNA synthesis by any one fork is thought to cease when it meets another travelling in the opposite direction, at which stage the replication machinery may simply dissociate before the nascent strands are finally ligated. But what actually happens is not clear. Here we present evidence consistent with the idea that every fork collision has the potential to threaten genomic integrity. In Escherichia coli this threat is kept at bay by RecG DNA translocase(3) and by single-strand DNA exonucleases. Without RecG, replication initiates where forks meet via a replisome assembly mechanism normally associated with fork repair, replication restart and recombination(4,5), establishing new forks with the potential to sustain cell growth and division without an active origin. This potential is realised when roadblocks to fork progression are reduced or eliminated. It relies on the chromosome being circular, reinforcing the idea that replication initiation is triggered repeatedly by fork collision. The results reported raise the question of whether replication fork collisions have pathogenic potential for organisms that exploit multiple origins to replicate each chromosome. 2013-07-28 2013-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3819906/ /pubmed/23892781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12312 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Rudolph, Christian J.
Upton, Amy L.
Stockum, Anna
Nieduszynski, Conrad A.
Lloyd, Robert G.
Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
title Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
title_full Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
title_fullStr Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
title_short Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
title_sort avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12312
work_keys_str_mv AT rudolphchristianj avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide
AT uptonamyl avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide
AT stockumanna avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide
AT nieduszynskiconrada avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide
AT lloydrobertg avoidingchromosomepathologywhenreplicationforkscollide