Cargando…
In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding
Phenotypic screens can identify molecules that are at once penetrant and active on the integrated circuitry of a whole cell or organism. These advantages are offset by the need to identify the targets underlying the phenotypes. Additionally, logistical considerations limit screening for certain phys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001712 |
_version_ | 1782291909459312640 |
---|---|
author | Lemieux, George A. Keiser, Michael J. Sassano, Maria F. Laggner, Christian Mayer, Fahima Bainton, Roland J. Werb, Zena Roth, Bryan L. Shoichet, Brian K. Ashrafi, Kaveh |
author_facet | Lemieux, George A. Keiser, Michael J. Sassano, Maria F. Laggner, Christian Mayer, Fahima Bainton, Roland J. Werb, Zena Roth, Bryan L. Shoichet, Brian K. Ashrafi, Kaveh |
author_sort | Lemieux, George A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phenotypic screens can identify molecules that are at once penetrant and active on the integrated circuitry of a whole cell or organism. These advantages are offset by the need to identify the targets underlying the phenotypes. Additionally, logistical considerations limit screening for certain physiological and behavioral phenotypes to organisms such as zebrafish and C. elegans. This further raises the challenge of elucidating whether compound-target relationships found in model organisms are preserved in humans. To address these challenges we searched for compounds that affect feeding behavior in C. elegans and sought to identify their molecular mechanisms of action. Here, we applied predictive chemoinformatics to small molecules previously identified in a C. elegans phenotypic screen likely to be enriched for feeding regulatory compounds. Based on the predictions, 16 of these compounds were tested in vitro against 20 mammalian targets. Of these, nine were active, with affinities ranging from 9 nM to 10 µM. Four of these nine compounds were found to alter feeding. We then verified the in vitro findings in vivo through genetic knockdowns, the use of previously characterized compounds with high affinity for the four targets, and chemical genetic epistasis, which is the effect of combined chemical and genetic perturbations on a phenotype relative to that of each perturbation in isolation. Our findings reveal four previously unrecognized pathways that regulate feeding in C. elegans with strong parallels in mammals. Together, our study addresses three inherent challenges in phenotypic screening: the identification of the molecular targets from a phenotypic screen, the confirmation of the in vivo relevance of these targets, and the evolutionary conservation and relevance of these targets to their human orthologs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3833878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38338782013-11-20 In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding Lemieux, George A. Keiser, Michael J. Sassano, Maria F. Laggner, Christian Mayer, Fahima Bainton, Roland J. Werb, Zena Roth, Bryan L. Shoichet, Brian K. Ashrafi, Kaveh PLoS Biol Research Article Phenotypic screens can identify molecules that are at once penetrant and active on the integrated circuitry of a whole cell or organism. These advantages are offset by the need to identify the targets underlying the phenotypes. Additionally, logistical considerations limit screening for certain physiological and behavioral phenotypes to organisms such as zebrafish and C. elegans. This further raises the challenge of elucidating whether compound-target relationships found in model organisms are preserved in humans. To address these challenges we searched for compounds that affect feeding behavior in C. elegans and sought to identify their molecular mechanisms of action. Here, we applied predictive chemoinformatics to small molecules previously identified in a C. elegans phenotypic screen likely to be enriched for feeding regulatory compounds. Based on the predictions, 16 of these compounds were tested in vitro against 20 mammalian targets. Of these, nine were active, with affinities ranging from 9 nM to 10 µM. Four of these nine compounds were found to alter feeding. We then verified the in vitro findings in vivo through genetic knockdowns, the use of previously characterized compounds with high affinity for the four targets, and chemical genetic epistasis, which is the effect of combined chemical and genetic perturbations on a phenotype relative to that of each perturbation in isolation. Our findings reveal four previously unrecognized pathways that regulate feeding in C. elegans with strong parallels in mammals. Together, our study addresses three inherent challenges in phenotypic screening: the identification of the molecular targets from a phenotypic screen, the confirmation of the in vivo relevance of these targets, and the evolutionary conservation and relevance of these targets to their human orthologs. Public Library of Science 2013-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3833878/ /pubmed/24260022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001712 Text en © 2013 Lemieux et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lemieux, George A. Keiser, Michael J. Sassano, Maria F. Laggner, Christian Mayer, Fahima Bainton, Roland J. Werb, Zena Roth, Bryan L. Shoichet, Brian K. Ashrafi, Kaveh In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding |
title |
In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding |
title_full |
In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding |
title_fullStr |
In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding |
title_short |
In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding |
title_sort | in silico molecular comparisons of c. elegans and mammalian pharmacology identify distinct targets that regulate feeding |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lemieuxgeorgea insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT keisermichaelj insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT sassanomariaf insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT laggnerchristian insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT mayerfahima insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT baintonrolandj insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT werbzena insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT rothbryanl insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT shoichetbriank insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding AT ashrafikaveh insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding |