Cargando…

In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding

Phenotypic screens can identify molecules that are at once penetrant and active on the integrated circuitry of a whole cell or organism. These advantages are offset by the need to identify the targets underlying the phenotypes. Additionally, logistical considerations limit screening for certain phys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemieux, George A., Keiser, Michael J., Sassano, Maria F., Laggner, Christian, Mayer, Fahima, Bainton, Roland J., Werb, Zena, Roth, Bryan L., Shoichet, Brian K., Ashrafi, Kaveh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001712
_version_ 1782291909459312640
author Lemieux, George A.
Keiser, Michael J.
Sassano, Maria F.
Laggner, Christian
Mayer, Fahima
Bainton, Roland J.
Werb, Zena
Roth, Bryan L.
Shoichet, Brian K.
Ashrafi, Kaveh
author_facet Lemieux, George A.
Keiser, Michael J.
Sassano, Maria F.
Laggner, Christian
Mayer, Fahima
Bainton, Roland J.
Werb, Zena
Roth, Bryan L.
Shoichet, Brian K.
Ashrafi, Kaveh
author_sort Lemieux, George A.
collection PubMed
description Phenotypic screens can identify molecules that are at once penetrant and active on the integrated circuitry of a whole cell or organism. These advantages are offset by the need to identify the targets underlying the phenotypes. Additionally, logistical considerations limit screening for certain physiological and behavioral phenotypes to organisms such as zebrafish and C. elegans. This further raises the challenge of elucidating whether compound-target relationships found in model organisms are preserved in humans. To address these challenges we searched for compounds that affect feeding behavior in C. elegans and sought to identify their molecular mechanisms of action. Here, we applied predictive chemoinformatics to small molecules previously identified in a C. elegans phenotypic screen likely to be enriched for feeding regulatory compounds. Based on the predictions, 16 of these compounds were tested in vitro against 20 mammalian targets. Of these, nine were active, with affinities ranging from 9 nM to 10 µM. Four of these nine compounds were found to alter feeding. We then verified the in vitro findings in vivo through genetic knockdowns, the use of previously characterized compounds with high affinity for the four targets, and chemical genetic epistasis, which is the effect of combined chemical and genetic perturbations on a phenotype relative to that of each perturbation in isolation. Our findings reveal four previously unrecognized pathways that regulate feeding in C. elegans with strong parallels in mammals. Together, our study addresses three inherent challenges in phenotypic screening: the identification of the molecular targets from a phenotypic screen, the confirmation of the in vivo relevance of these targets, and the evolutionary conservation and relevance of these targets to their human orthologs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3833878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38338782013-11-20 In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding Lemieux, George A. Keiser, Michael J. Sassano, Maria F. Laggner, Christian Mayer, Fahima Bainton, Roland J. Werb, Zena Roth, Bryan L. Shoichet, Brian K. Ashrafi, Kaveh PLoS Biol Research Article Phenotypic screens can identify molecules that are at once penetrant and active on the integrated circuitry of a whole cell or organism. These advantages are offset by the need to identify the targets underlying the phenotypes. Additionally, logistical considerations limit screening for certain physiological and behavioral phenotypes to organisms such as zebrafish and C. elegans. This further raises the challenge of elucidating whether compound-target relationships found in model organisms are preserved in humans. To address these challenges we searched for compounds that affect feeding behavior in C. elegans and sought to identify their molecular mechanisms of action. Here, we applied predictive chemoinformatics to small molecules previously identified in a C. elegans phenotypic screen likely to be enriched for feeding regulatory compounds. Based on the predictions, 16 of these compounds were tested in vitro against 20 mammalian targets. Of these, nine were active, with affinities ranging from 9 nM to 10 µM. Four of these nine compounds were found to alter feeding. We then verified the in vitro findings in vivo through genetic knockdowns, the use of previously characterized compounds with high affinity for the four targets, and chemical genetic epistasis, which is the effect of combined chemical and genetic perturbations on a phenotype relative to that of each perturbation in isolation. Our findings reveal four previously unrecognized pathways that regulate feeding in C. elegans with strong parallels in mammals. Together, our study addresses three inherent challenges in phenotypic screening: the identification of the molecular targets from a phenotypic screen, the confirmation of the in vivo relevance of these targets, and the evolutionary conservation and relevance of these targets to their human orthologs. Public Library of Science 2013-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3833878/ /pubmed/24260022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001712 Text en © 2013 Lemieux et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lemieux, George A.
Keiser, Michael J.
Sassano, Maria F.
Laggner, Christian
Mayer, Fahima
Bainton, Roland J.
Werb, Zena
Roth, Bryan L.
Shoichet, Brian K.
Ashrafi, Kaveh
In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding
title In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding
title_full In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding
title_fullStr In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding
title_full_unstemmed In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding
title_short In Silico Molecular Comparisons of C. elegans and Mammalian Pharmacology Identify Distinct Targets That Regulate Feeding
title_sort in silico molecular comparisons of c. elegans and mammalian pharmacology identify distinct targets that regulate feeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001712
work_keys_str_mv AT lemieuxgeorgea insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT keisermichaelj insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT sassanomariaf insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT laggnerchristian insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT mayerfahima insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT baintonrolandj insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT werbzena insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT rothbryanl insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT shoichetbriank insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding
AT ashrafikaveh insilicomolecularcomparisonsofcelegansandmammalianpharmacologyidentifydistincttargetsthatregulatefeeding