Cargando…

How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?

BACKGROUND: The linear noise approximation (LNA) is commonly used to predict how noise is regulated and exploited at the cellular level. These predictions are exact for reaction networks composed exclusively of first order reactions or for networks involving bimolecular reactions and large numbers o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Philipp, Matuschek, Hannes, Grima, Ramon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24266939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-S4-S5
_version_ 1782293945898762240
author Thomas, Philipp
Matuschek, Hannes
Grima, Ramon
author_facet Thomas, Philipp
Matuschek, Hannes
Grima, Ramon
author_sort Thomas, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The linear noise approximation (LNA) is commonly used to predict how noise is regulated and exploited at the cellular level. These predictions are exact for reaction networks composed exclusively of first order reactions or for networks involving bimolecular reactions and large numbers of molecules. It is however well known that gene regulation involves bimolecular interactions with molecule numbers as small as a single copy of a particular gene. It is therefore questionable how reliable are the LNA predictions for these systems. RESULTS: We implement in the software package intrinsic Noise Analyzer (iNA), a system size expansion based method which calculates the mean concentrations and the variances of the fluctuations to an order of accuracy higher than the LNA. We then use iNA to explore the parametric dependence of the Fano factors and of the coefficients of variation of the mRNA and protein fluctuations in models of genetic networks involving nonlinear protein degradation, post-transcriptional, post-translational and negative feedback regulation. We find that the LNA can significantly underestimate the amplitude and period of noise-induced oscillations in genetic oscillators. We also identify cases where the LNA predicts that noise levels can be optimized by tuning a bimolecular rate constant whereas our method shows that no such regulation is possible. All our results are confirmed by stochastic simulations. CONCLUSION: The software iNA allows the investigation of parameter regimes where the LNA fares well and where it does not. We have shown that the parametric dependence of the coefficients of variation and Fano factors for common gene regulatory networks is better described by including terms of higher order than LNA in the system size expansion. This analysis is considerably faster than stochastic simulations due to the extensive ensemble averaging needed to obtain statistically meaningful results. Hence iNA is well suited for performing computationally efficient and quantitative studies of intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3849541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38495412013-12-06 How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks? Thomas, Philipp Matuschek, Hannes Grima, Ramon BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: The linear noise approximation (LNA) is commonly used to predict how noise is regulated and exploited at the cellular level. These predictions are exact for reaction networks composed exclusively of first order reactions or for networks involving bimolecular reactions and large numbers of molecules. It is however well known that gene regulation involves bimolecular interactions with molecule numbers as small as a single copy of a particular gene. It is therefore questionable how reliable are the LNA predictions for these systems. RESULTS: We implement in the software package intrinsic Noise Analyzer (iNA), a system size expansion based method which calculates the mean concentrations and the variances of the fluctuations to an order of accuracy higher than the LNA. We then use iNA to explore the parametric dependence of the Fano factors and of the coefficients of variation of the mRNA and protein fluctuations in models of genetic networks involving nonlinear protein degradation, post-transcriptional, post-translational and negative feedback regulation. We find that the LNA can significantly underestimate the amplitude and period of noise-induced oscillations in genetic oscillators. We also identify cases where the LNA predicts that noise levels can be optimized by tuning a bimolecular rate constant whereas our method shows that no such regulation is possible. All our results are confirmed by stochastic simulations. CONCLUSION: The software iNA allows the investigation of parameter regimes where the LNA fares well and where it does not. We have shown that the parametric dependence of the coefficients of variation and Fano factors for common gene regulatory networks is better described by including terms of higher order than LNA in the system size expansion. This analysis is considerably faster than stochastic simulations due to the extensive ensemble averaging needed to obtain statistically meaningful results. Hence iNA is well suited for performing computationally efficient and quantitative studies of intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. BioMed Central 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3849541/ /pubmed/24266939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-S4-S5 Text en Copyright © 2013 Thomas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Thomas, Philipp
Matuschek, Hannes
Grima, Ramon
How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
title How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
title_full How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
title_fullStr How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
title_full_unstemmed How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
title_short How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
title_sort how reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24266939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-S4-S5
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasphilipp howreliableisthelinearnoiseapproximationofgeneregulatorynetworks
AT matuschekhannes howreliableisthelinearnoiseapproximationofgeneregulatorynetworks
AT grimaramon howreliableisthelinearnoiseapproximationofgeneregulatorynetworks