Cargando…

Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development

Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from somatic cells of patients have opened possibilities for in vitro modeling of the physiology of neural (and other) cells in psychiatric disease states. Issues in early stages of technology development include (1) establishing a library of cel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tobe, Brian T D, Brandel, Michael G, Nye, Jeffrey S, Snyder, Evan Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24232258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.124
_version_ 1782293953259765760
author Tobe, Brian T D
Brandel, Michael G
Nye, Jeffrey S
Snyder, Evan Y
author_facet Tobe, Brian T D
Brandel, Michael G
Nye, Jeffrey S
Snyder, Evan Y
author_sort Tobe, Brian T D
collection PubMed
description Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from somatic cells of patients have opened possibilities for in vitro modeling of the physiology of neural (and other) cells in psychiatric disease states. Issues in early stages of technology development include (1) establishing a library of cells from adequately phenotyped patients, (2) streamlining laborious, costly hiPSC derivation and characterization, (3) assessing whether mutations or other alterations introduced by reprogramming confound interpretation, (4) developing efficient differentiation strategies to relevant cell types, (5) identifying discernible cellular phenotypes meaningful for cyclic, stress induced or relapsing–remitting diseases, (6) converting phenotypes to screening assays suitable for genome-wide mechanistic studies or large collection compound testing and (7) controlling for variability in relation to disease specificity amidst low sample numbers. Coordination of material for reprogramming from patients well-characterized clinically, genetically and with neuroimaging are beginning, and initial studies have begun to identify cellular phenotypes. Finally, several psychiatric drugs have been found to alter reprogramming efficiency in vitro, suggesting further complexity in applying hiPSCs to psychiatric diseases or that some drugs influence neural differentiation moreso than generally recognized. Despite these challenges, studies utilizing hiPSCs may eventually serve to fill essential niches in the translational pipeline for the discovery of new therapeutics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3849573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38495732013-12-06 Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development Tobe, Brian T D Brandel, Michael G Nye, Jeffrey S Snyder, Evan Y Exp Mol Med Review Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from somatic cells of patients have opened possibilities for in vitro modeling of the physiology of neural (and other) cells in psychiatric disease states. Issues in early stages of technology development include (1) establishing a library of cells from adequately phenotyped patients, (2) streamlining laborious, costly hiPSC derivation and characterization, (3) assessing whether mutations or other alterations introduced by reprogramming confound interpretation, (4) developing efficient differentiation strategies to relevant cell types, (5) identifying discernible cellular phenotypes meaningful for cyclic, stress induced or relapsing–remitting diseases, (6) converting phenotypes to screening assays suitable for genome-wide mechanistic studies or large collection compound testing and (7) controlling for variability in relation to disease specificity amidst low sample numbers. Coordination of material for reprogramming from patients well-characterized clinically, genetically and with neuroimaging are beginning, and initial studies have begun to identify cellular phenotypes. Finally, several psychiatric drugs have been found to alter reprogramming efficiency in vitro, suggesting further complexity in applying hiPSCs to psychiatric diseases or that some drugs influence neural differentiation moreso than generally recognized. Despite these challenges, studies utilizing hiPSCs may eventually serve to fill essential niches in the translational pipeline for the discovery of new therapeutics. Nature Publishing Group 2013-11 2013-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3849573/ /pubmed/24232258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.124 Text en Copyright © 2013 KSBMB. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Review
Tobe, Brian T D
Brandel, Michael G
Nye, Jeffrey S
Snyder, Evan Y
Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development
title Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development
title_full Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development
title_fullStr Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development
title_full_unstemmed Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development
title_short Implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development
title_sort implications and limitations of cellular reprogramming for psychiatric drug development
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24232258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.124
work_keys_str_mv AT tobebriantd implicationsandlimitationsofcellularreprogrammingforpsychiatricdrugdevelopment
AT brandelmichaelg implicationsandlimitationsofcellularreprogrammingforpsychiatricdrugdevelopment
AT nyejeffreys implicationsandlimitationsofcellularreprogrammingforpsychiatricdrugdevelopment
AT snyderevany implicationsandlimitationsofcellularreprogrammingforpsychiatricdrugdevelopment