Cargando…

The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the perceptions of cigarette packaging and the potential impact of plain packaging regulations. The hypothesis was that the branded cigarette packages would be rated more positively than the corresponding plain packs with and without descriptors. DESIGN: Between-subje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheffels, Janne, Lund, Ingeborg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24309171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003732
_version_ 1782294937677594624
author Scheffels, Janne
Lund, Ingeborg
author_facet Scheffels, Janne
Lund, Ingeborg
author_sort Scheffels, Janne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study examined the perceptions of cigarette packaging and the potential impact of plain packaging regulations. The hypothesis was that the branded cigarette packages would be rated more positively than the corresponding plain packs with and without descriptors. DESIGN: Between-subjects experimental online survey. Male and female participants were separately randomised to one of the three experimental conditions: fully branded cigarette packs, plain packs with descriptors and plain packs without descriptors; participants were asked to evaluate 12 individual cigarette packages. The participants were also asked to compare five pairs of packs from the same brand family. SETTING: Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 1010 youths and adults aged 15–22. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratings of appeal, taste and harmfulness for individual packages. Ratings of taste, harm, quality, ‘would rather try’ and ‘easier to quit’ for pairs of packages. RESULTS: Plain with and without descriptors packs were rated less positively than the branded packs on appeal (index score 1.63/1.61 vs 2.42, p<0.001), taste (index score 1.21/1.12 vs 1.70, p<0.001) and as less harmful (index score 1.0.34/0.36 vs 0.82, p<0.001) among females. Among males, the difference between the plain with and without descriptors versus branded condition was significant for appeal (index score 2.08/1.92 vs 2.58, p<0.005) and between the plain without descriptors versus branded condition for taste (index score 1.18 vs 1.70, p<0.00). The pack comparison task showed that the packs with descriptors suggesting a lower content of harmful substances, together with lighter colours, were more positively rated in the branded compared with the plain condition on dimensions less harmful (β −0.77, 95% CI −0.97 to −0.56), would rather try (β −0.32, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.14) and easier to quit (β −0.58, 95% CI −0.76 to −0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a shift from branded to plain cigarette packaging could lead to a reduction in positive perceptions of cigarettes among young people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3855557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38555572013-12-09 The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey Scheffels, Janne Lund, Ingeborg BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: This study examined the perceptions of cigarette packaging and the potential impact of plain packaging regulations. The hypothesis was that the branded cigarette packages would be rated more positively than the corresponding plain packs with and without descriptors. DESIGN: Between-subjects experimental online survey. Male and female participants were separately randomised to one of the three experimental conditions: fully branded cigarette packs, plain packs with descriptors and plain packs without descriptors; participants were asked to evaluate 12 individual cigarette packages. The participants were also asked to compare five pairs of packs from the same brand family. SETTING: Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 1010 youths and adults aged 15–22. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratings of appeal, taste and harmfulness for individual packages. Ratings of taste, harm, quality, ‘would rather try’ and ‘easier to quit’ for pairs of packages. RESULTS: Plain with and without descriptors packs were rated less positively than the branded packs on appeal (index score 1.63/1.61 vs 2.42, p<0.001), taste (index score 1.21/1.12 vs 1.70, p<0.001) and as less harmful (index score 1.0.34/0.36 vs 0.82, p<0.001) among females. Among males, the difference between the plain with and without descriptors versus branded condition was significant for appeal (index score 2.08/1.92 vs 2.58, p<0.005) and between the plain without descriptors versus branded condition for taste (index score 1.18 vs 1.70, p<0.00). The pack comparison task showed that the packs with descriptors suggesting a lower content of harmful substances, together with lighter colours, were more positively rated in the branded compared with the plain condition on dimensions less harmful (β −0.77, 95% CI −0.97 to −0.56), would rather try (β −0.32, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.14) and easier to quit (β −0.58, 95% CI −0.76 to −0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a shift from branded to plain cigarette packaging could lead to a reduction in positive perceptions of cigarettes among young people. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3855557/ /pubmed/24309171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003732 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Scheffels, Janne
Lund, Ingeborg
The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey
title The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey
title_full The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey
title_fullStr The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey
title_full_unstemmed The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey
title_short The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey
title_sort impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in norway: a between-subjects experimental survey
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24309171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003732
work_keys_str_mv AT scheffelsjanne theimpactofcigarettebrandingandplainpackagingonperceptionsofproductappealandriskamongyoungadultsinnorwayabetweensubjectsexperimentalsurvey
AT lundingeborg theimpactofcigarettebrandingandplainpackagingonperceptionsofproductappealandriskamongyoungadultsinnorwayabetweensubjectsexperimentalsurvey
AT scheffelsjanne impactofcigarettebrandingandplainpackagingonperceptionsofproductappealandriskamongyoungadultsinnorwayabetweensubjectsexperimentalsurvey
AT lundingeborg impactofcigarettebrandingandplainpackagingonperceptionsofproductappealandriskamongyoungadultsinnorwayabetweensubjectsexperimentalsurvey