Cargando…

Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases are defined as life-threatening or chronically debilitating diseases with a prevalence of 50 out of 100,000 individuals or less. Orphan medicinal products (OMPs) are intended for the treatment of rare diseases. The assessment of quality of evidence in small populations is o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Picavet, Eline, Cassiman, David, Aertgeerts, Bert, Simoens, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24107467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-157
_version_ 1782295092161150976
author Picavet, Eline
Cassiman, David
Aertgeerts, Bert
Simoens, Steven
author_facet Picavet, Eline
Cassiman, David
Aertgeerts, Bert
Simoens, Steven
author_sort Picavet, Eline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rare diseases are defined as life-threatening or chronically debilitating diseases with a prevalence of 50 out of 100,000 individuals or less. Orphan medicinal products (OMPs) are intended for the treatment of rare diseases. The assessment of quality of evidence in small populations is often complex. Many generic tools are unfit. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate a new tool to assess the quality of OMPs' clinical evidence (COMPASS). METHODS: Firstly, a draft version of the COMPASS tool, developed by the authors and consisting of three parts, was amended based on suggestions obtained in four rounds of expert consultation. Secondly, the tool was put through three rounds of validation. The data source was information provided on the Orphanet website and in European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) document of the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS: The first pilot round revealed a high (92.2%) inter-rater agreement for part one of the tool. After further improvements, the final inter-rater agreement was 86.4% for part two (on methodological quality) and three (on quality of reporting) of the tool. The COMPASS tool does not attempt to score or rank the quality of clinical evidence, but rather to give an outline of various, key elements with respect to quality of clinical evidence of OMP studies. CONCLUSIONS: The COMPASS tool can be applied to assess the quality of evidence of an OMP based on information in the registration dossier, for example by local reimbursement agencies, pharmacists or clinicians. In that way, the tool can contribute to making reimbursement and/or treatment decisions increasingly more founded on the principles of evidence-based decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3856624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38566242013-12-10 Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool Picavet, Eline Cassiman, David Aertgeerts, Bert Simoens, Steven Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Rare diseases are defined as life-threatening or chronically debilitating diseases with a prevalence of 50 out of 100,000 individuals or less. Orphan medicinal products (OMPs) are intended for the treatment of rare diseases. The assessment of quality of evidence in small populations is often complex. Many generic tools are unfit. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate a new tool to assess the quality of OMPs' clinical evidence (COMPASS). METHODS: Firstly, a draft version of the COMPASS tool, developed by the authors and consisting of three parts, was amended based on suggestions obtained in four rounds of expert consultation. Secondly, the tool was put through three rounds of validation. The data source was information provided on the Orphanet website and in European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) document of the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS: The first pilot round revealed a high (92.2%) inter-rater agreement for part one of the tool. After further improvements, the final inter-rater agreement was 86.4% for part two (on methodological quality) and three (on quality of reporting) of the tool. The COMPASS tool does not attempt to score or rank the quality of clinical evidence, but rather to give an outline of various, key elements with respect to quality of clinical evidence of OMP studies. CONCLUSIONS: The COMPASS tool can be applied to assess the quality of evidence of an OMP based on information in the registration dossier, for example by local reimbursement agencies, pharmacists or clinicians. In that way, the tool can contribute to making reimbursement and/or treatment decisions increasingly more founded on the principles of evidence-based decision making. BioMed Central 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3856624/ /pubmed/24107467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-157 Text en Copyright © 2013 Picavet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Picavet, Eline
Cassiman, David
Aertgeerts, Bert
Simoens, Steven
Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool
title Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool
title_full Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool
title_fullStr Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool
title_short Development and validation of COMPASS: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool
title_sort development and validation of compass: clinical evidence of orphan medicinal products – an assessment tool
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24107467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-157
work_keys_str_mv AT picaveteline developmentandvalidationofcompassclinicalevidenceoforphanmedicinalproductsanassessmenttool
AT cassimandavid developmentandvalidationofcompassclinicalevidenceoforphanmedicinalproductsanassessmenttool
AT aertgeertsbert developmentandvalidationofcompassclinicalevidenceoforphanmedicinalproductsanassessmenttool
AT simoenssteven developmentandvalidationofcompassclinicalevidenceoforphanmedicinalproductsanassessmenttool