Cargando…

Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Teacher training may improve teaching effectiveness, but it might also have paradoxical effects. Research on expertise development suggests that the integration of new strategies may result in a temporary deterioration of performance until higher levels of competence are reached. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breckwoldt, Jan, Svensson, Jörg, Lingemann, Christian, Gruber, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-6
_version_ 1782299680178176000
author Breckwoldt, Jan
Svensson, Jörg
Lingemann, Christian
Gruber, Hans
author_facet Breckwoldt, Jan
Svensson, Jörg
Lingemann, Christian
Gruber, Hans
author_sort Breckwoldt, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Teacher training may improve teaching effectiveness, but it might also have paradoxical effects. Research on expertise development suggests that the integration of new strategies may result in a temporary deterioration of performance until higher levels of competence are reached. In this study, the impact of a clinical teacher training on teaching effectiveness was assessed in an intensive course in emergency medicine. As primary study outcome students’ practical skills at the end of their course were chosen. METHODS: The authors matched 18 clinical teachers according to clinical experience and teaching experience and then randomly assigned them to a two-day-teacher training, or no training. After 14 days, both groups taught within a 12-hour intensive course in emergency medicine for undergraduate students. The course followed a clearly defined curriculum. After the course students were assessed by structured clinical examination (SCE) and MCQ. The teaching quality was rated by students using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Data for 96 students with trained teachers, and 97 students with untrained teachers were included. Students taught by untrained teachers performed better in the SCE domains ‘alarm call’ (p < 0.01) and ‘ventilation’ (p = 0.01), while the domains ‘chest compressions’ and ‘use of automated defibrillator’ did not differ. MCQ scores revealed no statistical difference. Overall, teaching quality was rated significantly better by students of untrained teachers (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At the end of a structured intensive course in emergency medicine, students of trained clinical teachers performed worse in 2 of 4 practical SCE domains compared to students of untrained teachers. In addition, subjective evaluations of teaching quality were worse in the group of trained teachers. Difficulties in integrating new strategies in their teaching styles might be a possible explanation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3893403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38934032014-01-17 Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study Breckwoldt, Jan Svensson, Jörg Lingemann, Christian Gruber, Hans BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Teacher training may improve teaching effectiveness, but it might also have paradoxical effects. Research on expertise development suggests that the integration of new strategies may result in a temporary deterioration of performance until higher levels of competence are reached. In this study, the impact of a clinical teacher training on teaching effectiveness was assessed in an intensive course in emergency medicine. As primary study outcome students’ practical skills at the end of their course were chosen. METHODS: The authors matched 18 clinical teachers according to clinical experience and teaching experience and then randomly assigned them to a two-day-teacher training, or no training. After 14 days, both groups taught within a 12-hour intensive course in emergency medicine for undergraduate students. The course followed a clearly defined curriculum. After the course students were assessed by structured clinical examination (SCE) and MCQ. The teaching quality was rated by students using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Data for 96 students with trained teachers, and 97 students with untrained teachers were included. Students taught by untrained teachers performed better in the SCE domains ‘alarm call’ (p < 0.01) and ‘ventilation’ (p = 0.01), while the domains ‘chest compressions’ and ‘use of automated defibrillator’ did not differ. MCQ scores revealed no statistical difference. Overall, teaching quality was rated significantly better by students of untrained teachers (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At the end of a structured intensive course in emergency medicine, students of trained clinical teachers performed worse in 2 of 4 practical SCE domains compared to students of untrained teachers. In addition, subjective evaluations of teaching quality were worse in the group of trained teachers. Difficulties in integrating new strategies in their teaching styles might be a possible explanation. BioMed Central 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3893403/ /pubmed/24400838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-6 Text en Copyright © 2014 Breckwoldt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Breckwoldt, Jan
Svensson, Jörg
Lingemann, Christian
Gruber, Hans
Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study
title Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study
title_full Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study
title_short Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study
title_sort does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-6
work_keys_str_mv AT breckwoldtjan doesclinicalteachertrainingalwaysimproveteachingeffectivenessasopposedtonoteachertrainingarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT svenssonjorg doesclinicalteachertrainingalwaysimproveteachingeffectivenessasopposedtonoteachertrainingarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lingemannchristian doesclinicalteachertrainingalwaysimproveteachingeffectivenessasopposedtonoteachertrainingarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT gruberhans doesclinicalteachertrainingalwaysimproveteachingeffectivenessasopposedtonoteachertrainingarandomizedcontrolledstudy