Cargando…

Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant

BACKGROUND: Microbiological standards within pork slaughter processing plants in the European Union are currently governed by Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005, which describes detailed performance criteria at specific stages of the procedure (following carcass dressing and before chilling) for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheatley, Paul, Giotis, Efstathios S, McKevitt, Aideen I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24438494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-67-1
_version_ 1782300944257515520
author Wheatley, Paul
Giotis, Efstathios S
McKevitt, Aideen I
author_facet Wheatley, Paul
Giotis, Efstathios S
McKevitt, Aideen I
author_sort Wheatley, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microbiological standards within pork slaughter processing plants in the European Union are currently governed by Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005, which describes detailed performance criteria at specific stages of the procedure (following carcass dressing and before chilling) for total viable counts (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and Salmonella spp. In this study, 95 carcasses from an Irish pork slaughter plant were sampled by swabbing 100 cm(2) of surface at three sites (belly, ham, jowl) to examine the effects of eight processing stages (stunning, bleeding, scalding, singeing, polishing, evisceration, final inspection and chilling) on contamination levels. RESULTS: TVC ranged from approximately 1.7–6.3 log cfu cm(2) during sampling. There were significant reductions in TVC for all sites after scalding and singeing (p < 0.05), whilst there was a significant increase in counts after polishing and evisceration (p < 0.05) compared with preceding stages. EB counts indicated hygienic weak points in the examined slaughter plant leading to faecal (cross)-contamination, with elevated counts after stunning, bleeding and evisceration (p < 0.05), compared with final counts after chilling. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bacterial numbers reported in this study may reflect specific plant practices and temporal influences, results show that contamination can be introduced at various steps in the process and highlight the importance of monitoring locations other than those required by legislation within the process. Monitoring can be used to establish baseline levels for high-risk stages specific to each plant and to assess the effectiveness of additional interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3902064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39020642014-01-26 Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant Wheatley, Paul Giotis, Efstathios S McKevitt, Aideen I Ir Vet J Research BACKGROUND: Microbiological standards within pork slaughter processing plants in the European Union are currently governed by Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005, which describes detailed performance criteria at specific stages of the procedure (following carcass dressing and before chilling) for total viable counts (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and Salmonella spp. In this study, 95 carcasses from an Irish pork slaughter plant were sampled by swabbing 100 cm(2) of surface at three sites (belly, ham, jowl) to examine the effects of eight processing stages (stunning, bleeding, scalding, singeing, polishing, evisceration, final inspection and chilling) on contamination levels. RESULTS: TVC ranged from approximately 1.7–6.3 log cfu cm(2) during sampling. There were significant reductions in TVC for all sites after scalding and singeing (p < 0.05), whilst there was a significant increase in counts after polishing and evisceration (p < 0.05) compared with preceding stages. EB counts indicated hygienic weak points in the examined slaughter plant leading to faecal (cross)-contamination, with elevated counts after stunning, bleeding and evisceration (p < 0.05), compared with final counts after chilling. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bacterial numbers reported in this study may reflect specific plant practices and temporal influences, results show that contamination can be introduced at various steps in the process and highlight the importance of monitoring locations other than those required by legislation within the process. Monitoring can be used to establish baseline levels for high-risk stages specific to each plant and to assess the effectiveness of additional interventions. BioMed Central 2014-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3902064/ /pubmed/24438494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-67-1 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wheatley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wheatley, Paul
Giotis, Efstathios S
McKevitt, Aideen I
Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant
title Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant
title_full Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant
title_fullStr Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant
title_full_unstemmed Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant
title_short Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant
title_sort effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an irish pork production plant
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24438494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-67-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wheatleypaul effectsofslaughteringoperationsoncarcasscontaminationinanirishporkproductionplant
AT giotisefstathioss effectsofslaughteringoperationsoncarcasscontaminationinanirishporkproductionplant
AT mckevittaideeni effectsofslaughteringoperationsoncarcasscontaminationinanirishporkproductionplant