Cargando…
Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant
BACKGROUND: Microbiological standards within pork slaughter processing plants in the European Union are currently governed by Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005, which describes detailed performance criteria at specific stages of the procedure (following carcass dressing and before chilling) for t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24438494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-67-1 |
_version_ | 1782300944257515520 |
---|---|
author | Wheatley, Paul Giotis, Efstathios S McKevitt, Aideen I |
author_facet | Wheatley, Paul Giotis, Efstathios S McKevitt, Aideen I |
author_sort | Wheatley, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microbiological standards within pork slaughter processing plants in the European Union are currently governed by Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005, which describes detailed performance criteria at specific stages of the procedure (following carcass dressing and before chilling) for total viable counts (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and Salmonella spp. In this study, 95 carcasses from an Irish pork slaughter plant were sampled by swabbing 100 cm(2) of surface at three sites (belly, ham, jowl) to examine the effects of eight processing stages (stunning, bleeding, scalding, singeing, polishing, evisceration, final inspection and chilling) on contamination levels. RESULTS: TVC ranged from approximately 1.7–6.3 log cfu cm(2) during sampling. There were significant reductions in TVC for all sites after scalding and singeing (p < 0.05), whilst there was a significant increase in counts after polishing and evisceration (p < 0.05) compared with preceding stages. EB counts indicated hygienic weak points in the examined slaughter plant leading to faecal (cross)-contamination, with elevated counts after stunning, bleeding and evisceration (p < 0.05), compared with final counts after chilling. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bacterial numbers reported in this study may reflect specific plant practices and temporal influences, results show that contamination can be introduced at various steps in the process and highlight the importance of monitoring locations other than those required by legislation within the process. Monitoring can be used to establish baseline levels for high-risk stages specific to each plant and to assess the effectiveness of additional interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3902064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39020642014-01-26 Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant Wheatley, Paul Giotis, Efstathios S McKevitt, Aideen I Ir Vet J Research BACKGROUND: Microbiological standards within pork slaughter processing plants in the European Union are currently governed by Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005, which describes detailed performance criteria at specific stages of the procedure (following carcass dressing and before chilling) for total viable counts (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and Salmonella spp. In this study, 95 carcasses from an Irish pork slaughter plant were sampled by swabbing 100 cm(2) of surface at three sites (belly, ham, jowl) to examine the effects of eight processing stages (stunning, bleeding, scalding, singeing, polishing, evisceration, final inspection and chilling) on contamination levels. RESULTS: TVC ranged from approximately 1.7–6.3 log cfu cm(2) during sampling. There were significant reductions in TVC for all sites after scalding and singeing (p < 0.05), whilst there was a significant increase in counts after polishing and evisceration (p < 0.05) compared with preceding stages. EB counts indicated hygienic weak points in the examined slaughter plant leading to faecal (cross)-contamination, with elevated counts after stunning, bleeding and evisceration (p < 0.05), compared with final counts after chilling. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bacterial numbers reported in this study may reflect specific plant practices and temporal influences, results show that contamination can be introduced at various steps in the process and highlight the importance of monitoring locations other than those required by legislation within the process. Monitoring can be used to establish baseline levels for high-risk stages specific to each plant and to assess the effectiveness of additional interventions. BioMed Central 2014-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3902064/ /pubmed/24438494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-67-1 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wheatley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Wheatley, Paul Giotis, Efstathios S McKevitt, Aideen I Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant |
title | Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant |
title_full | Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant |
title_fullStr | Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant |
title_short | Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant |
title_sort | effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an irish pork production plant |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24438494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-67-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wheatleypaul effectsofslaughteringoperationsoncarcasscontaminationinanirishporkproductionplant AT giotisefstathioss effectsofslaughteringoperationsoncarcasscontaminationinanirishporkproductionplant AT mckevittaideeni effectsofslaughteringoperationsoncarcasscontaminationinanirishporkproductionplant |