Cargando…
Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
PURPOSE: The variational Bayesian independent component analysis-mixture model (VIM), an unsupervised machine-learning classifier, was used to automatically separate Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data into clusters of healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and to identify axes represe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085941 |
_version_ | 1782301624919654400 |
---|---|
author | Bowd, Christopher Weinreb, Robert N. Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan Lee, Intae Jang, Giljin Yousefi, Siamak Zangwill, Linda M. Medeiros, Felipe A. Girkin, Christopher A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Goldbaum, Michael H. |
author_facet | Bowd, Christopher Weinreb, Robert N. Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan Lee, Intae Jang, Giljin Yousefi, Siamak Zangwill, Linda M. Medeiros, Felipe A. Girkin, Christopher A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Goldbaum, Michael H. |
author_sort | Bowd, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The variational Bayesian independent component analysis-mixture model (VIM), an unsupervised machine-learning classifier, was used to automatically separate Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data into clusters of healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and to identify axes representing statistically independent patterns of defect in the glaucoma clusters. METHODS: FDT measurements were obtained from 1,190 eyes with normal FDT results and 786 eyes with abnormal FDT results from the UCSD-based Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES). For all eyes, VIM input was 52 threshold test points from the 24-2 test pattern, plus age. RESULTS: FDT mean deviation was −1.00 dB (S.D. = 2.80 dB) and −5.57 dB (S.D. = 5.09 dB) in FDT-normal eyes and FDT-abnormal eyes, respectively (p<0.001). VIM identified meaningful clusters of FDT data and positioned a set of statistically independent axes through the mean of each cluster. The optimal VIM model separated the FDT fields into 3 clusters. Cluster N contained primarily normal fields (1109/1190, specificity 93.1%) and clusters G(1) and G(2) combined, contained primarily abnormal fields (651/786, sensitivity 82.8%). For clusters G(1) and G(2) the optimal number of axes were 2 and 5, respectively. Patterns automatically generated along axes within the glaucoma clusters were similar to those known to be indicative of glaucoma. Fields located farther from the normal mean on each glaucoma axis showed increasing field defect severity. CONCLUSIONS: VIM successfully separated FDT fields from healthy and glaucoma eyes without a priori information about class membership, and identified familiar glaucomatous patterns of loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3907565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39075652014-02-04 Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers Bowd, Christopher Weinreb, Robert N. Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan Lee, Intae Jang, Giljin Yousefi, Siamak Zangwill, Linda M. Medeiros, Felipe A. Girkin, Christopher A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Goldbaum, Michael H. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The variational Bayesian independent component analysis-mixture model (VIM), an unsupervised machine-learning classifier, was used to automatically separate Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data into clusters of healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and to identify axes representing statistically independent patterns of defect in the glaucoma clusters. METHODS: FDT measurements were obtained from 1,190 eyes with normal FDT results and 786 eyes with abnormal FDT results from the UCSD-based Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES). For all eyes, VIM input was 52 threshold test points from the 24-2 test pattern, plus age. RESULTS: FDT mean deviation was −1.00 dB (S.D. = 2.80 dB) and −5.57 dB (S.D. = 5.09 dB) in FDT-normal eyes and FDT-abnormal eyes, respectively (p<0.001). VIM identified meaningful clusters of FDT data and positioned a set of statistically independent axes through the mean of each cluster. The optimal VIM model separated the FDT fields into 3 clusters. Cluster N contained primarily normal fields (1109/1190, specificity 93.1%) and clusters G(1) and G(2) combined, contained primarily abnormal fields (651/786, sensitivity 82.8%). For clusters G(1) and G(2) the optimal number of axes were 2 and 5, respectively. Patterns automatically generated along axes within the glaucoma clusters were similar to those known to be indicative of glaucoma. Fields located farther from the normal mean on each glaucoma axis showed increasing field defect severity. CONCLUSIONS: VIM successfully separated FDT fields from healthy and glaucoma eyes without a priori information about class membership, and identified familiar glaucomatous patterns of loss. Public Library of Science 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3907565/ /pubmed/24497932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085941 Text en © 2014 Bowd et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bowd, Christopher Weinreb, Robert N. Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan Lee, Intae Jang, Giljin Yousefi, Siamak Zangwill, Linda M. Medeiros, Felipe A. Girkin, Christopher A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Goldbaum, Michael H. Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers |
title | Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers |
title_full | Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers |
title_fullStr | Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers |
title_full_unstemmed | Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers |
title_short | Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers |
title_sort | glaucomatous patterns in frequency doubling technology (fdt) perimetry data identified by unsupervised machine learning classifiers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085941 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowdchristopher glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT weinrebrobertn glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT balasubramanianmadhusudhanan glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT leeintae glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT janggiljin glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT yousefisiamak glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT zangwilllindam glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT medeirosfelipea glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT girkinchristophera glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT liebmannjeffreym glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers AT goldbaummichaelh glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers |