Cargando…

Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers

PURPOSE: The variational Bayesian independent component analysis-mixture model (VIM), an unsupervised machine-learning classifier, was used to automatically separate Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data into clusters of healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and to identify axes represe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowd, Christopher, Weinreb, Robert N., Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan, Lee, Intae, Jang, Giljin, Yousefi, Siamak, Zangwill, Linda M., Medeiros, Felipe A., Girkin, Christopher A., Liebmann, Jeffrey M., Goldbaum, Michael H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085941
_version_ 1782301624919654400
author Bowd, Christopher
Weinreb, Robert N.
Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan
Lee, Intae
Jang, Giljin
Yousefi, Siamak
Zangwill, Linda M.
Medeiros, Felipe A.
Girkin, Christopher A.
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Goldbaum, Michael H.
author_facet Bowd, Christopher
Weinreb, Robert N.
Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan
Lee, Intae
Jang, Giljin
Yousefi, Siamak
Zangwill, Linda M.
Medeiros, Felipe A.
Girkin, Christopher A.
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Goldbaum, Michael H.
author_sort Bowd, Christopher
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The variational Bayesian independent component analysis-mixture model (VIM), an unsupervised machine-learning classifier, was used to automatically separate Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data into clusters of healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and to identify axes representing statistically independent patterns of defect in the glaucoma clusters. METHODS: FDT measurements were obtained from 1,190 eyes with normal FDT results and 786 eyes with abnormal FDT results from the UCSD-based Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES). For all eyes, VIM input was 52 threshold test points from the 24-2 test pattern, plus age. RESULTS: FDT mean deviation was −1.00 dB (S.D. = 2.80 dB) and −5.57 dB (S.D. = 5.09 dB) in FDT-normal eyes and FDT-abnormal eyes, respectively (p<0.001). VIM identified meaningful clusters of FDT data and positioned a set of statistically independent axes through the mean of each cluster. The optimal VIM model separated the FDT fields into 3 clusters. Cluster N contained primarily normal fields (1109/1190, specificity 93.1%) and clusters G(1) and G(2) combined, contained primarily abnormal fields (651/786, sensitivity 82.8%). For clusters G(1) and G(2) the optimal number of axes were 2 and 5, respectively. Patterns automatically generated along axes within the glaucoma clusters were similar to those known to be indicative of glaucoma. Fields located farther from the normal mean on each glaucoma axis showed increasing field defect severity. CONCLUSIONS: VIM successfully separated FDT fields from healthy and glaucoma eyes without a priori information about class membership, and identified familiar glaucomatous patterns of loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3907565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39075652014-02-04 Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers Bowd, Christopher Weinreb, Robert N. Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan Lee, Intae Jang, Giljin Yousefi, Siamak Zangwill, Linda M. Medeiros, Felipe A. Girkin, Christopher A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Goldbaum, Michael H. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The variational Bayesian independent component analysis-mixture model (VIM), an unsupervised machine-learning classifier, was used to automatically separate Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data into clusters of healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and to identify axes representing statistically independent patterns of defect in the glaucoma clusters. METHODS: FDT measurements were obtained from 1,190 eyes with normal FDT results and 786 eyes with abnormal FDT results from the UCSD-based Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) and African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES). For all eyes, VIM input was 52 threshold test points from the 24-2 test pattern, plus age. RESULTS: FDT mean deviation was −1.00 dB (S.D. = 2.80 dB) and −5.57 dB (S.D. = 5.09 dB) in FDT-normal eyes and FDT-abnormal eyes, respectively (p<0.001). VIM identified meaningful clusters of FDT data and positioned a set of statistically independent axes through the mean of each cluster. The optimal VIM model separated the FDT fields into 3 clusters. Cluster N contained primarily normal fields (1109/1190, specificity 93.1%) and clusters G(1) and G(2) combined, contained primarily abnormal fields (651/786, sensitivity 82.8%). For clusters G(1) and G(2) the optimal number of axes were 2 and 5, respectively. Patterns automatically generated along axes within the glaucoma clusters were similar to those known to be indicative of glaucoma. Fields located farther from the normal mean on each glaucoma axis showed increasing field defect severity. CONCLUSIONS: VIM successfully separated FDT fields from healthy and glaucoma eyes without a priori information about class membership, and identified familiar glaucomatous patterns of loss. Public Library of Science 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3907565/ /pubmed/24497932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085941 Text en © 2014 Bowd et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bowd, Christopher
Weinreb, Robert N.
Balasubramanian, Madhusudhanan
Lee, Intae
Jang, Giljin
Yousefi, Siamak
Zangwill, Linda M.
Medeiros, Felipe A.
Girkin, Christopher A.
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Goldbaum, Michael H.
Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
title Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
title_full Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
title_fullStr Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
title_full_unstemmed Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
title_short Glaucomatous Patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry Data Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning Classifiers
title_sort glaucomatous patterns in frequency doubling technology (fdt) perimetry data identified by unsupervised machine learning classifiers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085941
work_keys_str_mv AT bowdchristopher glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT weinrebrobertn glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT balasubramanianmadhusudhanan glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT leeintae glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT janggiljin glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT yousefisiamak glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT zangwilllindam glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT medeirosfelipea glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT girkinchristophera glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT liebmannjeffreym glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers
AT goldbaummichaelh glaucomatouspatternsinfrequencydoublingtechnologyfdtperimetrydataidentifiedbyunsupervisedmachinelearningclassifiers