Cargando…

A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer

Approximately 15–30% of all breast cancer tumors are estrogen receptor negative (ER−). Compared with ER-positive (ER+) disease they have an earlier age at onset and worse prognosis. Despite the vast number of risk variants identified for numerous cancer types, only seven loci have been unambiguously...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campa, Daniele, Barrdahl, Myrto, Tsilidis, Konstantinos K., Severi, Gianluca, Diver, W. Ryan, Siddiq, Afshan, Chanock, Stephen, Hoover, Robert N., Ziegler, Regina G., Berg, Christine D., Buys, Saundra S., Haiman, Christopher A., Henderson, Brian E., Schumacher, Fredrick R., Le Marchand, Loïc, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Lindström, Sara, Hunter, David J., Hankinson, Susan E., Willett, Walter C., Kraft, Peter, Cox, David G., Khaw, Kay-Tee, Tjønneland, Anne, Dossus, Laure, Trichopoulos, Dimitrios, Panico, Salvatore, van Gils, Carla H., Weiderpass, Elisabete, Barricarte, Aurelio, Sund, Malin, Gaudet, Mia M., Giles, Graham, Southey, Melissa, Baglietto, Laura, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Kaaks, Rudolf, Canzian, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24523857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085955
_version_ 1782303265050853376
author Campa, Daniele
Barrdahl, Myrto
Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
Severi, Gianluca
Diver, W. Ryan
Siddiq, Afshan
Chanock, Stephen
Hoover, Robert N.
Ziegler, Regina G.
Berg, Christine D.
Buys, Saundra S.
Haiman, Christopher A.
Henderson, Brian E.
Schumacher, Fredrick R.
Le Marchand, Loïc
Flesch-Janys, Dieter
Lindström, Sara
Hunter, David J.
Hankinson, Susan E.
Willett, Walter C.
Kraft, Peter
Cox, David G.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Tjønneland, Anne
Dossus, Laure
Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
Panico, Salvatore
van Gils, Carla H.
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Barricarte, Aurelio
Sund, Malin
Gaudet, Mia M.
Giles, Graham
Southey, Melissa
Baglietto, Laura
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Kaaks, Rudolf
Canzian, Federico
author_facet Campa, Daniele
Barrdahl, Myrto
Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
Severi, Gianluca
Diver, W. Ryan
Siddiq, Afshan
Chanock, Stephen
Hoover, Robert N.
Ziegler, Regina G.
Berg, Christine D.
Buys, Saundra S.
Haiman, Christopher A.
Henderson, Brian E.
Schumacher, Fredrick R.
Le Marchand, Loïc
Flesch-Janys, Dieter
Lindström, Sara
Hunter, David J.
Hankinson, Susan E.
Willett, Walter C.
Kraft, Peter
Cox, David G.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Tjønneland, Anne
Dossus, Laure
Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
Panico, Salvatore
van Gils, Carla H.
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Barricarte, Aurelio
Sund, Malin
Gaudet, Mia M.
Giles, Graham
Southey, Melissa
Baglietto, Laura
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Kaaks, Rudolf
Canzian, Federico
author_sort Campa, Daniele
collection PubMed
description Approximately 15–30% of all breast cancer tumors are estrogen receptor negative (ER−). Compared with ER-positive (ER+) disease they have an earlier age at onset and worse prognosis. Despite the vast number of risk variants identified for numerous cancer types, only seven loci have been unambiguously identified for ER-negative breast cancer. With the aim of identifying new susceptibility SNPs for this disease we performed a pleiotropic genome-wide association study (GWAS). We selected 3079 SNPs associated with a human complex trait or disease at genome-wide significance level (P<5×10(−8)) to perform a secondary analysis of an ER-negative GWAS from the National Cancer Institute's Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3), including 1998 cases and 2305 controls from prospective studies. We then tested the top ten associations (i.e. with the lowest P-values) using three additional populations with a total sample size of 3509 ER+ cases, 2543 ER− cases and 7031 healthy controls. None of the 3079 selected variants in the BPC3 ER-GWAS were significant at the adjusted threshold. 186 variants were associated with ER− breast cancer risk at a conventional threshold of P<0.05, with P-values ranging from 0.049 to 2.3×10(−4). None of the variants reached statistical significance in the replication phase. In conclusion, this study did not identify any novel susceptibility loci for ER-breast cancer using a “pleiotropic approach”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3921107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39211072014-02-12 A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer Campa, Daniele Barrdahl, Myrto Tsilidis, Konstantinos K. Severi, Gianluca Diver, W. Ryan Siddiq, Afshan Chanock, Stephen Hoover, Robert N. Ziegler, Regina G. Berg, Christine D. Buys, Saundra S. Haiman, Christopher A. Henderson, Brian E. Schumacher, Fredrick R. Le Marchand, Loïc Flesch-Janys, Dieter Lindström, Sara Hunter, David J. Hankinson, Susan E. Willett, Walter C. Kraft, Peter Cox, David G. Khaw, Kay-Tee Tjønneland, Anne Dossus, Laure Trichopoulos, Dimitrios Panico, Salvatore van Gils, Carla H. Weiderpass, Elisabete Barricarte, Aurelio Sund, Malin Gaudet, Mia M. Giles, Graham Southey, Melissa Baglietto, Laura Chang-Claude, Jenny Kaaks, Rudolf Canzian, Federico PLoS One Research Article Approximately 15–30% of all breast cancer tumors are estrogen receptor negative (ER−). Compared with ER-positive (ER+) disease they have an earlier age at onset and worse prognosis. Despite the vast number of risk variants identified for numerous cancer types, only seven loci have been unambiguously identified for ER-negative breast cancer. With the aim of identifying new susceptibility SNPs for this disease we performed a pleiotropic genome-wide association study (GWAS). We selected 3079 SNPs associated with a human complex trait or disease at genome-wide significance level (P<5×10(−8)) to perform a secondary analysis of an ER-negative GWAS from the National Cancer Institute's Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3), including 1998 cases and 2305 controls from prospective studies. We then tested the top ten associations (i.e. with the lowest P-values) using three additional populations with a total sample size of 3509 ER+ cases, 2543 ER− cases and 7031 healthy controls. None of the 3079 selected variants in the BPC3 ER-GWAS were significant at the adjusted threshold. 186 variants were associated with ER− breast cancer risk at a conventional threshold of P<0.05, with P-values ranging from 0.049 to 2.3×10(−4). None of the variants reached statistical significance in the replication phase. In conclusion, this study did not identify any novel susceptibility loci for ER-breast cancer using a “pleiotropic approach”. Public Library of Science 2014-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3921107/ /pubmed/24523857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085955 Text en © 2014 Campa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Campa, Daniele
Barrdahl, Myrto
Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
Severi, Gianluca
Diver, W. Ryan
Siddiq, Afshan
Chanock, Stephen
Hoover, Robert N.
Ziegler, Regina G.
Berg, Christine D.
Buys, Saundra S.
Haiman, Christopher A.
Henderson, Brian E.
Schumacher, Fredrick R.
Le Marchand, Loïc
Flesch-Janys, Dieter
Lindström, Sara
Hunter, David J.
Hankinson, Susan E.
Willett, Walter C.
Kraft, Peter
Cox, David G.
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Tjønneland, Anne
Dossus, Laure
Trichopoulos, Dimitrios
Panico, Salvatore
van Gils, Carla H.
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Barricarte, Aurelio
Sund, Malin
Gaudet, Mia M.
Giles, Graham
Southey, Melissa
Baglietto, Laura
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Kaaks, Rudolf
Canzian, Federico
A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer
title A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer
title_full A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer
title_fullStr A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer
title_short A Genome-Wide “Pleiotropy Scan” Does Not Identify New Susceptibility Loci for Estrogen Receptor Negative Breast Cancer
title_sort genome-wide “pleiotropy scan” does not identify new susceptibility loci for estrogen receptor negative breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24523857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085955
work_keys_str_mv AT campadaniele agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT barrdahlmyrto agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT tsilidiskonstantinosk agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT severigianluca agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT diverwryan agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT siddiqafshan agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT chanockstephen agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hooverrobertn agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT zieglerreginag agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT bergchristined agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT buyssaundras agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT haimanchristophera agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hendersonbriane agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT schumacherfredrickr agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT lemarchandloic agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT fleschjanysdieter agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT lindstromsara agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hunterdavidj agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hankinsonsusane agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT willettwalterc agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT kraftpeter agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT coxdavidg agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT khawkaytee agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT tjønnelandanne agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT dossuslaure agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT trichopoulosdimitrios agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT panicosalvatore agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT vangilscarlah agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT weiderpasselisabete agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT barricarteaurelio agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT sundmalin agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT gaudetmiam agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT gilesgraham agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT southeymelissa agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT bagliettolaura agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT changclaudejenny agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT kaaksrudolf agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT canzianfederico agenomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT campadaniele genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT barrdahlmyrto genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT tsilidiskonstantinosk genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT severigianluca genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT diverwryan genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT siddiqafshan genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT chanockstephen genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hooverrobertn genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT zieglerreginag genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT bergchristined genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT buyssaundras genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT haimanchristophera genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hendersonbriane genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT schumacherfredrickr genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT lemarchandloic genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT fleschjanysdieter genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT lindstromsara genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hunterdavidj genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT hankinsonsusane genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT willettwalterc genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT kraftpeter genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT coxdavidg genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT khawkaytee genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT tjønnelandanne genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT dossuslaure genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT trichopoulosdimitrios genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT panicosalvatore genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT vangilscarlah genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT weiderpasselisabete genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT barricarteaurelio genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT sundmalin genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT gaudetmiam genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT gilesgraham genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT southeymelissa genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT bagliettolaura genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT changclaudejenny genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT kaaksrudolf genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer
AT canzianfederico genomewidepleiotropyscandoesnotidentifynewsusceptibilitylociforestrogenreceptornegativebreastcancer