Cargando…

Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens

Conventional Sanger sequencing remains time-consuming and laborious. In this study, we developed a rapid improved sequencing protocol of 16S rRNA for pathogens identification by using a new combination of SYBR Green I real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing with FTA® cards. To compare the sequencing qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Linxiang, Cai, Ying, Zhou, Guangbiao, Shi, Xiaojun, Su, Jianhui, Chen, Guanwu, Lin, Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088886
_version_ 1782303834268237824
author Chen, Linxiang
Cai, Ying
Zhou, Guangbiao
Shi, Xiaojun
Su, Jianhui
Chen, Guanwu
Lin, Kun
author_facet Chen, Linxiang
Cai, Ying
Zhou, Guangbiao
Shi, Xiaojun
Su, Jianhui
Chen, Guanwu
Lin, Kun
author_sort Chen, Linxiang
collection PubMed
description Conventional Sanger sequencing remains time-consuming and laborious. In this study, we developed a rapid improved sequencing protocol of 16S rRNA for pathogens identification by using a new combination of SYBR Green I real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing with FTA® cards. To compare the sequencing quality of this method with conventional Sanger sequencing, 12 strains, including three kinds of strains (1 reference strain and 3 clinical strains, which were previously identified by biochemical tests), which have 4 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4 Staphyloccocus aureus and 4 Escherichia coli, were targeted. Additionally, to validate the sequencing results and bacteria identification, expanded specimens with 90 clinical strains, also comprised of the three kinds of strains which included 30 samples respectively, were performed as just described. The results showed that although statistical differences (P<0.05) were found in sequencing quality between the two methods, their identification results were all correct and consistent. The workload, the time consumption and the cost per batch were respectively light versus heavy, 8 h versus 11 h and $420 versus $400. In the 90 clinical strains, all of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphyloccocus aureus strains were correctly identified, but only 26.7% of the Escherichia coli strains were recognized as Escherichia coli, while 33.3% as Shigella sonnei and 40% as Shigella dysenteriae. The protocol described here is a rapid, reliable, stable and convenient method for 16S rRNA sequencing, and can be used for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphyloccocus aureus identification, yet it is not completely suitable for discriminating Escherichia coli and Shigella strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3925228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39252282014-02-18 Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens Chen, Linxiang Cai, Ying Zhou, Guangbiao Shi, Xiaojun Su, Jianhui Chen, Guanwu Lin, Kun PLoS One Research Article Conventional Sanger sequencing remains time-consuming and laborious. In this study, we developed a rapid improved sequencing protocol of 16S rRNA for pathogens identification by using a new combination of SYBR Green I real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing with FTA® cards. To compare the sequencing quality of this method with conventional Sanger sequencing, 12 strains, including three kinds of strains (1 reference strain and 3 clinical strains, which were previously identified by biochemical tests), which have 4 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4 Staphyloccocus aureus and 4 Escherichia coli, were targeted. Additionally, to validate the sequencing results and bacteria identification, expanded specimens with 90 clinical strains, also comprised of the three kinds of strains which included 30 samples respectively, were performed as just described. The results showed that although statistical differences (P<0.05) were found in sequencing quality between the two methods, their identification results were all correct and consistent. The workload, the time consumption and the cost per batch were respectively light versus heavy, 8 h versus 11 h and $420 versus $400. In the 90 clinical strains, all of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphyloccocus aureus strains were correctly identified, but only 26.7% of the Escherichia coli strains were recognized as Escherichia coli, while 33.3% as Shigella sonnei and 40% as Shigella dysenteriae. The protocol described here is a rapid, reliable, stable and convenient method for 16S rRNA sequencing, and can be used for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphyloccocus aureus identification, yet it is not completely suitable for discriminating Escherichia coli and Shigella strains. Public Library of Science 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3925228/ /pubmed/24551186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088886 Text en © 2014 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Linxiang
Cai, Ying
Zhou, Guangbiao
Shi, Xiaojun
Su, Jianhui
Chen, Guanwu
Lin, Kun
Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens
title Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens
title_full Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens
title_fullStr Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens
title_short Rapid Sanger Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Identification of Some Common Pathogens
title_sort rapid sanger sequencing of the 16s rrna gene for identification of some common pathogens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088886
work_keys_str_mv AT chenlinxiang rapidsangersequencingofthe16srrnageneforidentificationofsomecommonpathogens
AT caiying rapidsangersequencingofthe16srrnageneforidentificationofsomecommonpathogens
AT zhouguangbiao rapidsangersequencingofthe16srrnageneforidentificationofsomecommonpathogens
AT shixiaojun rapidsangersequencingofthe16srrnageneforidentificationofsomecommonpathogens
AT sujianhui rapidsangersequencingofthe16srrnageneforidentificationofsomecommonpathogens
AT chenguanwu rapidsangersequencingofthe16srrnageneforidentificationofsomecommonpathogens
AT linkun rapidsangersequencingofthe16srrnageneforidentificationofsomecommonpathogens