Cargando…

Geldanamycin-mediated inhibition of heat shock protein 90 partially activates dendritic cells, but interferes with their full maturation, accompanied by impaired upregulation of RelB

BACKGROUND: The chaperon heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) constitutes an important target for anti-tumor therapy due to its essential role in the stabilization of oncogenes. However, HSP90 is ubiquitously active to orchestrate protein turnover, chemotherapeutics that target HSP90 may affect immune cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trojandt, Stefanie, Reske-Kunz, Angelika B, Bros, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24524692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-33-16
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The chaperon heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) constitutes an important target for anti-tumor therapy due to its essential role in the stabilization of oncogenes. However, HSP90 is ubiquitously active to orchestrate protein turnover, chemotherapeutics that target HSP90 may affect immune cells as a significant side effect. Therefore, we asked for potential effects of pharmacological HSP90 inhibition at a therapeutically relevant concentration on human dendritic cells (DCs) as main inducers of both cellular and humoral immune responses, and on human CD4(+) T cells as directly activated by DCs and essential to confer B cell help. METHODS: Unstimulated human monocyte-derived DCs (MO-DCs) were treated with the prototypical HSP90 inhibitor geldanamycin (GA). Based on dose titration studies performed to assess cytotoxic effects, GA was applied at a rather low concentration, comparable to serum levels of clinically used HSP90 inhibitors. The immuno-phenotype (surface markers, cytokines), migratory capacity, allo T cell stimulatory and polarizing properties (proliferation, cytokine pattern) of GA-treated MO-DCs were assessed. Moreover, effects of GA on resting and differentially stimulated CD4(+) T cells in terms of cytotoxicity and proliferation were analysed. RESULTS: GA induced partial activation of unstimulated MO-DCs. In contrast, when coapplied in the course of MO-DC stimulation, GA prevented the acquisition of a fully mature DC phenotype. Consequently, this MO-DC population exerted lower allo CD4(+) T cell stimulation and cytokine production. Furthermore, GA exerted no cytotoxic effect on resting T cells, but abrogated proliferation of T cells stimulated by MO-DCs at either state of activation or by stimulatory antibodies. CONCLUSION: HSP90 inhibitors at clinically relevant concentrations may modulate adaptive immune responses both on the level of DC activation and T cell proliferation. Surprisingly, unstimulated DCs may be partially activated by that agent. However, due to the potent detrimental effects of HSP90 inhibitors on stimulated CD4(+) T cells, as an outcome a patients T cell responses might be impaired. Therefore, HSP90 inhibitors most probably are not suitable for treatment in combination with immunotherapeutic approaches aimed to induce DC/T cell activation.