Cargando…

Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment

In vivo, antibiotics are often much less efficient than ex vivo and relapses can occur. The reasons for poor in vivo activity are still not completely understood. We have studied the fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin in an animal model for complicated Salmonellosis. High-dose ciprofloxacin tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiser, Patrick, Regoes, Roland R., Dolowschiak, Tamas, Wotzka, Sandra Y., Lengefeld, Jette, Slack, Emma, Grant, Andrew J., Ackermann, Martin, Hardt, Wolf-Dietrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001793
_version_ 1782304207564439552
author Kaiser, Patrick
Regoes, Roland R.
Dolowschiak, Tamas
Wotzka, Sandra Y.
Lengefeld, Jette
Slack, Emma
Grant, Andrew J.
Ackermann, Martin
Hardt, Wolf-Dietrich
author_facet Kaiser, Patrick
Regoes, Roland R.
Dolowschiak, Tamas
Wotzka, Sandra Y.
Lengefeld, Jette
Slack, Emma
Grant, Andrew J.
Ackermann, Martin
Hardt, Wolf-Dietrich
author_sort Kaiser, Patrick
collection PubMed
description In vivo, antibiotics are often much less efficient than ex vivo and relapses can occur. The reasons for poor in vivo activity are still not completely understood. We have studied the fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin in an animal model for complicated Salmonellosis. High-dose ciprofloxacin treatment efficiently reduced pathogen loads in feces and most organs. However, the cecum draining lymph node (cLN), the gut tissue, and the spleen retained surviving bacteria. In cLN, approximately 10%–20% of the bacteria remained viable. These phenotypically tolerant bacteria lodged mostly within CD103(+)CX(3)CR1(−)CD11c(+) dendritic cells, remained genetically susceptible to ciprofloxacin, were sufficient to reinitiate infection after the end of the therapy, and displayed an extremely slow growth rate, as shown by mathematical analysis of infections with mixed inocula and segregative plasmid experiments. The slow growth was sufficient to explain recalcitrance to antibiotics treatment. Therefore, slow-growing antibiotic-tolerant bacteria lodged within dendritic cells can explain poor in vivo antibiotic activity and relapse. Administration of LPS or CpG, known elicitors of innate immune defense, reduced the loads of tolerant bacteria. Thus, manipulating innate immunity may augment the in vivo activity of antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3928039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39280392014-02-20 Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment Kaiser, Patrick Regoes, Roland R. Dolowschiak, Tamas Wotzka, Sandra Y. Lengefeld, Jette Slack, Emma Grant, Andrew J. Ackermann, Martin Hardt, Wolf-Dietrich PLoS Biol Research Article In vivo, antibiotics are often much less efficient than ex vivo and relapses can occur. The reasons for poor in vivo activity are still not completely understood. We have studied the fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin in an animal model for complicated Salmonellosis. High-dose ciprofloxacin treatment efficiently reduced pathogen loads in feces and most organs. However, the cecum draining lymph node (cLN), the gut tissue, and the spleen retained surviving bacteria. In cLN, approximately 10%–20% of the bacteria remained viable. These phenotypically tolerant bacteria lodged mostly within CD103(+)CX(3)CR1(−)CD11c(+) dendritic cells, remained genetically susceptible to ciprofloxacin, were sufficient to reinitiate infection after the end of the therapy, and displayed an extremely slow growth rate, as shown by mathematical analysis of infections with mixed inocula and segregative plasmid experiments. The slow growth was sufficient to explain recalcitrance to antibiotics treatment. Therefore, slow-growing antibiotic-tolerant bacteria lodged within dendritic cells can explain poor in vivo antibiotic activity and relapse. Administration of LPS or CpG, known elicitors of innate immune defense, reduced the loads of tolerant bacteria. Thus, manipulating innate immunity may augment the in vivo activity of antibiotics. Public Library of Science 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3928039/ /pubmed/24558351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001793 Text en © 2014 Kaiser et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaiser, Patrick
Regoes, Roland R.
Dolowschiak, Tamas
Wotzka, Sandra Y.
Lengefeld, Jette
Slack, Emma
Grant, Andrew J.
Ackermann, Martin
Hardt, Wolf-Dietrich
Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment
title Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment
title_full Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment
title_fullStr Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment
title_short Cecum Lymph Node Dendritic Cells Harbor Slow-Growing Bacteria Phenotypically Tolerant to Antibiotic Treatment
title_sort cecum lymph node dendritic cells harbor slow-growing bacteria phenotypically tolerant to antibiotic treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001793
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserpatrick cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT regoesrolandr cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT dolowschiaktamas cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT wotzkasandray cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT lengefeldjette cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT slackemma cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT grantandrewj cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT ackermannmartin cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment
AT hardtwolfdietrich cecumlymphnodedendriticcellsharborslowgrowingbacteriaphenotypicallytoleranttoantibiotictreatment