Cargando…

Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal lipid to measure in monitoring patients, we assessed three factors that influence the choice of monitoring tests: (1) clinical validity; (2) responsiveness to therapy changes and (3) the size of the long-term ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glasziou, Paul P, Irwig, Les, Kirby, Adrienne C, Tonkin, Andrew M, Simes, R John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003512
_version_ 1782304737943617536
author Glasziou, Paul P
Irwig, Les
Kirby, Adrienne C
Tonkin, Andrew M
Simes, R John
author_facet Glasziou, Paul P
Irwig, Les
Kirby, Adrienne C
Tonkin, Andrew M
Simes, R John
author_sort Glasziou, Paul P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal lipid to measure in monitoring patients, we assessed three factors that influence the choice of monitoring tests: (1) clinical validity; (2) responsiveness to therapy changes and (3) the size of the long-term ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of repeated lipid measurement over 5 years. SETTING: Subsidiary analysis of a Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study—a clinical trial in Australia, New Zealand and Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 9014 patients aged 31–75 years with previous acute coronary syndromes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 40 mg daily pravastatin or placebo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We used data on serial lipid measurements—at randomisation, 6 months and 12 months, and then annually to 5 years—of total cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and their ratios; triglycerides; and apolipoproteins A and B and their ratio and their ability to predict coronary events. RESULTS: All the lipid measures were statistically significantly associated with future coronary events, but the associations between each of the three ratio measures (total or LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1) and the time to a coronary event were better than those for any of the single lipid measures. The two cholesterol ratios also ranked highly for the long-term signal-to-noise ratios. However, LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol showed the most responsiveness to treatment change. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid monitoring is increasingly common, but current guidelines vary. No single measure was best on all three criteria. Total cholesterol did not rank highly on any single criterion. However, measurements based on cholesterol subfractions—non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) and the two ratios—appeared superior to total cholesterol or any of the apolipoprotein options. Guidelines should consider using non-HDL cholesterol or a ratio measure for initial treatment decisions and subsequent monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3931993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39319932014-02-24 Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study Glasziou, Paul P Irwig, Les Kirby, Adrienne C Tonkin, Andrew M Simes, R John BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal lipid to measure in monitoring patients, we assessed three factors that influence the choice of monitoring tests: (1) clinical validity; (2) responsiveness to therapy changes and (3) the size of the long-term ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of repeated lipid measurement over 5 years. SETTING: Subsidiary analysis of a Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study—a clinical trial in Australia, New Zealand and Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 9014 patients aged 31–75 years with previous acute coronary syndromes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 40 mg daily pravastatin or placebo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We used data on serial lipid measurements—at randomisation, 6 months and 12 months, and then annually to 5 years—of total cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and their ratios; triglycerides; and apolipoproteins A and B and their ratio and their ability to predict coronary events. RESULTS: All the lipid measures were statistically significantly associated with future coronary events, but the associations between each of the three ratio measures (total or LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1) and the time to a coronary event were better than those for any of the single lipid measures. The two cholesterol ratios also ranked highly for the long-term signal-to-noise ratios. However, LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol showed the most responsiveness to treatment change. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid monitoring is increasingly common, but current guidelines vary. No single measure was best on all three criteria. Total cholesterol did not rank highly on any single criterion. However, measurements based on cholesterol subfractions—non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) and the two ratios—appeared superior to total cholesterol or any of the apolipoprotein options. Guidelines should consider using non-HDL cholesterol or a ratio measure for initial treatment decisions and subsequent monitoring. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3931993/ /pubmed/24561494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003512 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Glasziou, Paul P
Irwig, Les
Kirby, Adrienne C
Tonkin, Andrew M
Simes, R John
Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study
title Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study
title_full Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study
title_fullStr Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study
title_full_unstemmed Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study
title_short Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study
title_sort which lipid measurement should we monitor? an analysis of the lipid study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003512
work_keys_str_mv AT glaszioupaulp whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy
AT irwigles whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy
AT kirbyadriennec whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy
AT tonkinandrewm whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy
AT simesrjohn whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy