Cargando…
Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal lipid to measure in monitoring patients, we assessed three factors that influence the choice of monitoring tests: (1) clinical validity; (2) responsiveness to therapy changes and (3) the size of the long-term ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003512 |
_version_ | 1782304737943617536 |
---|---|
author | Glasziou, Paul P Irwig, Les Kirby, Adrienne C Tonkin, Andrew M Simes, R John |
author_facet | Glasziou, Paul P Irwig, Les Kirby, Adrienne C Tonkin, Andrew M Simes, R John |
author_sort | Glasziou, Paul P |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal lipid to measure in monitoring patients, we assessed three factors that influence the choice of monitoring tests: (1) clinical validity; (2) responsiveness to therapy changes and (3) the size of the long-term ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of repeated lipid measurement over 5 years. SETTING: Subsidiary analysis of a Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study—a clinical trial in Australia, New Zealand and Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 9014 patients aged 31–75 years with previous acute coronary syndromes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 40 mg daily pravastatin or placebo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We used data on serial lipid measurements—at randomisation, 6 months and 12 months, and then annually to 5 years—of total cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and their ratios; triglycerides; and apolipoproteins A and B and their ratio and their ability to predict coronary events. RESULTS: All the lipid measures were statistically significantly associated with future coronary events, but the associations between each of the three ratio measures (total or LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1) and the time to a coronary event were better than those for any of the single lipid measures. The two cholesterol ratios also ranked highly for the long-term signal-to-noise ratios. However, LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol showed the most responsiveness to treatment change. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid monitoring is increasingly common, but current guidelines vary. No single measure was best on all three criteria. Total cholesterol did not rank highly on any single criterion. However, measurements based on cholesterol subfractions—non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) and the two ratios—appeared superior to total cholesterol or any of the apolipoprotein options. Guidelines should consider using non-HDL cholesterol or a ratio measure for initial treatment decisions and subsequent monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3931993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39319932014-02-24 Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study Glasziou, Paul P Irwig, Les Kirby, Adrienne C Tonkin, Andrew M Simes, R John BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal lipid to measure in monitoring patients, we assessed three factors that influence the choice of monitoring tests: (1) clinical validity; (2) responsiveness to therapy changes and (3) the size of the long-term ‘signal-to-noise’ ratio. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of repeated lipid measurement over 5 years. SETTING: Subsidiary analysis of a Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) study—a clinical trial in Australia, New Zealand and Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 9014 patients aged 31–75 years with previous acute coronary syndromes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 40 mg daily pravastatin or placebo. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We used data on serial lipid measurements—at randomisation, 6 months and 12 months, and then annually to 5 years—of total cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and their ratios; triglycerides; and apolipoproteins A and B and their ratio and their ability to predict coronary events. RESULTS: All the lipid measures were statistically significantly associated with future coronary events, but the associations between each of the three ratio measures (total or LDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1) and the time to a coronary event were better than those for any of the single lipid measures. The two cholesterol ratios also ranked highly for the long-term signal-to-noise ratios. However, LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol showed the most responsiveness to treatment change. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid monitoring is increasingly common, but current guidelines vary. No single measure was best on all three criteria. Total cholesterol did not rank highly on any single criterion. However, measurements based on cholesterol subfractions—non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) and the two ratios—appeared superior to total cholesterol or any of the apolipoprotein options. Guidelines should consider using non-HDL cholesterol or a ratio measure for initial treatment decisions and subsequent monitoring. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3931993/ /pubmed/24561494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003512 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Glasziou, Paul P Irwig, Les Kirby, Adrienne C Tonkin, Andrew M Simes, R John Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study |
title | Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study |
title_full | Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study |
title_fullStr | Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study |
title_full_unstemmed | Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study |
title_short | Which lipid measurement should we monitor? An analysis of the LIPID study |
title_sort | which lipid measurement should we monitor? an analysis of the lipid study |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glaszioupaulp whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy AT irwigles whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy AT kirbyadriennec whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy AT tonkinandrewm whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy AT simesrjohn whichlipidmeasurementshouldwemonitorananalysisofthelipidstudy |