Cargando…

Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin

Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced DNA damage is repaired by the base excision repair pathway. However, the effect of chromatin structure on BER protein recruitment to DNA damage sites in living cells is poorly understood. To address this problem, we developed a method to specifically produce ROS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lan, Li, Nakajima, Satoshi, Wei, Leizhen, Sun, Luxi, Hsieh, Ching-Lung, Sobol, Robert W., Bruchez, Marcel, Van Houten, Bennett, Yasui, Akira, Levine, Arthur S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1233
_version_ 1782305349404983296
author Lan, Li
Nakajima, Satoshi
Wei, Leizhen
Sun, Luxi
Hsieh, Ching-Lung
Sobol, Robert W.
Bruchez, Marcel
Van Houten, Bennett
Yasui, Akira
Levine, Arthur S.
author_facet Lan, Li
Nakajima, Satoshi
Wei, Leizhen
Sun, Luxi
Hsieh, Ching-Lung
Sobol, Robert W.
Bruchez, Marcel
Van Houten, Bennett
Yasui, Akira
Levine, Arthur S.
author_sort Lan, Li
collection PubMed
description Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced DNA damage is repaired by the base excision repair pathway. However, the effect of chromatin structure on BER protein recruitment to DNA damage sites in living cells is poorly understood. To address this problem, we developed a method to specifically produce ROS-induced DNA damage by fusing KillerRed (KR), a light-stimulated ROS-inducer, to a tet-repressor (tetR-KR) or a transcription activator (TA-KR). TetR-KR or TA-KR, bound to a TRE cassette (∼90 kb) integrated at a defined genomic locus in U2OS cells, was used to induce ROS damage in hetero- or euchromatin, respectively. We found that DNA glycosylases were efficiently recruited to DNA damage in heterochromatin, as well as in euchromatin. PARP1 was recruited to DNA damage within condensed chromatin more efficiently than in active chromatin. In contrast, recruitment of FEN1 was highly enriched at sites of DNA damage within active chromatin in a PCNA- and transcription activation-dependent manner. These results indicate that oxidative DNA damage is differentially processed within hetero or euchromatin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3936713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39367132014-03-04 Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin Lan, Li Nakajima, Satoshi Wei, Leizhen Sun, Luxi Hsieh, Ching-Lung Sobol, Robert W. Bruchez, Marcel Van Houten, Bennett Yasui, Akira Levine, Arthur S. Nucleic Acids Res Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced DNA damage is repaired by the base excision repair pathway. However, the effect of chromatin structure on BER protein recruitment to DNA damage sites in living cells is poorly understood. To address this problem, we developed a method to specifically produce ROS-induced DNA damage by fusing KillerRed (KR), a light-stimulated ROS-inducer, to a tet-repressor (tetR-KR) or a transcription activator (TA-KR). TetR-KR or TA-KR, bound to a TRE cassette (∼90 kb) integrated at a defined genomic locus in U2OS cells, was used to induce ROS damage in hetero- or euchromatin, respectively. We found that DNA glycosylases were efficiently recruited to DNA damage in heterochromatin, as well as in euchromatin. PARP1 was recruited to DNA damage within condensed chromatin more efficiently than in active chromatin. In contrast, recruitment of FEN1 was highly enriched at sites of DNA damage within active chromatin in a PCNA- and transcription activation-dependent manner. These results indicate that oxidative DNA damage is differentially processed within hetero or euchromatin. Oxford University Press 2014-02 2013-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3936713/ /pubmed/24293652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1233 Text en © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
Lan, Li
Nakajima, Satoshi
Wei, Leizhen
Sun, Luxi
Hsieh, Ching-Lung
Sobol, Robert W.
Bruchez, Marcel
Van Houten, Bennett
Yasui, Akira
Levine, Arthur S.
Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin
title Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin
title_full Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin
title_fullStr Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin
title_full_unstemmed Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin
title_short Novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative DNA damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin
title_sort novel method for site-specific induction of oxidative dna damage reveals differences in recruitment of repair proteins to heterochromatin and euchromatin
topic Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3936713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1233
work_keys_str_mv AT lanli novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT nakajimasatoshi novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT weileizhen novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT sunluxi novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT hsiehchinglung novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT sobolrobertw novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT bruchezmarcel novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT vanhoutenbennett novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT yasuiakira novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin
AT levinearthurs novelmethodforsitespecificinductionofoxidativednadamagerevealsdifferencesinrecruitmentofrepairproteinstoheterochromatinandeuchromatin