Cargando…
A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
Pork is the most widely eaten meat in the world and recent evidence shows that diets high in pork protein, with and without energy restriction, may have favourable effects on body composition. However, it is unclear whether these effects on body composition are specific to pork or whether consumptio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6020682 |
_version_ | 1782479114160046080 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Karen J. Parker, Barbara Dyer, Kathryn A. Davis, Courtney R. Coates, Alison M. Buckley, Jonathan D. Howe, Peter R. C. |
author_facet | Murphy, Karen J. Parker, Barbara Dyer, Kathryn A. Davis, Courtney R. Coates, Alison M. Buckley, Jonathan D. Howe, Peter R. C. |
author_sort | Murphy, Karen J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pork is the most widely eaten meat in the world and recent evidence shows that diets high in pork protein, with and without energy restriction, may have favourable effects on body composition. However, it is unclear whether these effects on body composition are specific to pork or whether consumption of other high protein meat diets may have the same benefit. Therefore we aimed to compare regular consumption of pork, beef and chicken on indices of adiposity. In a nine month randomised open-labelled cross-over intervention trial, 49 overweight or obese adults were randomly assigned to consume up to 1 kg/week of pork, chicken or beef, in an otherwise unrestricted diet for three months, followed by two further three month periods consuming each of the alternative meat options. BMI and waist/hip circumference were measured and body composition was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Dietary intake was assessed using three day weighed food diaries. Energy expenditure was estimated from activity diaries. There was no difference in BMI or any other marker of adiposity between consumption of pork, beef and chicken diets. Similarly there were no differences in energy or nutrient intakes between diets. After three months, regular consumption of lean pork meat as compared to that of beef and chicken results in similar changes in markers of adiposity of overweight and obese Australian middle-aged men and women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3942727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39427272014-03-05 A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial Murphy, Karen J. Parker, Barbara Dyer, Kathryn A. Davis, Courtney R. Coates, Alison M. Buckley, Jonathan D. Howe, Peter R. C. Nutrients Pork is the most widely eaten meat in the world and recent evidence shows that diets high in pork protein, with and without energy restriction, may have favourable effects on body composition. However, it is unclear whether these effects on body composition are specific to pork or whether consumption of other high protein meat diets may have the same benefit. Therefore we aimed to compare regular consumption of pork, beef and chicken on indices of adiposity. In a nine month randomised open-labelled cross-over intervention trial, 49 overweight or obese adults were randomly assigned to consume up to 1 kg/week of pork, chicken or beef, in an otherwise unrestricted diet for three months, followed by two further three month periods consuming each of the alternative meat options. BMI and waist/hip circumference were measured and body composition was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Dietary intake was assessed using three day weighed food diaries. Energy expenditure was estimated from activity diaries. There was no difference in BMI or any other marker of adiposity between consumption of pork, beef and chicken diets. Similarly there were no differences in energy or nutrient intakes between diets. After three months, regular consumption of lean pork meat as compared to that of beef and chicken results in similar changes in markers of adiposity of overweight and obese Australian middle-aged men and women. MDPI 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3942727/ /pubmed/24534884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6020682 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Murphy, Karen J. Parker, Barbara Dyer, Kathryn A. Davis, Courtney R. Coates, Alison M. Buckley, Jonathan D. Howe, Peter R. C. A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial |
title | A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial |
title_full | A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial |
title_short | A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial |
title_sort | comparison of regular consumption of fresh lean pork, beef and chicken on body composition: a randomized cross-over trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6020682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphykarenj acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT parkerbarbara acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT dyerkathryna acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT daviscourtneyr acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT coatesalisonm acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT buckleyjonathand acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT howepeterrc acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT murphykarenj comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT parkerbarbara comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT dyerkathryna comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT daviscourtneyr comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT coatesalisonm comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT buckleyjonathand comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial AT howepeterrc comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial |