Cargando…

A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial

Pork is the most widely eaten meat in the world and recent evidence shows that diets high in pork protein, with and without energy restriction, may have favourable effects on body composition. However, it is unclear whether these effects on body composition are specific to pork or whether consumptio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Karen J., Parker, Barbara, Dyer, Kathryn A., Davis, Courtney R., Coates, Alison M., Buckley, Jonathan D., Howe, Peter R. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6020682
_version_ 1782479114160046080
author Murphy, Karen J.
Parker, Barbara
Dyer, Kathryn A.
Davis, Courtney R.
Coates, Alison M.
Buckley, Jonathan D.
Howe, Peter R. C.
author_facet Murphy, Karen J.
Parker, Barbara
Dyer, Kathryn A.
Davis, Courtney R.
Coates, Alison M.
Buckley, Jonathan D.
Howe, Peter R. C.
author_sort Murphy, Karen J.
collection PubMed
description Pork is the most widely eaten meat in the world and recent evidence shows that diets high in pork protein, with and without energy restriction, may have favourable effects on body composition. However, it is unclear whether these effects on body composition are specific to pork or whether consumption of other high protein meat diets may have the same benefit. Therefore we aimed to compare regular consumption of pork, beef and chicken on indices of adiposity. In a nine month randomised open-labelled cross-over intervention trial, 49 overweight or obese adults were randomly assigned to consume up to 1 kg/week of pork, chicken or beef, in an otherwise unrestricted diet for three months, followed by two further three month periods consuming each of the alternative meat options. BMI and waist/hip circumference were measured and body composition was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Dietary intake was assessed using three day weighed food diaries. Energy expenditure was estimated from activity diaries. There was no difference in BMI or any other marker of adiposity between consumption of pork, beef and chicken diets. Similarly there were no differences in energy or nutrient intakes between diets. After three months, regular consumption of lean pork meat as compared to that of beef and chicken results in similar changes in markers of adiposity of overweight and obese Australian middle-aged men and women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3942727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39427272014-03-05 A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial Murphy, Karen J. Parker, Barbara Dyer, Kathryn A. Davis, Courtney R. Coates, Alison M. Buckley, Jonathan D. Howe, Peter R. C. Nutrients Pork is the most widely eaten meat in the world and recent evidence shows that diets high in pork protein, with and without energy restriction, may have favourable effects on body composition. However, it is unclear whether these effects on body composition are specific to pork or whether consumption of other high protein meat diets may have the same benefit. Therefore we aimed to compare regular consumption of pork, beef and chicken on indices of adiposity. In a nine month randomised open-labelled cross-over intervention trial, 49 overweight or obese adults were randomly assigned to consume up to 1 kg/week of pork, chicken or beef, in an otherwise unrestricted diet for three months, followed by two further three month periods consuming each of the alternative meat options. BMI and waist/hip circumference were measured and body composition was determined using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Dietary intake was assessed using three day weighed food diaries. Energy expenditure was estimated from activity diaries. There was no difference in BMI or any other marker of adiposity between consumption of pork, beef and chicken diets. Similarly there were no differences in energy or nutrient intakes between diets. After three months, regular consumption of lean pork meat as compared to that of beef and chicken results in similar changes in markers of adiposity of overweight and obese Australian middle-aged men and women. MDPI 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3942727/ /pubmed/24534884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6020682 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Murphy, Karen J.
Parker, Barbara
Dyer, Kathryn A.
Davis, Courtney R.
Coates, Alison M.
Buckley, Jonathan D.
Howe, Peter R. C.
A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
title A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
title_full A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
title_fullStr A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
title_short A Comparison of Regular Consumption of Fresh Lean Pork, Beef and Chicken on Body Composition: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial
title_sort comparison of regular consumption of fresh lean pork, beef and chicken on body composition: a randomized cross-over trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3942727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6020682
work_keys_str_mv AT murphykarenj acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT parkerbarbara acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT dyerkathryna acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT daviscourtneyr acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT coatesalisonm acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT buckleyjonathand acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT howepeterrc acomparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT murphykarenj comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT parkerbarbara comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT dyerkathryna comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT daviscourtneyr comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT coatesalisonm comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT buckleyjonathand comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT howepeterrc comparisonofregularconsumptionoffreshleanporkbeefandchickenonbodycompositionarandomizedcrossovertrial