Cargando…

Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess for a predominance of learning styles among pharmacy students at an accredited U.S. school of pharmacy. METHODS: Following approval by the Institutional Review Board, the Index of Learning Styles© was administered to 210 pharmacy students. The survey p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teevan, Colleen J., Li, Michael, Schlesselman, Lauren S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688613
_version_ 1782309313622048768
author Teevan, Colleen J.
Li, Michael
Schlesselman, Lauren S.
author_facet Teevan, Colleen J.
Li, Michael
Schlesselman, Lauren S.
author_sort Teevan, Colleen J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess for a predominance of learning styles among pharmacy students at an accredited U.S. school of pharmacy. METHODS: Following approval by the Institutional Review Board, the Index of Learning Styles© was administered to 210 pharmacy students. The survey provides results within 4 domains: perception, input, processing, and understanding. Analyses were conducted to determine trends in student learning styles. RESULTS: Within the four domains, 84% of students showed a preference toward sensory perception, 66% toward visual input, and 74% toward sequential understanding. Students showed no significant preference for active or reflective processing. Preferences were of moderate strength for the sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles. CONCLUSIONS: Students showed preferences for sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles with gender playing a role in learning style preferences. Faculty should be aware, despite some preferences, a mix of learning styles exists. To focus on the preferences found, instructors should focus teaching in a logical progression while adding visual aids. To account for other types of learning styles found, the instructors can offer other approaches and provide supplemental activities for those who would benefit from them. Further research is necessary to compare these learning styles to the teaching styles of pharmacy preceptors and faculty at schools of pharmacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3969830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39698302014-03-31 Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy Teevan, Colleen J. Li, Michael Schlesselman, Lauren S. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess for a predominance of learning styles among pharmacy students at an accredited U.S. school of pharmacy. METHODS: Following approval by the Institutional Review Board, the Index of Learning Styles© was administered to 210 pharmacy students. The survey provides results within 4 domains: perception, input, processing, and understanding. Analyses were conducted to determine trends in student learning styles. RESULTS: Within the four domains, 84% of students showed a preference toward sensory perception, 66% toward visual input, and 74% toward sequential understanding. Students showed no significant preference for active or reflective processing. Preferences were of moderate strength for the sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles. CONCLUSIONS: Students showed preferences for sensing, visual, and sequential learning styles with gender playing a role in learning style preferences. Faculty should be aware, despite some preferences, a mix of learning styles exists. To focus on the preferences found, instructors should focus teaching in a logical progression while adding visual aids. To account for other types of learning styles found, the instructors can offer other approaches and provide supplemental activities for those who would benefit from them. Further research is necessary to compare these learning styles to the teaching styles of pharmacy preceptors and faculty at schools of pharmacy. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2011 2011-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3969830/ /pubmed/24688613 Text en Copyright © 2011, CIPF http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Teevan, Colleen J.
Li, Michael
Schlesselman, Lauren S.
Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy
title Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy
title_full Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy
title_fullStr Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy
title_full_unstemmed Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy
title_short Index of Learning Styles in a U.S. School of Pharmacy
title_sort index of learning styles in a u.s. school of pharmacy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688613
work_keys_str_mv AT teevancolleenj indexoflearningstylesinausschoolofpharmacy
AT limichael indexoflearningstylesinausschoolofpharmacy
AT schlesselmanlaurens indexoflearningstylesinausschoolofpharmacy