Cargando…

Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262

In the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) of human cells, disulfide bonds are predominantly generated by the two isoforms of Ero1 (ER oxidoreductin-1): Ero1α and Ero1β. The activity of Ero1α is tightly regulated through the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds to help ensure balanced ER redox conditi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Henning G., Søltoft, Cecilie L., Schmidt, Jonas D., Birk, Julia, Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian, Ellgaard, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20130124
_version_ 1782309477689589760
author Hansen, Henning G.
Søltoft, Cecilie L.
Schmidt, Jonas D.
Birk, Julia
Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
Ellgaard, Lars
author_facet Hansen, Henning G.
Søltoft, Cecilie L.
Schmidt, Jonas D.
Birk, Julia
Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
Ellgaard, Lars
author_sort Hansen, Henning G.
collection PubMed
description In the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) of human cells, disulfide bonds are predominantly generated by the two isoforms of Ero1 (ER oxidoreductin-1): Ero1α and Ero1β. The activity of Ero1α is tightly regulated through the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds to help ensure balanced ER redox conditions. Ero1β is less tightly regulated, but the molecular details underlying control of activity are not as well characterized as for Ero1α. Ero1β contains an additional cysteine residue (Cys(262)), which has been suggested to engage in an isoform-specific regulatory disulfide bond with Cys(100). However, we show that the two regulatory disulfide bonds in Ero1α are likely conserved in Ero1β (Cys(90)–Cys(130) and Cys(95)–Cys(100)). Molecular modelling of the Ero1β structure predicted that the side chain of Cys(262) is completely buried. Indeed, we found this cysteine to be reduced and partially protected from alkylation in the ER of living cells. Furthermore, mutation of Cys(100)–but not of Cys(262)–rendered Ero1β hyperactive in cells, as did mutation of Cys(130). Ero1β hyperactivity induced the UPR (unfolded protein response) and resulted in oxidative perturbation of the ER redox state. We propose that features other than a distinct pattern of regulatory disulfide bonds determine the loose redox regulation of Ero1β relative to Ero1α.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3971451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Portland Press Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39714512014-04-16 Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262 Hansen, Henning G. Søltoft, Cecilie L. Schmidt, Jonas D. Birk, Julia Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian Ellgaard, Lars Biosci Rep Original Paper In the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) of human cells, disulfide bonds are predominantly generated by the two isoforms of Ero1 (ER oxidoreductin-1): Ero1α and Ero1β. The activity of Ero1α is tightly regulated through the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds to help ensure balanced ER redox conditions. Ero1β is less tightly regulated, but the molecular details underlying control of activity are not as well characterized as for Ero1α. Ero1β contains an additional cysteine residue (Cys(262)), which has been suggested to engage in an isoform-specific regulatory disulfide bond with Cys(100). However, we show that the two regulatory disulfide bonds in Ero1α are likely conserved in Ero1β (Cys(90)–Cys(130) and Cys(95)–Cys(100)). Molecular modelling of the Ero1β structure predicted that the side chain of Cys(262) is completely buried. Indeed, we found this cysteine to be reduced and partially protected from alkylation in the ER of living cells. Furthermore, mutation of Cys(100)–but not of Cys(262)–rendered Ero1β hyperactive in cells, as did mutation of Cys(130). Ero1β hyperactivity induced the UPR (unfolded protein response) and resulted in oxidative perturbation of the ER redox state. We propose that features other than a distinct pattern of regulatory disulfide bonds determine the loose redox regulation of Ero1β relative to Ero1α. Portland Press Ltd. 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3971451/ /pubmed/27919037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20130124 Text en © 2014 The author(s) has paid for this article to be freely available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hansen, Henning G.
Søltoft, Cecilie L.
Schmidt, Jonas D.
Birk, Julia
Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
Ellgaard, Lars
Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262
title Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262
title_full Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262
title_fullStr Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262
title_full_unstemmed Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262
title_short Biochemical evidence that regulation of Ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262
title_sort biochemical evidence that regulation of ero1β activity in human cells does not involve the isoform-specific cysteine 262
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20130124
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenhenningg biochemicalevidencethatregulationofero1bactivityinhumancellsdoesnotinvolvetheisoformspecificcysteine262
AT søltoftceciliel biochemicalevidencethatregulationofero1bactivityinhumancellsdoesnotinvolvetheisoformspecificcysteine262
AT schmidtjonasd biochemicalevidencethatregulationofero1bactivityinhumancellsdoesnotinvolvetheisoformspecificcysteine262
AT birkjulia biochemicalevidencethatregulationofero1bactivityinhumancellsdoesnotinvolvetheisoformspecificcysteine262
AT appenzellerherzogchristian biochemicalevidencethatregulationofero1bactivityinhumancellsdoesnotinvolvetheisoformspecificcysteine262
AT ellgaardlars biochemicalevidencethatregulationofero1bactivityinhumancellsdoesnotinvolvetheisoformspecificcysteine262