Cargando…

DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures

Whole genome sequencing of cancer genomes has revealed a diversity of recurrent gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) that are likely signatures of specific defects in DNA damage response pathways. However, inferring the underlying defects has been difficult due to insufficient information relatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putnam, Christopher D., Pallis, Katielee, Hayes, Tikvah K., Kolodner, Richard D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24699249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004277
_version_ 1782479492284940288
author Putnam, Christopher D.
Pallis, Katielee
Hayes, Tikvah K.
Kolodner, Richard D.
author_facet Putnam, Christopher D.
Pallis, Katielee
Hayes, Tikvah K.
Kolodner, Richard D.
author_sort Putnam, Christopher D.
collection PubMed
description Whole genome sequencing of cancer genomes has revealed a diversity of recurrent gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) that are likely signatures of specific defects in DNA damage response pathways. However, inferring the underlying defects has been difficult due to insufficient information relating defects in DNA metabolism to GCR signatures. By analyzing over 95 mutant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we found that the frequency of GCRs that deleted an internal CAN1/URA3 cassette on chrV L while retaining a chrV L telomeric hph marker was significantly higher in tel1Δ, sae2Δ, rad53Δ sml1Δ, and mrc1Δ tof1Δ mutants. The hph-retaining GCRs isolated from tel1Δ mutants contained either an interstitial deletion dependent on non-homologous end-joining or an inverted duplication that appeared to be initiated from a double strand break (DSB) on chrV L followed by hairpin formation, copying of chrV L from the DSB toward the centromere, and homologous recombination to capture the hph-containing end of chrV L. In contrast, hph-containing GCRs from other mutants were primarily interstitial deletions (mrc1Δ tof1Δ) or inverted duplications (sae2Δ and rad53Δ sml1Δ). Mutants with impaired de novo telomere addition had increased frequencies of hph-containing GCRs, whereas mutants with increased de novo telomere addition had decreased frequencies of hph-containing GCRs. Both types of hph-retaining GCRs occurred in wild-type strains, suggesting that the increased frequencies of hph retention were due to the relative efficiencies of competing DNA repair pathways. Interestingly, the inverted duplications observed here resemble common GCRs in metastatic pancreatic cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3974649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39746492014-04-08 DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures Putnam, Christopher D. Pallis, Katielee Hayes, Tikvah K. Kolodner, Richard D. PLoS Genet Research Article Whole genome sequencing of cancer genomes has revealed a diversity of recurrent gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) that are likely signatures of specific defects in DNA damage response pathways. However, inferring the underlying defects has been difficult due to insufficient information relating defects in DNA metabolism to GCR signatures. By analyzing over 95 mutant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we found that the frequency of GCRs that deleted an internal CAN1/URA3 cassette on chrV L while retaining a chrV L telomeric hph marker was significantly higher in tel1Δ, sae2Δ, rad53Δ sml1Δ, and mrc1Δ tof1Δ mutants. The hph-retaining GCRs isolated from tel1Δ mutants contained either an interstitial deletion dependent on non-homologous end-joining or an inverted duplication that appeared to be initiated from a double strand break (DSB) on chrV L followed by hairpin formation, copying of chrV L from the DSB toward the centromere, and homologous recombination to capture the hph-containing end of chrV L. In contrast, hph-containing GCRs from other mutants were primarily interstitial deletions (mrc1Δ tof1Δ) or inverted duplications (sae2Δ and rad53Δ sml1Δ). Mutants with impaired de novo telomere addition had increased frequencies of hph-containing GCRs, whereas mutants with increased de novo telomere addition had decreased frequencies of hph-containing GCRs. Both types of hph-retaining GCRs occurred in wild-type strains, suggesting that the increased frequencies of hph retention were due to the relative efficiencies of competing DNA repair pathways. Interestingly, the inverted duplications observed here resemble common GCRs in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Public Library of Science 2014-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3974649/ /pubmed/24699249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004277 Text en © 2014 Putnam et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Putnam, Christopher D.
Pallis, Katielee
Hayes, Tikvah K.
Kolodner, Richard D.
DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures
title DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures
title_full DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures
title_fullStr DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures
title_full_unstemmed DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures
title_short DNA Repair Pathway Selection Caused by Defects in TEL1, SAE2, and De Novo Telomere Addition Generates Specific Chromosomal Rearrangement Signatures
title_sort dna repair pathway selection caused by defects in tel1, sae2, and de novo telomere addition generates specific chromosomal rearrangement signatures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24699249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004277
work_keys_str_mv AT putnamchristopherd dnarepairpathwayselectioncausedbydefectsintel1sae2anddenovotelomereadditiongeneratesspecificchromosomalrearrangementsignatures
AT palliskatielee dnarepairpathwayselectioncausedbydefectsintel1sae2anddenovotelomereadditiongeneratesspecificchromosomalrearrangementsignatures
AT hayestikvahk dnarepairpathwayselectioncausedbydefectsintel1sae2anddenovotelomereadditiongeneratesspecificchromosomalrearrangementsignatures
AT kolodnerrichardd dnarepairpathwayselectioncausedbydefectsintel1sae2anddenovotelomereadditiongeneratesspecificchromosomalrearrangementsignatures