Cargando…

Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality

This study was performed to understand the degree to which medical students’ self-efficacy (SE) moderates the influence of calling on students’ speciality commitment, emphasizing the need to understand variables that predict primary care specialization. The researchers hypothesized that students who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodin, Joel B., Duffy, Ryan D., Borges, Nicole J., Ulman, Catherine A., D’Brot, Vanessa M., Manuel, R. Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24531931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0110-7
_version_ 1782310300635103232
author Goodin, Joel B.
Duffy, Ryan D.
Borges, Nicole J.
Ulman, Catherine A.
D’Brot, Vanessa M.
Manuel, R. Stephen
author_facet Goodin, Joel B.
Duffy, Ryan D.
Borges, Nicole J.
Ulman, Catherine A.
D’Brot, Vanessa M.
Manuel, R. Stephen
author_sort Goodin, Joel B.
collection PubMed
description This study was performed to understand the degree to which medical students’ self-efficacy (SE) moderates the influence of calling on students’ speciality commitment, emphasizing the need to understand variables that predict primary care specialization. The researchers hypothesized that students who perceived their career as a calling would be more committed to their speciality, especially when students had high SE. Medical students (Years 1–4; N = 152) completed an online survey to rate their calling, speciality commitment, and SE. Calling was measured by the Brief Calling scale (Dik et al., J Career Assess 20:242–263, 2012), while speciality choice was measured by Hollenbeck et al. (J Appl Psychol 74:18–23, 1989) measure of commitment. SE was measured by the Jerusalem and Schwarzer's general SE scale (see Scholz et al., Eur J Psychol Assess 18:242–51, 2002). Calling (r = 0.24, p < 0.01) and SE (r = 0.20, p < 0.05) were found to moderately correlate with speciality commitment, thus emphasizing the possibility that they may have an interaction. The interaction of calling and SE significantly predicted speciality commitment (β = −0.20, t(148) = −2.55, p < 0.05) and explained a significant proportion of variance in speciality commitment (R (2) = 0.12, F(3, 148) = 6.875, p < 0.001). Students with a high presence of calling may have high speciality commitment, despite low SE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3976485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39764852014-04-07 Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality Goodin, Joel B. Duffy, Ryan D. Borges, Nicole J. Ulman, Catherine A. D’Brot, Vanessa M. Manuel, R. Stephen Perspect Med Educ Original Article This study was performed to understand the degree to which medical students’ self-efficacy (SE) moderates the influence of calling on students’ speciality commitment, emphasizing the need to understand variables that predict primary care specialization. The researchers hypothesized that students who perceived their career as a calling would be more committed to their speciality, especially when students had high SE. Medical students (Years 1–4; N = 152) completed an online survey to rate their calling, speciality commitment, and SE. Calling was measured by the Brief Calling scale (Dik et al., J Career Assess 20:242–263, 2012), while speciality choice was measured by Hollenbeck et al. (J Appl Psychol 74:18–23, 1989) measure of commitment. SE was measured by the Jerusalem and Schwarzer's general SE scale (see Scholz et al., Eur J Psychol Assess 18:242–51, 2002). Calling (r = 0.24, p < 0.01) and SE (r = 0.20, p < 0.05) were found to moderately correlate with speciality commitment, thus emphasizing the possibility that they may have an interaction. The interaction of calling and SE significantly predicted speciality commitment (β = −0.20, t(148) = −2.55, p < 0.05) and explained a significant proportion of variance in speciality commitment (R (2) = 0.12, F(3, 148) = 6.875, p < 0.001). Students with a high presence of calling may have high speciality commitment, despite low SE. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2014-02-15 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3976485/ /pubmed/24531931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0110-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goodin, Joel B.
Duffy, Ryan D.
Borges, Nicole J.
Ulman, Catherine A.
D’Brot, Vanessa M.
Manuel, R. Stephen
Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality
title Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality
title_full Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality
title_fullStr Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality
title_full_unstemmed Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality
title_short Medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality
title_sort medical students with low self-efficacy bolstered by calling to medical speciality
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3976485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24531931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0110-7
work_keys_str_mv AT goodinjoelb medicalstudentswithlowselfefficacybolsteredbycallingtomedicalspeciality
AT duffyryand medicalstudentswithlowselfefficacybolsteredbycallingtomedicalspeciality
AT borgesnicolej medicalstudentswithlowselfefficacybolsteredbycallingtomedicalspeciality
AT ulmancatherinea medicalstudentswithlowselfefficacybolsteredbycallingtomedicalspeciality
AT dbrotvanessam medicalstudentswithlowselfefficacybolsteredbycallingtomedicalspeciality
AT manuelrstephen medicalstudentswithlowselfefficacybolsteredbycallingtomedicalspeciality