Cargando…

Cardiac contractility modulation increases action potential duration dispersion and decreases ventricular fibrillation threshold via β1-adrenoceptor activation in the crystalloid perfused normal rabbit heart()()

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a new treatment being developed for heart failure (HF) involving application of electrical current during the absolute refractory period. We have previously shown that CCM increases ventricular force through β1-adrenoceptor activation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, James, Brack, Kieran E., Coote, John H., Ng, G. André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24456882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.184
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a new treatment being developed for heart failure (HF) involving application of electrical current during the absolute refractory period. We have previously shown that CCM increases ventricular force through β1-adrenoceptor activation in the whole heart, a potential pro-arrhythmic mechanism. This study aimed to investigate the effect of CCM on ventricular fibrillation susceptibility. METHODS: Experiments were conducted in isolated New Zealand white rabbit hearts (2.0–2.5 kg, n = 25). The effects of CCM (± 20 mA, 10 ms phase duration) on the left ventricular basal and apical monophasic action potential duration (MAPD) were assessed during constant pacing (200 bpm). Ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) was defined as the minimum current required to induce sustained VF with rapid pacing (30 × 30 ms). Protocols were repeated during perfusion of the β1-adrenoceptor antagonist metoprolol (1.8 μM). In separate hearts, the dynamic and spatial electrophysiological effects of CCM were assessed using optical mapping with di-4-ANEPPS. RESULTS: CCM significantly shortened MAPD close to the stimulation site (Basal: 102 ± 5 [CCM] vs. 131 ± 6 [Control] ms, P < 0.001). VFT was reduced during CCM (2.6 ± 0.6 [CCM] vs. 6.1 ± 0.8 [Control] mA, P < 0.01) and was correlated (r(2) = 0.40, P < 0.01) with increased MAPD dispersion (26 ± 4 [CCM] vs. 5 ± 1 [Control] ms, P < 0.01) (n = 8). Optical mapping revealed greater spread of CCM induced MAPD shortening during basal vs. apical stimulation. CCM effects were abolished by metoprolol and exogenous acetylcholine. No evidence for direct electrotonic modulation of APD was found, with APD adaptation occurring secondary to adrenergic stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: CCM decreases VFT in a manner associated with increased MAPD dispersion in the crystalloid perfused normal rabbit heart.