Cargando…

Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level

BACKGROUND: The existence of introns in eukaryotic genes is believed to provide an evolutionary advantage by increasing protein diversity through exon shuffling and alternative splicing. However, this eukaryotic feature is associated with the necessity of exclusion of intronic sequences, which requi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorlova, Olga, Fedorov, Alexey, Logothetis, Christopher, Amos, Christopher, Gorlov, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24629165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-50
_version_ 1782312883526303744
author Gorlova, Olga
Fedorov, Alexey
Logothetis, Christopher
Amos, Christopher
Gorlov, Ivan
author_facet Gorlova, Olga
Fedorov, Alexey
Logothetis, Christopher
Amos, Christopher
Gorlov, Ivan
author_sort Gorlova, Olga
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The existence of introns in eukaryotic genes is believed to provide an evolutionary advantage by increasing protein diversity through exon shuffling and alternative splicing. However, this eukaryotic feature is associated with the necessity of exclusion of intronic sequences, which requires considerable energy expenditure and can lead to splicing errors. The relationship between intronic burden and evolution is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to analyze the relationship between the intronic burden and the level of evolutionary conservation of the gene. RESULTS: We found a positive correlation between the level of evolutionary conservation of a gene and its intronic burden. The level of evolutionary conservation was estimated using the conservation index (CI). The CI value was determined on the basis of the most distant ortholog of the human protein sequence and ranged from 0 (the gene was unique to the human genome) to 9 (an ortholog of the human gene was detected in plants). In multivariable model, both the number of introns and total intron size remained significant predictors of CI. We also found that the number of alternative splice variants was positively correlated with CI. The expression level of a gene was negatively correlated with the number of introns and total size of intronic region. Genes with a greater intronic burden had lower density of missense and nonsense mutations in the coding regions of the gene, which suggests that they are under a stronger pressure from purifying selection. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a positive association between intronic burden and CI. One of the possible explanations of this is the idea of a cost-benefits balance. Evolutionarily conserved (functionally important) genes can “afford” the negative consequences of maintaining multiple introns because these consequences are outweighed by the benefit of maintaining the gene. Evolutionarily conserved and functionally important genes may use introns to create novel splice variants to tune the gene function to developmental stage and tissue type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3995522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39955222014-04-23 Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level Gorlova, Olga Fedorov, Alexey Logothetis, Christopher Amos, Christopher Gorlov, Ivan BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The existence of introns in eukaryotic genes is believed to provide an evolutionary advantage by increasing protein diversity through exon shuffling and alternative splicing. However, this eukaryotic feature is associated with the necessity of exclusion of intronic sequences, which requires considerable energy expenditure and can lead to splicing errors. The relationship between intronic burden and evolution is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to analyze the relationship between the intronic burden and the level of evolutionary conservation of the gene. RESULTS: We found a positive correlation between the level of evolutionary conservation of a gene and its intronic burden. The level of evolutionary conservation was estimated using the conservation index (CI). The CI value was determined on the basis of the most distant ortholog of the human protein sequence and ranged from 0 (the gene was unique to the human genome) to 9 (an ortholog of the human gene was detected in plants). In multivariable model, both the number of introns and total intron size remained significant predictors of CI. We also found that the number of alternative splice variants was positively correlated with CI. The expression level of a gene was negatively correlated with the number of introns and total size of intronic region. Genes with a greater intronic burden had lower density of missense and nonsense mutations in the coding regions of the gene, which suggests that they are under a stronger pressure from purifying selection. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a positive association between intronic burden and CI. One of the possible explanations of this is the idea of a cost-benefits balance. Evolutionarily conserved (functionally important) genes can “afford” the negative consequences of maintaining multiple introns because these consequences are outweighed by the benefit of maintaining the gene. Evolutionarily conserved and functionally important genes may use introns to create novel splice variants to tune the gene function to developmental stage and tissue type. BioMed Central 2014-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3995522/ /pubmed/24629165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-50 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gorlova et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gorlova, Olga
Fedorov, Alexey
Logothetis, Christopher
Amos, Christopher
Gorlov, Ivan
Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level
title Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level
title_full Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level
title_fullStr Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level
title_full_unstemmed Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level
title_short Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level
title_sort genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24629165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-50
work_keys_str_mv AT gorlovaolga geneswithalargeintronicburdenshowgreaterevolutionaryconservationontheproteinlevel
AT fedorovalexey geneswithalargeintronicburdenshowgreaterevolutionaryconservationontheproteinlevel
AT logothetischristopher geneswithalargeintronicburdenshowgreaterevolutionaryconservationontheproteinlevel
AT amoschristopher geneswithalargeintronicburdenshowgreaterevolutionaryconservationontheproteinlevel
AT gorlovivan geneswithalargeintronicburdenshowgreaterevolutionaryconservationontheproteinlevel