Cargando…

Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process

The Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 is emerging as a therapeutic target for a large variety of health disorders. One distinguishing feature of KCa3.1 is that the channel open probability at saturating Ca(2+) concentrations (Pomax) is low, typically 0.1–0.2 for KCa3.1 wild type. This observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garneau, Line, Klein, Hélène, Lavoie, Marie-France, Brochiero, Emmanuelle, Parent, Lucie, Sauvé, Rémy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311097
_version_ 1782313753591676928
author Garneau, Line
Klein, Hélène
Lavoie, Marie-France
Brochiero, Emmanuelle
Parent, Lucie
Sauvé, Rémy
author_facet Garneau, Line
Klein, Hélène
Lavoie, Marie-France
Brochiero, Emmanuelle
Parent, Lucie
Sauvé, Rémy
author_sort Garneau, Line
collection PubMed
description The Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 is emerging as a therapeutic target for a large variety of health disorders. One distinguishing feature of KCa3.1 is that the channel open probability at saturating Ca(2+) concentrations (Pomax) is low, typically 0.1–0.2 for KCa3.1 wild type. This observation argues for the binding of Ca(2+) to the calmodulin (CaM)–KCa3.1 complex, promoting the formation of a preopen closed-state configuration leading to channel opening. We have previously shown that the KCa3.1 active gate is most likely located at the level of the selectivity filter. As Ca(2+)-dependent gating of KCa3.1 originates from the binding of Ca(2+) to CaM in the C terminus, the hypothesis of a gate located at the level of the selectivity filter requires that the conformational change initiated in the C terminus be transmitted to the S5 and S6 transmembrane helices, with a resulting effect on the channel pore helix directly connected to the selectivity filter. A study was thus undertaken to determine to what extent the interactions between the channel pore helix with the S5 and S6 transmembrane segments contribute to KCa3.1 gating. Molecular dynamics simulations first revealed that the largest contact area between the pore helix and the S5 plus S6 transmembrane helices involves residue F248 at the C-terminal end of the pore helix. Unitary current recordings next confirmed that modulating aromatic–aromatic interactions between F248 and W216 of the S5 transmembrane helical segment and/or perturbing the interactions between F248 and residues in S6 surrounding the glycine hinge G274 cause important changes in Pomax. This work thus provides the first evidence for a key contribution of the pore helix in setting Pomax by stabilizing the channel closed configuration through aromatic–aromatic interactions involving F248 of the pore helix. We propose that the interface pore helix/S5 constitutes a promising site for designing KCa3.1 potentiators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4001770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40017702014-08-01 Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process Garneau, Line Klein, Hélène Lavoie, Marie-France Brochiero, Emmanuelle Parent, Lucie Sauvé, Rémy J Gen Physiol Research Articles The Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 is emerging as a therapeutic target for a large variety of health disorders. One distinguishing feature of KCa3.1 is that the channel open probability at saturating Ca(2+) concentrations (Pomax) is low, typically 0.1–0.2 for KCa3.1 wild type. This observation argues for the binding of Ca(2+) to the calmodulin (CaM)–KCa3.1 complex, promoting the formation of a preopen closed-state configuration leading to channel opening. We have previously shown that the KCa3.1 active gate is most likely located at the level of the selectivity filter. As Ca(2+)-dependent gating of KCa3.1 originates from the binding of Ca(2+) to CaM in the C terminus, the hypothesis of a gate located at the level of the selectivity filter requires that the conformational change initiated in the C terminus be transmitted to the S5 and S6 transmembrane helices, with a resulting effect on the channel pore helix directly connected to the selectivity filter. A study was thus undertaken to determine to what extent the interactions between the channel pore helix with the S5 and S6 transmembrane segments contribute to KCa3.1 gating. Molecular dynamics simulations first revealed that the largest contact area between the pore helix and the S5 plus S6 transmembrane helices involves residue F248 at the C-terminal end of the pore helix. Unitary current recordings next confirmed that modulating aromatic–aromatic interactions between F248 and W216 of the S5 transmembrane helical segment and/or perturbing the interactions between F248 and residues in S6 surrounding the glycine hinge G274 cause important changes in Pomax. This work thus provides the first evidence for a key contribution of the pore helix in setting Pomax by stabilizing the channel closed configuration through aromatic–aromatic interactions involving F248 of the pore helix. We propose that the interface pore helix/S5 constitutes a promising site for designing KCa3.1 potentiators. The Rockefeller University Press 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4001770/ /pubmed/24470490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311097 Text en © 2014 Garneau et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Garneau, Line
Klein, Hélène
Lavoie, Marie-France
Brochiero, Emmanuelle
Parent, Lucie
Sauvé, Rémy
Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
title Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
title_full Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
title_fullStr Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
title_full_unstemmed Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
title_short Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
title_sort aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in kca3.1 pore helix and s5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311097
work_keys_str_mv AT garneauline aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess
AT kleinhelene aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess
AT lavoiemariefrance aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess
AT brochieroemmanuelle aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess
AT parentlucie aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess
AT sauveremy aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess