Cargando…
Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process
The Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 is emerging as a therapeutic target for a large variety of health disorders. One distinguishing feature of KCa3.1 is that the channel open probability at saturating Ca(2+) concentrations (Pomax) is low, typically 0.1–0.2 for KCa3.1 wild type. This observ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311097 |
_version_ | 1782313753591676928 |
---|---|
author | Garneau, Line Klein, Hélène Lavoie, Marie-France Brochiero, Emmanuelle Parent, Lucie Sauvé, Rémy |
author_facet | Garneau, Line Klein, Hélène Lavoie, Marie-France Brochiero, Emmanuelle Parent, Lucie Sauvé, Rémy |
author_sort | Garneau, Line |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 is emerging as a therapeutic target for a large variety of health disorders. One distinguishing feature of KCa3.1 is that the channel open probability at saturating Ca(2+) concentrations (Pomax) is low, typically 0.1–0.2 for KCa3.1 wild type. This observation argues for the binding of Ca(2+) to the calmodulin (CaM)–KCa3.1 complex, promoting the formation of a preopen closed-state configuration leading to channel opening. We have previously shown that the KCa3.1 active gate is most likely located at the level of the selectivity filter. As Ca(2+)-dependent gating of KCa3.1 originates from the binding of Ca(2+) to CaM in the C terminus, the hypothesis of a gate located at the level of the selectivity filter requires that the conformational change initiated in the C terminus be transmitted to the S5 and S6 transmembrane helices, with a resulting effect on the channel pore helix directly connected to the selectivity filter. A study was thus undertaken to determine to what extent the interactions between the channel pore helix with the S5 and S6 transmembrane segments contribute to KCa3.1 gating. Molecular dynamics simulations first revealed that the largest contact area between the pore helix and the S5 plus S6 transmembrane helices involves residue F248 at the C-terminal end of the pore helix. Unitary current recordings next confirmed that modulating aromatic–aromatic interactions between F248 and W216 of the S5 transmembrane helical segment and/or perturbing the interactions between F248 and residues in S6 surrounding the glycine hinge G274 cause important changes in Pomax. This work thus provides the first evidence for a key contribution of the pore helix in setting Pomax by stabilizing the channel closed configuration through aromatic–aromatic interactions involving F248 of the pore helix. We propose that the interface pore helix/S5 constitutes a promising site for designing KCa3.1 potentiators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4001770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40017702014-08-01 Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process Garneau, Line Klein, Hélène Lavoie, Marie-France Brochiero, Emmanuelle Parent, Lucie Sauvé, Rémy J Gen Physiol Research Articles The Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 is emerging as a therapeutic target for a large variety of health disorders. One distinguishing feature of KCa3.1 is that the channel open probability at saturating Ca(2+) concentrations (Pomax) is low, typically 0.1–0.2 for KCa3.1 wild type. This observation argues for the binding of Ca(2+) to the calmodulin (CaM)–KCa3.1 complex, promoting the formation of a preopen closed-state configuration leading to channel opening. We have previously shown that the KCa3.1 active gate is most likely located at the level of the selectivity filter. As Ca(2+)-dependent gating of KCa3.1 originates from the binding of Ca(2+) to CaM in the C terminus, the hypothesis of a gate located at the level of the selectivity filter requires that the conformational change initiated in the C terminus be transmitted to the S5 and S6 transmembrane helices, with a resulting effect on the channel pore helix directly connected to the selectivity filter. A study was thus undertaken to determine to what extent the interactions between the channel pore helix with the S5 and S6 transmembrane segments contribute to KCa3.1 gating. Molecular dynamics simulations first revealed that the largest contact area between the pore helix and the S5 plus S6 transmembrane helices involves residue F248 at the C-terminal end of the pore helix. Unitary current recordings next confirmed that modulating aromatic–aromatic interactions between F248 and W216 of the S5 transmembrane helical segment and/or perturbing the interactions between F248 and residues in S6 surrounding the glycine hinge G274 cause important changes in Pomax. This work thus provides the first evidence for a key contribution of the pore helix in setting Pomax by stabilizing the channel closed configuration through aromatic–aromatic interactions involving F248 of the pore helix. We propose that the interface pore helix/S5 constitutes a promising site for designing KCa3.1 potentiators. The Rockefeller University Press 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4001770/ /pubmed/24470490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311097 Text en © 2014 Garneau et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Garneau, Line Klein, Hélène Lavoie, Marie-France Brochiero, Emmanuelle Parent, Lucie Sauvé, Rémy Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process |
title | Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process |
title_full | Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process |
title_fullStr | Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process |
title_full_unstemmed | Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process |
title_short | Aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in KCa3.1 pore helix and S5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process |
title_sort | aromatic–aromatic interactions between residues in kca3.1 pore helix and s5 transmembrane segment control the channel gating process |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4001770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garneauline aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess AT kleinhelene aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess AT lavoiemariefrance aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess AT brochieroemmanuelle aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess AT parentlucie aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess AT sauveremy aromaticaromaticinteractionsbetweenresiduesinkca31porehelixands5transmembranesegmentcontrolthechannelgatingprocess |