Cargando…

Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms

The choice of a meaningful baseline condition is a crucial issue for each experimental design. In the case of cognitive emotion regulation, it is common to either let participants passively view emotional stimuli without any further specific instructions or to instruct them to actively attend to and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diers, Kersten, Weber, Fanny, Brocke, Burkhard, Strobel, Alexander, Schönfeld, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00347
_version_ 1782479766004170752
author Diers, Kersten
Weber, Fanny
Brocke, Burkhard
Strobel, Alexander
Schönfeld, Sabine
author_facet Diers, Kersten
Weber, Fanny
Brocke, Burkhard
Strobel, Alexander
Schönfeld, Sabine
author_sort Diers, Kersten
collection PubMed
description The choice of a meaningful baseline condition is a crucial issue for each experimental design. In the case of cognitive emotion regulation, it is common to either let participants passively view emotional stimuli without any further specific instructions or to instruct them to actively attend to and permit any arising emotions, and to contrast one of these baseline conditions with a regulation condition. While the “view” strategy can be assumed to allow for a more spontaneous emotional response, the “permit” strategy may result in a more pronounced affective and cognitive response. As these conceptual differences may be associated with differences both in subjective emotional experience and neural activation, we compared these two common control conditions within a single functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, during which participants were instructed to either passively view a set of unpleasant and neutral pictures or to actively permit any emotions arising in response to the unpleasant pictures. Trial-by-trial ratings confirmed that participants perceived the unpleasant pictures as more arousing than the neutral pictures, but also indicated higher subjective arousal during the “permit negative” as compared to the “view negative” and “view neutral” conditions. While both the “permit negative” and “view negative” conditions led to increased activation of the bilateral amygdala when contrasted with the passive viewing of neutral pictures, activation in the left amygdala was increased in response to the “permit” instruction as compared to the “view” instruction for unpleasant pictures. The increase in amygdala activation in both the “permit” and “view” conditions renders both strategies as suitable baseline conditions for studies of cognitive emotion regulation. Conceptual and activation differences, however, indicate that these two variants are not exchangeable and should be chosen depending on the experimental context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4009445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40094452014-05-07 Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms Diers, Kersten Weber, Fanny Brocke, Burkhard Strobel, Alexander Schönfeld, Sabine Front Psychol Psychology The choice of a meaningful baseline condition is a crucial issue for each experimental design. In the case of cognitive emotion regulation, it is common to either let participants passively view emotional stimuli without any further specific instructions or to instruct them to actively attend to and permit any arising emotions, and to contrast one of these baseline conditions with a regulation condition. While the “view” strategy can be assumed to allow for a more spontaneous emotional response, the “permit” strategy may result in a more pronounced affective and cognitive response. As these conceptual differences may be associated with differences both in subjective emotional experience and neural activation, we compared these two common control conditions within a single functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, during which participants were instructed to either passively view a set of unpleasant and neutral pictures or to actively permit any emotions arising in response to the unpleasant pictures. Trial-by-trial ratings confirmed that participants perceived the unpleasant pictures as more arousing than the neutral pictures, but also indicated higher subjective arousal during the “permit negative” as compared to the “view negative” and “view neutral” conditions. While both the “permit negative” and “view negative” conditions led to increased activation of the bilateral amygdala when contrasted with the passive viewing of neutral pictures, activation in the left amygdala was increased in response to the “permit” instruction as compared to the “view” instruction for unpleasant pictures. The increase in amygdala activation in both the “permit” and “view” conditions renders both strategies as suitable baseline conditions for studies of cognitive emotion regulation. Conceptual and activation differences, however, indicate that these two variants are not exchangeable and should be chosen depending on the experimental context. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4009445/ /pubmed/24808872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00347 Text en Copyright © 2014 Diers, Weber, Brocke, Strobel and Schönfeld. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Diers, Kersten
Weber, Fanny
Brocke, Burkhard
Strobel, Alexander
Schönfeld, Sabine
Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms
title Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms
title_full Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms
title_fullStr Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms
title_short Instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms
title_sort instructions matter: a comparison of baseline conditions for cognitive emotion regulation paradigms
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24808872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00347
work_keys_str_mv AT dierskersten instructionsmatteracomparisonofbaselineconditionsforcognitiveemotionregulationparadigms
AT weberfanny instructionsmatteracomparisonofbaselineconditionsforcognitiveemotionregulationparadigms
AT brockeburkhard instructionsmatteracomparisonofbaselineconditionsforcognitiveemotionregulationparadigms
AT strobelalexander instructionsmatteracomparisonofbaselineconditionsforcognitiveemotionregulationparadigms
AT schonfeldsabine instructionsmatteracomparisonofbaselineconditionsforcognitiveemotionregulationparadigms