Cargando…

Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

An acute myeloid leukemia was suspected of having a t(8;16)(p11;p13) resulting in a KAT6A-CREBBP fusion because the bone marrow was packed with monoblasts showing marked erythrophagocytosis. The diagnostic karyotype was 46,XY,add(1)(p13),t(8;21)(p11;q22),der(16)t(1;16)(p13;p13)[9]/46,XY[1]; thus, no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panagopoulos, Ioannis, Torkildsen, Synne, Gorunova, Ludmila, Tierens, Anne, Tjønnfjord, Geir E., Heim, Sverre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24798186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096570
_version_ 1782479870582849536
author Panagopoulos, Ioannis
Torkildsen, Synne
Gorunova, Ludmila
Tierens, Anne
Tjønnfjord, Geir E.
Heim, Sverre
author_facet Panagopoulos, Ioannis
Torkildsen, Synne
Gorunova, Ludmila
Tierens, Anne
Tjønnfjord, Geir E.
Heim, Sverre
author_sort Panagopoulos, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description An acute myeloid leukemia was suspected of having a t(8;16)(p11;p13) resulting in a KAT6A-CREBBP fusion because the bone marrow was packed with monoblasts showing marked erythrophagocytosis. The diagnostic karyotype was 46,XY,add(1)(p13),t(8;21)(p11;q22),der(16)t(1;16)(p13;p13)[9]/46,XY[1]; thus, no direct confirmation of the suspicion could be given although both 8p11 and 16p13 seemed to be rearranged. The leukemic cells were examined in two ways to find out whether a cryptic KAT6A-CREBBP was present. The first was the “conventional” approach: G-banding was followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The second was RNA-Seq followed by data analysis using FusionMap and FusionFinder programs with special emphasis on candidates located in the 1p13, 8p11, 16p13, and 21q22 breakpoints. FISH analysis indicated the presence of a KAT6A/CREBBP chimera. RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing of the amplified product showed that a chimeric KAT6A-CREBBP transcript was present in the patients bone marrow. Surprisingly, however, KATA6A-CREBBP was not among the 874 and 35 fusion transcripts identified by the FusionMap and FusionFinder programs, respectively, although 11 sequences of the raw RNA-sequencing data were KATA6A-CREBBP fragments. This illustrates that although many fusion transcripts can be found by RNA-Seq combined with FusionMap and FusionFinder, the pathogenetically essential fusion is not always picked up by the bioinformatic algorithms behind these programs. The present study not only illustrates potential pitfalls of current data analysis programs of whole transcriptome sequences which make them less useful as stand-alone techniques, but also that leukemia diagnosis still relies on integration of clinical, hematologic, and genetic disease features of which the former two by no means have become superfluous.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4010518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40105182014-05-09 Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Panagopoulos, Ioannis Torkildsen, Synne Gorunova, Ludmila Tierens, Anne Tjønnfjord, Geir E. Heim, Sverre PLoS One Research Article An acute myeloid leukemia was suspected of having a t(8;16)(p11;p13) resulting in a KAT6A-CREBBP fusion because the bone marrow was packed with monoblasts showing marked erythrophagocytosis. The diagnostic karyotype was 46,XY,add(1)(p13),t(8;21)(p11;q22),der(16)t(1;16)(p13;p13)[9]/46,XY[1]; thus, no direct confirmation of the suspicion could be given although both 8p11 and 16p13 seemed to be rearranged. The leukemic cells were examined in two ways to find out whether a cryptic KAT6A-CREBBP was present. The first was the “conventional” approach: G-banding was followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The second was RNA-Seq followed by data analysis using FusionMap and FusionFinder programs with special emphasis on candidates located in the 1p13, 8p11, 16p13, and 21q22 breakpoints. FISH analysis indicated the presence of a KAT6A/CREBBP chimera. RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing of the amplified product showed that a chimeric KAT6A-CREBBP transcript was present in the patients bone marrow. Surprisingly, however, KATA6A-CREBBP was not among the 874 and 35 fusion transcripts identified by the FusionMap and FusionFinder programs, respectively, although 11 sequences of the raw RNA-sequencing data were KATA6A-CREBBP fragments. This illustrates that although many fusion transcripts can be found by RNA-Seq combined with FusionMap and FusionFinder, the pathogenetically essential fusion is not always picked up by the bioinformatic algorithms behind these programs. The present study not only illustrates potential pitfalls of current data analysis programs of whole transcriptome sequences which make them less useful as stand-alone techniques, but also that leukemia diagnosis still relies on integration of clinical, hematologic, and genetic disease features of which the former two by no means have become superfluous. Public Library of Science 2014-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4010518/ /pubmed/24798186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096570 Text en © 2014 Panagopoulos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Panagopoulos, Ioannis
Torkildsen, Synne
Gorunova, Ludmila
Tierens, Anne
Tjønnfjord, Geir E.
Heim, Sverre
Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_fullStr Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_short Comparison between Karyotyping-FISH-Reverse Transcription PCR and RNA- Sequencing-Fusion Gene Identification Programs in the Detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_sort comparison between karyotyping-fish-reverse transcription pcr and rna- sequencing-fusion gene identification programs in the detection of kat6a-crebbp in acute myeloid leukemia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24798186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096570
work_keys_str_mv AT panagopoulosioannis comparisonbetweenkaryotypingfishreversetranscriptionpcrandrnasequencingfusiongeneidentificationprogramsinthedetectionofkat6acrebbpinacutemyeloidleukemia
AT torkildsensynne comparisonbetweenkaryotypingfishreversetranscriptionpcrandrnasequencingfusiongeneidentificationprogramsinthedetectionofkat6acrebbpinacutemyeloidleukemia
AT gorunovaludmila comparisonbetweenkaryotypingfishreversetranscriptionpcrandrnasequencingfusiongeneidentificationprogramsinthedetectionofkat6acrebbpinacutemyeloidleukemia
AT tierensanne comparisonbetweenkaryotypingfishreversetranscriptionpcrandrnasequencingfusiongeneidentificationprogramsinthedetectionofkat6acrebbpinacutemyeloidleukemia
AT tjønnfjordgeire comparisonbetweenkaryotypingfishreversetranscriptionpcrandrnasequencingfusiongeneidentificationprogramsinthedetectionofkat6acrebbpinacutemyeloidleukemia
AT heimsverre comparisonbetweenkaryotypingfishreversetranscriptionpcrandrnasequencingfusiongeneidentificationprogramsinthedetectionofkat6acrebbpinacutemyeloidleukemia