Cargando…

mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach

BACKGROUND: mRNA translation involves simultaneous movement of multiple ribosomes on the mRNA and is also subject to regulatory mechanisms at different stages. Translation can be described by various codon-based models, including ODE, TASEP, and Petri net models. Although such models have been exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yun-Bo, Krishnan, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24576337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-25
_version_ 1782315368352579584
author Zhao, Yun-Bo
Krishnan, J
author_facet Zhao, Yun-Bo
Krishnan, J
author_sort Zhao, Yun-Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: mRNA translation involves simultaneous movement of multiple ribosomes on the mRNA and is also subject to regulatory mechanisms at different stages. Translation can be described by various codon-based models, including ODE, TASEP, and Petri net models. Although such models have been extensively used, the overlap and differences between these models and the implications of the assumptions of each model has not been systematically elucidated. The selection of the most appropriate modelling framework, and the most appropriate way to develop coarse-grained/fine-grained models in different contexts is not clear. RESULTS: We systematically analyze and compare how different modelling methodologies can be used to describe translation. We define various statistically equivalent codon-based simulation algorithms and analyze the importance of the update rule in determining the steady state, an aspect often neglected. Then a novel probabilistic Boolean network (PBN) model is proposed for modelling translation, which enjoys an exact numerical solution. This solution matches those of numerical simulation from other methods and acts as a complementary tool to analytical approximations and simulations. The advantages and limitations of various codon-based models are compared, and illustrated by examples with real biological complexities such as slow codons, premature termination and feedback regulation. Our studies reveal that while different models gives broadly similiar trends in many cases, important differences also arise and can be clearly seen, in the dependence of the translation rate on different parameters. Furthermore, the update rule affects the steady state solution. CONCLUSIONS: The codon-based models are based on different levels of abstraction. Our analysis suggests that a multiple model approach to understanding translation allows one to ascertain which aspects of the conclusions are robust with respect to the choice of modelling methodology, and when (and why) important differences may arise. This approach also allows for an optimal use of analysis tools, which is especially important when additional complexities or regulatory mechanisms are included. This approach can provide a robust platform for dissecting translation, and results in an improved predictive framework for applications in systems and synthetic biology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4015640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40156402014-05-23 mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach Zhao, Yun-Bo Krishnan, J BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: mRNA translation involves simultaneous movement of multiple ribosomes on the mRNA and is also subject to regulatory mechanisms at different stages. Translation can be described by various codon-based models, including ODE, TASEP, and Petri net models. Although such models have been extensively used, the overlap and differences between these models and the implications of the assumptions of each model has not been systematically elucidated. The selection of the most appropriate modelling framework, and the most appropriate way to develop coarse-grained/fine-grained models in different contexts is not clear. RESULTS: We systematically analyze and compare how different modelling methodologies can be used to describe translation. We define various statistically equivalent codon-based simulation algorithms and analyze the importance of the update rule in determining the steady state, an aspect often neglected. Then a novel probabilistic Boolean network (PBN) model is proposed for modelling translation, which enjoys an exact numerical solution. This solution matches those of numerical simulation from other methods and acts as a complementary tool to analytical approximations and simulations. The advantages and limitations of various codon-based models are compared, and illustrated by examples with real biological complexities such as slow codons, premature termination and feedback regulation. Our studies reveal that while different models gives broadly similiar trends in many cases, important differences also arise and can be clearly seen, in the dependence of the translation rate on different parameters. Furthermore, the update rule affects the steady state solution. CONCLUSIONS: The codon-based models are based on different levels of abstraction. Our analysis suggests that a multiple model approach to understanding translation allows one to ascertain which aspects of the conclusions are robust with respect to the choice of modelling methodology, and when (and why) important differences may arise. This approach also allows for an optimal use of analysis tools, which is especially important when additional complexities or regulatory mechanisms are included. This approach can provide a robust platform for dissecting translation, and results in an improved predictive framework for applications in systems and synthetic biology. BioMed Central 2014-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4015640/ /pubmed/24576337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-25 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zhao and Krishnan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Yun-Bo
Krishnan, J
mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach
title mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach
title_full mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach
title_fullStr mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach
title_full_unstemmed mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach
title_short mRNA translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new PBN based approach
title_sort mrna translation and protein synthesis: an analysis of different modelling methodologies and a new pbn based approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4015640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24576337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-25
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyunbo mrnatranslationandproteinsynthesisananalysisofdifferentmodellingmethodologiesandanewpbnbasedapproach
AT krishnanj mrnatranslationandproteinsynthesisananalysisofdifferentmodellingmethodologiesandanewpbnbasedapproach