Cargando…
Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies
BACKGROUND: Fractures are important causes of healthy damage and economic loss nowadays. The conclusions of observational studies on tea consumption and fracture risk are still inconsistent. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the effect of tea drinking on the risk of fractures. METH...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-44 |
_version_ | 1782480005298651136 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Bo Shi, Hai-Fei Wu, Shou-Cheng |
author_facet | Chen, Bo Shi, Hai-Fei Wu, Shou-Cheng |
author_sort | Chen, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fractures are important causes of healthy damage and economic loss nowadays. The conclusions of observational studies on tea consumption and fracture risk are still inconsistent. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the effect of tea drinking on the risk of fractures. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and reference lists of the relevant articles. Observational studies that reported an estimate of the association between tea drinking and incidence of fractures were included. A meta-analysis was conducted by the STATA software. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies involving 147,950 individuals that examined the association between tea consumption and risk of fractures were included in this meta-analysis. The odds risks (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. The pooled OR of 9 observational studies for the tea consumption on risk of fracture was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04). In the subgroup analyses, no significant association was detected in neither cohort studies (n = 3; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.06) nor case–control studies (n = 6; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.70-1.19), respectively. No significant association was detected in the dose–response meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Tea consumption might not be associated with the risk of fractures. The following large-sample and well-designed studies are required to confirm the existing conclusions. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5309904231178427. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4017777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40177772014-05-13 Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies Chen, Bo Shi, Hai-Fei Wu, Shou-Cheng Diagn Pathol Research BACKGROUND: Fractures are important causes of healthy damage and economic loss nowadays. The conclusions of observational studies on tea consumption and fracture risk are still inconsistent. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the effect of tea drinking on the risk of fractures. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and reference lists of the relevant articles. Observational studies that reported an estimate of the association between tea drinking and incidence of fractures were included. A meta-analysis was conducted by the STATA software. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies involving 147,950 individuals that examined the association between tea consumption and risk of fractures were included in this meta-analysis. The odds risks (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. The pooled OR of 9 observational studies for the tea consumption on risk of fracture was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04). In the subgroup analyses, no significant association was detected in neither cohort studies (n = 3; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.06) nor case–control studies (n = 6; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.70-1.19), respectively. No significant association was detected in the dose–response meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Tea consumption might not be associated with the risk of fractures. The following large-sample and well-designed studies are required to confirm the existing conclusions. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5309904231178427. BioMed Central 2014-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4017777/ /pubmed/24588938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-44 Text en Copyright © 2014 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Bo Shi, Hai-Fei Wu, Shou-Cheng Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies |
title | Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies |
title_full | Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies |
title_fullStr | Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies |
title_short | Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies |
title_sort | tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: a dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-44 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenbo teaconsumptiondidntmodifytheriskoffractureadoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT shihaifei teaconsumptiondidntmodifytheriskoffractureadoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT wushoucheng teaconsumptiondidntmodifytheriskoffractureadoseresponsemetaanalysisofobservationalstudies |