Cargando…
A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen an abundance of transcriptional profiling studies of preclinical models of persistent pain, predominantly employing microarray technology. In this study we directly compare exon microarrays to RNA-seq and investigate the ability of both platforms to detect differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-10-7 |
_version_ | 1782316268579192832 |
---|---|
author | Perkins, James R Antunes-Martins, Ana Calvo, Margarita Grist, John Rust, Werner Schmid, Ramona Hildebrandt, Tobias Kohl, Matthias Orengo, Christine McMahon, Stephen B Bennett, David LH |
author_facet | Perkins, James R Antunes-Martins, Ana Calvo, Margarita Grist, John Rust, Werner Schmid, Ramona Hildebrandt, Tobias Kohl, Matthias Orengo, Christine McMahon, Stephen B Bennett, David LH |
author_sort | Perkins, James R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen an abundance of transcriptional profiling studies of preclinical models of persistent pain, predominantly employing microarray technology. In this study we directly compare exon microarrays to RNA-seq and investigate the ability of both platforms to detect differentially expressed genes following nerve injury using the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain. We also investigate the effects of increasing RNA-seq sequencing depth. Finally we take advantage of the “agnostic” approach of RNA-seq to discover areas of expression outside of annotated exons that show marked changes in expression following nerve injury. RESULTS: RNA-seq and microarrays largely agree in terms of the genes called as differentially expressed. However, RNA-seq is able to interrogate a much larger proportion of the genome. It can also detect a greater number of differentially expressed genes than microarrays, across a wider range of fold changes and is able to assign a larger range of expression values to the genes it measures. The number of differentially expressed genes detected increases with sequencing depth. RNA-seq also allows the discovery of a number of genes displaying unusual and interesting patterns of non-exonic expression following nerve injury, an effect that cannot be detected using microarrays. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of RNA-seq for future high-throughput transcriptomic experiments in pain studies. RNA-seq allowed the identification of a larger number of putative candidate pain genes than microarrays and can also detect a wider range of expression values in a neuropathic pain model. In addition, RNA-seq can interrogate the whole genome regardless of prior annotations, being able to detect transcription from areas of the genome not currently annotated as exons. Some of these areas are differentially expressed following nerve injury, and may represent novel genes or isoforms. We also recommend the use of a high sequencing depth in order to detect differential expression for genes with low levels of expression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4021616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40216162014-05-16 A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat Perkins, James R Antunes-Martins, Ana Calvo, Margarita Grist, John Rust, Werner Schmid, Ramona Hildebrandt, Tobias Kohl, Matthias Orengo, Christine McMahon, Stephen B Bennett, David LH Mol Pain Research BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen an abundance of transcriptional profiling studies of preclinical models of persistent pain, predominantly employing microarray technology. In this study we directly compare exon microarrays to RNA-seq and investigate the ability of both platforms to detect differentially expressed genes following nerve injury using the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain. We also investigate the effects of increasing RNA-seq sequencing depth. Finally we take advantage of the “agnostic” approach of RNA-seq to discover areas of expression outside of annotated exons that show marked changes in expression following nerve injury. RESULTS: RNA-seq and microarrays largely agree in terms of the genes called as differentially expressed. However, RNA-seq is able to interrogate a much larger proportion of the genome. It can also detect a greater number of differentially expressed genes than microarrays, across a wider range of fold changes and is able to assign a larger range of expression values to the genes it measures. The number of differentially expressed genes detected increases with sequencing depth. RNA-seq also allows the discovery of a number of genes displaying unusual and interesting patterns of non-exonic expression following nerve injury, an effect that cannot be detected using microarrays. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of RNA-seq for future high-throughput transcriptomic experiments in pain studies. RNA-seq allowed the identification of a larger number of putative candidate pain genes than microarrays and can also detect a wider range of expression values in a neuropathic pain model. In addition, RNA-seq can interrogate the whole genome regardless of prior annotations, being able to detect transcription from areas of the genome not currently annotated as exons. Some of these areas are differentially expressed following nerve injury, and may represent novel genes or isoforms. We also recommend the use of a high sequencing depth in order to detect differential expression for genes with low levels of expression. BioMed Central 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4021616/ /pubmed/24472155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-10-7 Text en Copyright © 2014 Perkins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Perkins, James R Antunes-Martins, Ana Calvo, Margarita Grist, John Rust, Werner Schmid, Ramona Hildebrandt, Tobias Kohl, Matthias Orengo, Christine McMahon, Stephen B Bennett, David LH A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat |
title | A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat |
title_full | A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat |
title_fullStr | A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat |
title_short | A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat |
title_sort | comparison of rna-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the l5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-10-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perkinsjamesr acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT antunesmartinsana acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT calvomargarita acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT gristjohn acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT rustwerner acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT schmidramona acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT hildebrandttobias acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT kohlmatthias acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT orengochristine acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT mcmahonstephenb acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT bennettdavidlh acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT perkinsjamesr comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT antunesmartinsana comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT calvomargarita comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT gristjohn comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT rustwerner comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT schmidramona comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT hildebrandttobias comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT kohlmatthias comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT orengochristine comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT mcmahonstephenb comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat AT bennettdavidlh comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat |