Cargando…

A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat

BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen an abundance of transcriptional profiling studies of preclinical models of persistent pain, predominantly employing microarray technology. In this study we directly compare exon microarrays to RNA-seq and investigate the ability of both platforms to detect differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perkins, James R, Antunes-Martins, Ana, Calvo, Margarita, Grist, John, Rust, Werner, Schmid, Ramona, Hildebrandt, Tobias, Kohl, Matthias, Orengo, Christine, McMahon, Stephen B, Bennett, David LH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-10-7
_version_ 1782316268579192832
author Perkins, James R
Antunes-Martins, Ana
Calvo, Margarita
Grist, John
Rust, Werner
Schmid, Ramona
Hildebrandt, Tobias
Kohl, Matthias
Orengo, Christine
McMahon, Stephen B
Bennett, David LH
author_facet Perkins, James R
Antunes-Martins, Ana
Calvo, Margarita
Grist, John
Rust, Werner
Schmid, Ramona
Hildebrandt, Tobias
Kohl, Matthias
Orengo, Christine
McMahon, Stephen B
Bennett, David LH
author_sort Perkins, James R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen an abundance of transcriptional profiling studies of preclinical models of persistent pain, predominantly employing microarray technology. In this study we directly compare exon microarrays to RNA-seq and investigate the ability of both platforms to detect differentially expressed genes following nerve injury using the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain. We also investigate the effects of increasing RNA-seq sequencing depth. Finally we take advantage of the “agnostic” approach of RNA-seq to discover areas of expression outside of annotated exons that show marked changes in expression following nerve injury. RESULTS: RNA-seq and microarrays largely agree in terms of the genes called as differentially expressed. However, RNA-seq is able to interrogate a much larger proportion of the genome. It can also detect a greater number of differentially expressed genes than microarrays, across a wider range of fold changes and is able to assign a larger range of expression values to the genes it measures. The number of differentially expressed genes detected increases with sequencing depth. RNA-seq also allows the discovery of a number of genes displaying unusual and interesting patterns of non-exonic expression following nerve injury, an effect that cannot be detected using microarrays. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of RNA-seq for future high-throughput transcriptomic experiments in pain studies. RNA-seq allowed the identification of a larger number of putative candidate pain genes than microarrays and can also detect a wider range of expression values in a neuropathic pain model. In addition, RNA-seq can interrogate the whole genome regardless of prior annotations, being able to detect transcription from areas of the genome not currently annotated as exons. Some of these areas are differentially expressed following nerve injury, and may represent novel genes or isoforms. We also recommend the use of a high sequencing depth in order to detect differential expression for genes with low levels of expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4021616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40216162014-05-16 A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat Perkins, James R Antunes-Martins, Ana Calvo, Margarita Grist, John Rust, Werner Schmid, Ramona Hildebrandt, Tobias Kohl, Matthias Orengo, Christine McMahon, Stephen B Bennett, David LH Mol Pain Research BACKGROUND: The past decade has seen an abundance of transcriptional profiling studies of preclinical models of persistent pain, predominantly employing microarray technology. In this study we directly compare exon microarrays to RNA-seq and investigate the ability of both platforms to detect differentially expressed genes following nerve injury using the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain. We also investigate the effects of increasing RNA-seq sequencing depth. Finally we take advantage of the “agnostic” approach of RNA-seq to discover areas of expression outside of annotated exons that show marked changes in expression following nerve injury. RESULTS: RNA-seq and microarrays largely agree in terms of the genes called as differentially expressed. However, RNA-seq is able to interrogate a much larger proportion of the genome. It can also detect a greater number of differentially expressed genes than microarrays, across a wider range of fold changes and is able to assign a larger range of expression values to the genes it measures. The number of differentially expressed genes detected increases with sequencing depth. RNA-seq also allows the discovery of a number of genes displaying unusual and interesting patterns of non-exonic expression following nerve injury, an effect that cannot be detected using microarrays. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of RNA-seq for future high-throughput transcriptomic experiments in pain studies. RNA-seq allowed the identification of a larger number of putative candidate pain genes than microarrays and can also detect a wider range of expression values in a neuropathic pain model. In addition, RNA-seq can interrogate the whole genome regardless of prior annotations, being able to detect transcription from areas of the genome not currently annotated as exons. Some of these areas are differentially expressed following nerve injury, and may represent novel genes or isoforms. We also recommend the use of a high sequencing depth in order to detect differential expression for genes with low levels of expression. BioMed Central 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4021616/ /pubmed/24472155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-10-7 Text en Copyright © 2014 Perkins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Perkins, James R
Antunes-Martins, Ana
Calvo, Margarita
Grist, John
Rust, Werner
Schmid, Ramona
Hildebrandt, Tobias
Kohl, Matthias
Orengo, Christine
McMahon, Stephen B
Bennett, David LH
A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
title A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
title_full A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
title_fullStr A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
title_short A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
title_sort comparison of rna-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the l5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4021616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-10-7
work_keys_str_mv AT perkinsjamesr acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT antunesmartinsana acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT calvomargarita acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT gristjohn acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT rustwerner acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT schmidramona acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT hildebrandttobias acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT kohlmatthias acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT orengochristine acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT mcmahonstephenb acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT bennettdavidlh acomparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT perkinsjamesr comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT antunesmartinsana comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT calvomargarita comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT gristjohn comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT rustwerner comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT schmidramona comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT hildebrandttobias comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT kohlmatthias comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT orengochristine comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT mcmahonstephenb comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat
AT bennettdavidlh comparisonofrnaseqandexonarraysforwholegenometranscriptionprofilingofthel5spinalnervetransectionmodelofneuropathicpainintherat