Cargando…

Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study

BACKGROUND: Neurology is complex, abstract, and difficult for students to learn. However, a good learning method for neurology clerkship training is required to help students quickly develop strong clinical thinking as well as problem-solving skills. Both the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Lian-Hong, Jiang, Long-Yuan, Xu, Bing, Liu, Shu-Qiong, Liang, Yan-Ran, Ye, Jin-Hao, Tao, En-Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-98
_version_ 1782318211377659904
author Yang, Lian-Hong
Jiang, Long-Yuan
Xu, Bing
Liu, Shu-Qiong
Liang, Yan-Ran
Ye, Jin-Hao
Tao, En-Xiang
author_facet Yang, Lian-Hong
Jiang, Long-Yuan
Xu, Bing
Liu, Shu-Qiong
Liang, Yan-Ran
Ye, Jin-Hao
Tao, En-Xiang
author_sort Yang, Lian-Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neurology is complex, abstract, and difficult for students to learn. However, a good learning method for neurology clerkship training is required to help students quickly develop strong clinical thinking as well as problem-solving skills. Both the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) and the relatively new team-based learning (TBL) methods have inherent strengths and weaknesses when applied to neurology clerkship education. However, the strengths of each method may complement the weaknesses of the other. Combining TBL with LBL may produce better learning outcomes than TBL or LBL alone. We propose a hybrid method (TBL + LBL) and designed an experiment to compare the learning outcomes with those of pure LBL and pure TBL. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven fourth-year medical students attended a two-week neurology clerkship program organized by the Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. All of the students were from Grade 2007, Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University. These students were assigned to one of three groups randomly: Group A (TBL + LBL, with 41 students), Group B (LBL, with 43 students), and Group C (TBL, with 43 students). The learning outcomes were evaluated by a questionnaire and two tests covering basic knowledge of neurology and clinical practice. RESULTS: The practice test scores of Group A were similar to those of Group B, but significantly higher than those of Group C. The theoretical test scores and the total scores of Group A were significantly higher than those of Groups B and C. In addition, 100% of the students in Group A were satisfied with the combination of TBL + LBL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support our proposal that the combination of TBL + LBL is acceptable to students and produces better learning outcomes than either method alone in neurology clerkships. In addition, the proposed hybrid method may also be suited for other medical clerkships that require students to absorb a large amount of abstract and complex course materials in a short period, such as pediatrics and internal medicine clerkships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4037118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40371182014-05-29 Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study Yang, Lian-Hong Jiang, Long-Yuan Xu, Bing Liu, Shu-Qiong Liang, Yan-Ran Ye, Jin-Hao Tao, En-Xiang BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Neurology is complex, abstract, and difficult for students to learn. However, a good learning method for neurology clerkship training is required to help students quickly develop strong clinical thinking as well as problem-solving skills. Both the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) and the relatively new team-based learning (TBL) methods have inherent strengths and weaknesses when applied to neurology clerkship education. However, the strengths of each method may complement the weaknesses of the other. Combining TBL with LBL may produce better learning outcomes than TBL or LBL alone. We propose a hybrid method (TBL + LBL) and designed an experiment to compare the learning outcomes with those of pure LBL and pure TBL. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven fourth-year medical students attended a two-week neurology clerkship program organized by the Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. All of the students were from Grade 2007, Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University. These students were assigned to one of three groups randomly: Group A (TBL + LBL, with 41 students), Group B (LBL, with 43 students), and Group C (TBL, with 43 students). The learning outcomes were evaluated by a questionnaire and two tests covering basic knowledge of neurology and clinical practice. RESULTS: The practice test scores of Group A were similar to those of Group B, but significantly higher than those of Group C. The theoretical test scores and the total scores of Group A were significantly higher than those of Groups B and C. In addition, 100% of the students in Group A were satisfied with the combination of TBL + LBL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support our proposal that the combination of TBL + LBL is acceptable to students and produces better learning outcomes than either method alone in neurology clerkships. In addition, the proposed hybrid method may also be suited for other medical clerkships that require students to absorb a large amount of abstract and complex course materials in a short period, such as pediatrics and internal medicine clerkships. BioMed Central 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4037118/ /pubmed/24884854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-98 Text en Copyright © 2014 Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Lian-Hong
Jiang, Long-Yuan
Xu, Bing
Liu, Shu-Qiong
Liang, Yan-Ran
Ye, Jin-Hao
Tao, En-Xiang
Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
title Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
title_full Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
title_fullStr Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
title_short Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
title_sort evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in china: a method-comparison study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-98
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglianhong evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy
AT jianglongyuan evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy
AT xubing evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy
AT liushuqiong evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy
AT liangyanran evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy
AT yejinhao evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy
AT taoenxiang evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy