Cargando…
Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study
BACKGROUND: Neurology is complex, abstract, and difficult for students to learn. However, a good learning method for neurology clerkship training is required to help students quickly develop strong clinical thinking as well as problem-solving skills. Both the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-98 |
_version_ | 1782318211377659904 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Lian-Hong Jiang, Long-Yuan Xu, Bing Liu, Shu-Qiong Liang, Yan-Ran Ye, Jin-Hao Tao, En-Xiang |
author_facet | Yang, Lian-Hong Jiang, Long-Yuan Xu, Bing Liu, Shu-Qiong Liang, Yan-Ran Ye, Jin-Hao Tao, En-Xiang |
author_sort | Yang, Lian-Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neurology is complex, abstract, and difficult for students to learn. However, a good learning method for neurology clerkship training is required to help students quickly develop strong clinical thinking as well as problem-solving skills. Both the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) and the relatively new team-based learning (TBL) methods have inherent strengths and weaknesses when applied to neurology clerkship education. However, the strengths of each method may complement the weaknesses of the other. Combining TBL with LBL may produce better learning outcomes than TBL or LBL alone. We propose a hybrid method (TBL + LBL) and designed an experiment to compare the learning outcomes with those of pure LBL and pure TBL. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven fourth-year medical students attended a two-week neurology clerkship program organized by the Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. All of the students were from Grade 2007, Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University. These students were assigned to one of three groups randomly: Group A (TBL + LBL, with 41 students), Group B (LBL, with 43 students), and Group C (TBL, with 43 students). The learning outcomes were evaluated by a questionnaire and two tests covering basic knowledge of neurology and clinical practice. RESULTS: The practice test scores of Group A were similar to those of Group B, but significantly higher than those of Group C. The theoretical test scores and the total scores of Group A were significantly higher than those of Groups B and C. In addition, 100% of the students in Group A were satisfied with the combination of TBL + LBL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support our proposal that the combination of TBL + LBL is acceptable to students and produces better learning outcomes than either method alone in neurology clerkships. In addition, the proposed hybrid method may also be suited for other medical clerkships that require students to absorb a large amount of abstract and complex course materials in a short period, such as pediatrics and internal medicine clerkships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4037118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40371182014-05-29 Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study Yang, Lian-Hong Jiang, Long-Yuan Xu, Bing Liu, Shu-Qiong Liang, Yan-Ran Ye, Jin-Hao Tao, En-Xiang BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Neurology is complex, abstract, and difficult for students to learn. However, a good learning method for neurology clerkship training is required to help students quickly develop strong clinical thinking as well as problem-solving skills. Both the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) and the relatively new team-based learning (TBL) methods have inherent strengths and weaknesses when applied to neurology clerkship education. However, the strengths of each method may complement the weaknesses of the other. Combining TBL with LBL may produce better learning outcomes than TBL or LBL alone. We propose a hybrid method (TBL + LBL) and designed an experiment to compare the learning outcomes with those of pure LBL and pure TBL. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven fourth-year medical students attended a two-week neurology clerkship program organized by the Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. All of the students were from Grade 2007, Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University. These students were assigned to one of three groups randomly: Group A (TBL + LBL, with 41 students), Group B (LBL, with 43 students), and Group C (TBL, with 43 students). The learning outcomes were evaluated by a questionnaire and two tests covering basic knowledge of neurology and clinical practice. RESULTS: The practice test scores of Group A were similar to those of Group B, but significantly higher than those of Group C. The theoretical test scores and the total scores of Group A were significantly higher than those of Groups B and C. In addition, 100% of the students in Group A were satisfied with the combination of TBL + LBL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support our proposal that the combination of TBL + LBL is acceptable to students and produces better learning outcomes than either method alone in neurology clerkships. In addition, the proposed hybrid method may also be suited for other medical clerkships that require students to absorb a large amount of abstract and complex course materials in a short period, such as pediatrics and internal medicine clerkships. BioMed Central 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4037118/ /pubmed/24884854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-98 Text en Copyright © 2014 Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Lian-Hong Jiang, Long-Yuan Xu, Bing Liu, Shu-Qiong Liang, Yan-Ran Ye, Jin-Hao Tao, En-Xiang Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study |
title | Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study |
title_full | Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study |
title_short | Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study |
title_sort | evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in china: a method-comparison study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-98 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanglianhong evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy AT jianglongyuan evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy AT xubing evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy AT liushuqiong evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy AT liangyanran evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy AT yejinhao evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy AT taoenxiang evaluatingteambasedlecturebasedandhybridlearningmethodsforneurologyclerkshipinchinaamethodcomparisonstudy |