Cargando…

Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition

Speech is characterized by phonemes and prosody. Neurocognitive evidence supports the separate processing of each type of information. Therefore, one might suggest individual development of both pathways. In this study, we examine literacy acquisition in middle childhood. Children become aware of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schild, Ulrike, Becker, Angelika B. C., Friedrich, Claudia K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24917838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00530
_version_ 1782318757483380736
author Schild, Ulrike
Becker, Angelika B. C.
Friedrich, Claudia K.
author_facet Schild, Ulrike
Becker, Angelika B. C.
Friedrich, Claudia K.
author_sort Schild, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description Speech is characterized by phonemes and prosody. Neurocognitive evidence supports the separate processing of each type of information. Therefore, one might suggest individual development of both pathways. In this study, we examine literacy acquisition in middle childhood. Children become aware of the phonemes in speech at that time and refine phoneme processing when they acquire an alphabetic writing system. We test whether an enhanced sensitivity to phonemes in middle childhood extends to other aspects of the speech signal, such as prosody. To investigate prosodic processing, we used stress priming. Spoken stressed and unstressed syllables (primes) preceded spoken German words with stress on the first syllable (targets). We orthogonally varied stress overlap and phoneme overlap between the primes and onsets of the targets. Lexical decisions and Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) for the targets were obtained for pre-reading preschoolers, reading pupils and adults. The behavioral and ERP results were largely comparable across all groups. The fastest responses were observed when the first syllable of the target word shared stress and phonemes with the preceding prime. ERP stress priming and ERP phoneme priming started 200 ms after the target word onset. Bilateral ERP stress priming was characterized by enhanced ERP amplitudes for stress overlap. Left-lateralized ERP phoneme priming replicates previously observed reduced ERP amplitudes for phoneme overlap. Groups differed in the strength of the behavioral phoneme priming and in the late ERP phoneme priming effect. The present results show that enhanced phonological processing in middle childhood is restricted to phonemes and does not extend to prosody. These results are indicative of two parallel processing systems for phonemes and prosody that might follow different developmental trajectories in middle childhood as a function of alphabetic literacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4042081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40420812014-06-10 Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition Schild, Ulrike Becker, Angelika B. C. Friedrich, Claudia K. Front Psychol Psychology Speech is characterized by phonemes and prosody. Neurocognitive evidence supports the separate processing of each type of information. Therefore, one might suggest individual development of both pathways. In this study, we examine literacy acquisition in middle childhood. Children become aware of the phonemes in speech at that time and refine phoneme processing when they acquire an alphabetic writing system. We test whether an enhanced sensitivity to phonemes in middle childhood extends to other aspects of the speech signal, such as prosody. To investigate prosodic processing, we used stress priming. Spoken stressed and unstressed syllables (primes) preceded spoken German words with stress on the first syllable (targets). We orthogonally varied stress overlap and phoneme overlap between the primes and onsets of the targets. Lexical decisions and Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) for the targets were obtained for pre-reading preschoolers, reading pupils and adults. The behavioral and ERP results were largely comparable across all groups. The fastest responses were observed when the first syllable of the target word shared stress and phonemes with the preceding prime. ERP stress priming and ERP phoneme priming started 200 ms after the target word onset. Bilateral ERP stress priming was characterized by enhanced ERP amplitudes for stress overlap. Left-lateralized ERP phoneme priming replicates previously observed reduced ERP amplitudes for phoneme overlap. Groups differed in the strength of the behavioral phoneme priming and in the late ERP phoneme priming effect. The present results show that enhanced phonological processing in middle childhood is restricted to phonemes and does not extend to prosody. These results are indicative of two parallel processing systems for phonemes and prosody that might follow different developmental trajectories in middle childhood as a function of alphabetic literacy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4042081/ /pubmed/24917838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00530 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schild, Becker and Friedrich. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Schild, Ulrike
Becker, Angelika B. C.
Friedrich, Claudia K.
Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition
title Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition
title_full Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition
title_fullStr Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition
title_short Processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition
title_sort processing of syllable stress is functionally different from phoneme processing and does not profit from literacy acquisition
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24917838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00530
work_keys_str_mv AT schildulrike processingofsyllablestressisfunctionallydifferentfromphonemeprocessinganddoesnotprofitfromliteracyacquisition
AT beckerangelikabc processingofsyllablestressisfunctionallydifferentfromphonemeprocessinganddoesnotprofitfromliteracyacquisition
AT friedrichclaudiak processingofsyllablestressisfunctionallydifferentfromphonemeprocessinganddoesnotprofitfromliteracyacquisition