Cargando…

Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling

BACKGROUND: RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is often used for transcriptome profiling as well as the identification of novel transcripts and alternative splicing events. Typically, RNA-Seq libraries are prepared from total RNA using poly(A) enrichment of the mRNA (mRNA-Seq) to remove ribosomal RNA (rRNA),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Wei, He, Xiaping, Hoadley, Katherine A, Parker, Joel S, Hayes, David Neil, Perou, Charles M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24888378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-419
_version_ 1782322710857121792
author Zhao, Wei
He, Xiaping
Hoadley, Katherine A
Parker, Joel S
Hayes, David Neil
Perou, Charles M
author_facet Zhao, Wei
He, Xiaping
Hoadley, Katherine A
Parker, Joel S
Hayes, David Neil
Perou, Charles M
author_sort Zhao, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is often used for transcriptome profiling as well as the identification of novel transcripts and alternative splicing events. Typically, RNA-Seq libraries are prepared from total RNA using poly(A) enrichment of the mRNA (mRNA-Seq) to remove ribosomal RNA (rRNA), however, this method fails to capture non-poly(A) transcripts or partially degraded mRNAs. Hence, a mRNA-Seq protocol will not be compatible for use with RNAs coming from Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) samples. RESULTS: To address the desire to perform RNA-Seq on FFPE materials, we evaluated two different library preparation protocols that could be compatible for use with small RNA fragments. We obtained paired Fresh Frozen (FF) and FFPE RNAs from multiple tumors and subjected these to different gene expression profiling methods. We tested 11 human breast tumor samples using: (a) FF RNAs by microarray, mRNA-Seq, Ribo-Zero-Seq and DSN-Seq (Duplex-Specific Nuclease) and (b) FFPE RNAs by Ribo-Zero-Seq and DSN-Seq. We also performed these different RNA-Seq protocols using 10 TCGA tumors as a validation set. The data from paired RNA samples showed high concordance in transcript quantification across all protocols and between FF and FFPE RNAs. In both FF and FFPE, Ribo-Zero-Seq removed rRNA with comparable efficiency as mRNA-Seq, and it provided an equivalent or less biased coverage on gene 3′ ends. Compared to mRNA-Seq where 69% of bases were mapped to the transcriptome, DSN-Seq and Ribo-Zero-Seq contained significantly fewer reads mapping to the transcriptome (20-30%); in these RNA-Seq protocols, many if not most reads mapped to intronic regions. Approximately 14 million reads in mRNA-Seq and 45–65 million reads in Ribo-Zero-Seq or DSN-Seq were required to achieve the same gene detection levels as a standard Agilent DNA microarray. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that compared to mRNA-Seq and microarrays, Ribo-Zero-Seq provides equivalent rRNA removal efficiency, coverage uniformity, genome-based mapped reads, and consistently high quality quantification of transcripts. Moreover, Ribo-Zero-Seq and DSN-Seq have consistent transcript quantification using FFPE RNAs, suggesting that RNA-Seq can be used with FFPE-derived RNAs for gene expression profiling. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-419) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4070569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40705692014-06-27 Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling Zhao, Wei He, Xiaping Hoadley, Katherine A Parker, Joel S Hayes, David Neil Perou, Charles M BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is often used for transcriptome profiling as well as the identification of novel transcripts and alternative splicing events. Typically, RNA-Seq libraries are prepared from total RNA using poly(A) enrichment of the mRNA (mRNA-Seq) to remove ribosomal RNA (rRNA), however, this method fails to capture non-poly(A) transcripts or partially degraded mRNAs. Hence, a mRNA-Seq protocol will not be compatible for use with RNAs coming from Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) samples. RESULTS: To address the desire to perform RNA-Seq on FFPE materials, we evaluated two different library preparation protocols that could be compatible for use with small RNA fragments. We obtained paired Fresh Frozen (FF) and FFPE RNAs from multiple tumors and subjected these to different gene expression profiling methods. We tested 11 human breast tumor samples using: (a) FF RNAs by microarray, mRNA-Seq, Ribo-Zero-Seq and DSN-Seq (Duplex-Specific Nuclease) and (b) FFPE RNAs by Ribo-Zero-Seq and DSN-Seq. We also performed these different RNA-Seq protocols using 10 TCGA tumors as a validation set. The data from paired RNA samples showed high concordance in transcript quantification across all protocols and between FF and FFPE RNAs. In both FF and FFPE, Ribo-Zero-Seq removed rRNA with comparable efficiency as mRNA-Seq, and it provided an equivalent or less biased coverage on gene 3′ ends. Compared to mRNA-Seq where 69% of bases were mapped to the transcriptome, DSN-Seq and Ribo-Zero-Seq contained significantly fewer reads mapping to the transcriptome (20-30%); in these RNA-Seq protocols, many if not most reads mapped to intronic regions. Approximately 14 million reads in mRNA-Seq and 45–65 million reads in Ribo-Zero-Seq or DSN-Seq were required to achieve the same gene detection levels as a standard Agilent DNA microarray. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that compared to mRNA-Seq and microarrays, Ribo-Zero-Seq provides equivalent rRNA removal efficiency, coverage uniformity, genome-based mapped reads, and consistently high quality quantification of transcripts. Moreover, Ribo-Zero-Seq and DSN-Seq have consistent transcript quantification using FFPE RNAs, suggesting that RNA-Seq can be used with FFPE-derived RNAs for gene expression profiling. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-419) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4070569/ /pubmed/24888378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-419 Text en © Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Wei
He, Xiaping
Hoadley, Katherine A
Parker, Joel S
Hayes, David Neil
Perou, Charles M
Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling
title Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling
title_full Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling
title_fullStr Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling
title_short Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling
title_sort comparison of rna-seq by poly (a) capture, ribosomal rna depletion, and dna microarray for expression profiling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24888378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-419
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaowei comparisonofrnaseqbypolyacaptureribosomalrnadepletionanddnamicroarrayforexpressionprofiling
AT hexiaping comparisonofrnaseqbypolyacaptureribosomalrnadepletionanddnamicroarrayforexpressionprofiling
AT hoadleykatherinea comparisonofrnaseqbypolyacaptureribosomalrnadepletionanddnamicroarrayforexpressionprofiling
AT parkerjoels comparisonofrnaseqbypolyacaptureribosomalrnadepletionanddnamicroarrayforexpressionprofiling
AT hayesdavidneil comparisonofrnaseqbypolyacaptureribosomalrnadepletionanddnamicroarrayforexpressionprofiling
AT peroucharlesm comparisonofrnaseqbypolyacaptureribosomalrnadepletionanddnamicroarrayforexpressionprofiling