Cargando…

Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince

Nutrient composition data, representative of the retail supply, is required to support labelling and dietetic practice. Because beef mince represents approximately 30% of all beef dishes prepared in Australian households, a national survey of the different types of mince available for purchase in re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fayet-Moore, Flavia, Cunningham, Judy, Stobaus, Tim, Droulez, Veronique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24922174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6062217
_version_ 1782323080638496768
author Fayet-Moore, Flavia
Cunningham, Judy
Stobaus, Tim
Droulez, Veronique
author_facet Fayet-Moore, Flavia
Cunningham, Judy
Stobaus, Tim
Droulez, Veronique
author_sort Fayet-Moore, Flavia
collection PubMed
description Nutrient composition data, representative of the retail supply, is required to support labelling and dietetic practice. Because beef mince represents approximately 30% of all beef dishes prepared in Australian households, a national survey of the different types of mince available for purchase in representative retail outlets was conducted. Sixty-one samples of beef mince from 24 retail outlets in New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia were collected in 2010 and analysed for moisture, protein, total fat and fatty acid profile. A variety of 18 different descriptors were used at point of sale with “Premium” (n = 15) and “Regular” (n = 8) the most commonly used terms. The analysed fat content of “Premium” samples varied from 2.2 g/100 g to 8.0 g/100 g. Forty-eight percent (n = 29) of the samples were categorised as low fat (<5 g/100 g; mean 4.1 g/100 g), 21% as medium fat (5–10 g/100 g; mean 8.9 g/100 g) and 31% as high fat (>10 g/100 g; mean 10.4 g/100 g). There was no significant difference between the types of mince available for purchase in low versus high socio-economic suburbs (Chi-square, p > 0.05). In conclusion, the fat content of the majority of retail beef mince in Australia is <10 g/100 g and a variety of descriptors are used at point of sale, all of which do not necessarily reflect analysed fat content.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4073145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40731452014-06-27 Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince Fayet-Moore, Flavia Cunningham, Judy Stobaus, Tim Droulez, Veronique Nutrients Article Nutrient composition data, representative of the retail supply, is required to support labelling and dietetic practice. Because beef mince represents approximately 30% of all beef dishes prepared in Australian households, a national survey of the different types of mince available for purchase in representative retail outlets was conducted. Sixty-one samples of beef mince from 24 retail outlets in New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia were collected in 2010 and analysed for moisture, protein, total fat and fatty acid profile. A variety of 18 different descriptors were used at point of sale with “Premium” (n = 15) and “Regular” (n = 8) the most commonly used terms. The analysed fat content of “Premium” samples varied from 2.2 g/100 g to 8.0 g/100 g. Forty-eight percent (n = 29) of the samples were categorised as low fat (<5 g/100 g; mean 4.1 g/100 g), 21% as medium fat (5–10 g/100 g; mean 8.9 g/100 g) and 31% as high fat (>10 g/100 g; mean 10.4 g/100 g). There was no significant difference between the types of mince available for purchase in low versus high socio-economic suburbs (Chi-square, p > 0.05). In conclusion, the fat content of the majority of retail beef mince in Australia is <10 g/100 g and a variety of descriptors are used at point of sale, all of which do not necessarily reflect analysed fat content. MDPI 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4073145/ /pubmed/24922174 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6062217 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fayet-Moore, Flavia
Cunningham, Judy
Stobaus, Tim
Droulez, Veronique
Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince
title Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince
title_full Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince
title_fullStr Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince
title_full_unstemmed Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince
title_short Fat Content and Composition in Retail Samples of Australian Beef Mince
title_sort fat content and composition in retail samples of australian beef mince
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24922174
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu6062217
work_keys_str_mv AT fayetmooreflavia fatcontentandcompositioninretailsamplesofaustralianbeefmince
AT cunninghamjudy fatcontentandcompositioninretailsamplesofaustralianbeefmince
AT stobaustim fatcontentandcompositioninretailsamplesofaustralianbeefmince
AT droulezveronique fatcontentandcompositioninretailsamplesofaustralianbeefmince