Cargando…
A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection
High throughput screening technologies such as acoustic droplet ejection (ADE) greatly increase the rate at which X-ray diffraction data can be acquired from crystals. One promising high throughput screening application of ADE is to rapidly combine protein crystals with fragment libraries. In this a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101036 |
_version_ | 1782323862048866304 |
---|---|
author | Cole, Krystal Roessler, Christian G. Mulé, Elizabeth A. Benson-Xu, Emma J. Mullen, Jeffrey D. Le, Benjamin A. Tieman, Alanna M. Birone, Claire Brown, Maria Hernandez, Jesus Neff, Sherry Williams, Daniel Allaire, Marc Orville, Allen M. Sweet, Robert M. Soares, Alexei S. |
author_facet | Cole, Krystal Roessler, Christian G. Mulé, Elizabeth A. Benson-Xu, Emma J. Mullen, Jeffrey D. Le, Benjamin A. Tieman, Alanna M. Birone, Claire Brown, Maria Hernandez, Jesus Neff, Sherry Williams, Daniel Allaire, Marc Orville, Allen M. Sweet, Robert M. Soares, Alexei S. |
author_sort | Cole, Krystal |
collection | PubMed |
description | High throughput screening technologies such as acoustic droplet ejection (ADE) greatly increase the rate at which X-ray diffraction data can be acquired from crystals. One promising high throughput screening application of ADE is to rapidly combine protein crystals with fragment libraries. In this approach, each fragment soaks into a protein crystal either directly on data collection media or on a moving conveyor belt which then delivers the crystals to the X-ray beam. By simultaneously handling multiple crystals combined with fragment specimens, these techniques relax the automounter duty-cycle bottleneck that currently prevents optimal exploitation of third generation synchrotrons. Two factors limit the speed and scope of projects that are suitable for fragment screening using techniques such as ADE. Firstly, in applications where the high throughput screening apparatus is located inside the X-ray station (such as the conveyor belt system described above), the speed of data acquisition is limited by the time required for each fragment to soak into its protein crystal. Secondly, in applications where crystals are combined with fragments directly on data acquisition media (including both of the ADE methods described above), the maximum time that fragments have to soak into crystals is limited by evaporative dehydration of the protein crystals during the fragment soak. Here we demonstrate that both of these problems can be minimized by using small crystals, because the soak time required for a fragment hit to attain high occupancy depends approximately linearly on crystal size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4079544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40795442014-07-08 A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection Cole, Krystal Roessler, Christian G. Mulé, Elizabeth A. Benson-Xu, Emma J. Mullen, Jeffrey D. Le, Benjamin A. Tieman, Alanna M. Birone, Claire Brown, Maria Hernandez, Jesus Neff, Sherry Williams, Daniel Allaire, Marc Orville, Allen M. Sweet, Robert M. Soares, Alexei S. PLoS One Research Article High throughput screening technologies such as acoustic droplet ejection (ADE) greatly increase the rate at which X-ray diffraction data can be acquired from crystals. One promising high throughput screening application of ADE is to rapidly combine protein crystals with fragment libraries. In this approach, each fragment soaks into a protein crystal either directly on data collection media or on a moving conveyor belt which then delivers the crystals to the X-ray beam. By simultaneously handling multiple crystals combined with fragment specimens, these techniques relax the automounter duty-cycle bottleneck that currently prevents optimal exploitation of third generation synchrotrons. Two factors limit the speed and scope of projects that are suitable for fragment screening using techniques such as ADE. Firstly, in applications where the high throughput screening apparatus is located inside the X-ray station (such as the conveyor belt system described above), the speed of data acquisition is limited by the time required for each fragment to soak into its protein crystal. Secondly, in applications where crystals are combined with fragments directly on data acquisition media (including both of the ADE methods described above), the maximum time that fragments have to soak into crystals is limited by evaporative dehydration of the protein crystals during the fragment soak. Here we demonstrate that both of these problems can be minimized by using small crystals, because the soak time required for a fragment hit to attain high occupancy depends approximately linearly on crystal size. Public Library of Science 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4079544/ /pubmed/24988328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101036 Text en © 2014 Cole et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cole, Krystal Roessler, Christian G. Mulé, Elizabeth A. Benson-Xu, Emma J. Mullen, Jeffrey D. Le, Benjamin A. Tieman, Alanna M. Birone, Claire Brown, Maria Hernandez, Jesus Neff, Sherry Williams, Daniel Allaire, Marc Orville, Allen M. Sweet, Robert M. Soares, Alexei S. A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection |
title | A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection |
title_full | A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection |
title_fullStr | A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection |
title_full_unstemmed | A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection |
title_short | A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection |
title_sort | linear relationship between crystal size and fragment binding time observed crystallographically: implications for fragment library screening using acoustic droplet ejection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colekrystal alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT roesslerchristiang alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT muleelizabetha alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT bensonxuemmaj alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT mullenjeffreyd alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT lebenjamina alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT tiemanalannam alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT bironeclaire alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT brownmaria alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT hernandezjesus alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT neffsherry alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT williamsdaniel alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT allairemarc alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT orvilleallenm alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT sweetrobertm alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT soaresalexeis alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT colekrystal linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT roesslerchristiang linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT muleelizabetha linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT bensonxuemmaj linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT mullenjeffreyd linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT lebenjamina linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT tiemanalannam linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT bironeclaire linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT brownmaria linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT hernandezjesus linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT neffsherry linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT williamsdaniel linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT allairemarc linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT orvilleallenm linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT sweetrobertm linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection AT soaresalexeis linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection |