Cargando…

A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection

High throughput screening technologies such as acoustic droplet ejection (ADE) greatly increase the rate at which X-ray diffraction data can be acquired from crystals. One promising high throughput screening application of ADE is to rapidly combine protein crystals with fragment libraries. In this a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cole, Krystal, Roessler, Christian G., Mulé, Elizabeth A., Benson-Xu, Emma J., Mullen, Jeffrey D., Le, Benjamin A., Tieman, Alanna M., Birone, Claire, Brown, Maria, Hernandez, Jesus, Neff, Sherry, Williams, Daniel, Allaire, Marc, Orville, Allen M., Sweet, Robert M., Soares, Alexei S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101036
_version_ 1782323862048866304
author Cole, Krystal
Roessler, Christian G.
Mulé, Elizabeth A.
Benson-Xu, Emma J.
Mullen, Jeffrey D.
Le, Benjamin A.
Tieman, Alanna M.
Birone, Claire
Brown, Maria
Hernandez, Jesus
Neff, Sherry
Williams, Daniel
Allaire, Marc
Orville, Allen M.
Sweet, Robert M.
Soares, Alexei S.
author_facet Cole, Krystal
Roessler, Christian G.
Mulé, Elizabeth A.
Benson-Xu, Emma J.
Mullen, Jeffrey D.
Le, Benjamin A.
Tieman, Alanna M.
Birone, Claire
Brown, Maria
Hernandez, Jesus
Neff, Sherry
Williams, Daniel
Allaire, Marc
Orville, Allen M.
Sweet, Robert M.
Soares, Alexei S.
author_sort Cole, Krystal
collection PubMed
description High throughput screening technologies such as acoustic droplet ejection (ADE) greatly increase the rate at which X-ray diffraction data can be acquired from crystals. One promising high throughput screening application of ADE is to rapidly combine protein crystals with fragment libraries. In this approach, each fragment soaks into a protein crystal either directly on data collection media or on a moving conveyor belt which then delivers the crystals to the X-ray beam. By simultaneously handling multiple crystals combined with fragment specimens, these techniques relax the automounter duty-cycle bottleneck that currently prevents optimal exploitation of third generation synchrotrons. Two factors limit the speed and scope of projects that are suitable for fragment screening using techniques such as ADE. Firstly, in applications where the high throughput screening apparatus is located inside the X-ray station (such as the conveyor belt system described above), the speed of data acquisition is limited by the time required for each fragment to soak into its protein crystal. Secondly, in applications where crystals are combined with fragments directly on data acquisition media (including both of the ADE methods described above), the maximum time that fragments have to soak into crystals is limited by evaporative dehydration of the protein crystals during the fragment soak. Here we demonstrate that both of these problems can be minimized by using small crystals, because the soak time required for a fragment hit to attain high occupancy depends approximately linearly on crystal size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4079544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40795442014-07-08 A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection Cole, Krystal Roessler, Christian G. Mulé, Elizabeth A. Benson-Xu, Emma J. Mullen, Jeffrey D. Le, Benjamin A. Tieman, Alanna M. Birone, Claire Brown, Maria Hernandez, Jesus Neff, Sherry Williams, Daniel Allaire, Marc Orville, Allen M. Sweet, Robert M. Soares, Alexei S. PLoS One Research Article High throughput screening technologies such as acoustic droplet ejection (ADE) greatly increase the rate at which X-ray diffraction data can be acquired from crystals. One promising high throughput screening application of ADE is to rapidly combine protein crystals with fragment libraries. In this approach, each fragment soaks into a protein crystal either directly on data collection media or on a moving conveyor belt which then delivers the crystals to the X-ray beam. By simultaneously handling multiple crystals combined with fragment specimens, these techniques relax the automounter duty-cycle bottleneck that currently prevents optimal exploitation of third generation synchrotrons. Two factors limit the speed and scope of projects that are suitable for fragment screening using techniques such as ADE. Firstly, in applications where the high throughput screening apparatus is located inside the X-ray station (such as the conveyor belt system described above), the speed of data acquisition is limited by the time required for each fragment to soak into its protein crystal. Secondly, in applications where crystals are combined with fragments directly on data acquisition media (including both of the ADE methods described above), the maximum time that fragments have to soak into crystals is limited by evaporative dehydration of the protein crystals during the fragment soak. Here we demonstrate that both of these problems can be minimized by using small crystals, because the soak time required for a fragment hit to attain high occupancy depends approximately linearly on crystal size. Public Library of Science 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4079544/ /pubmed/24988328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101036 Text en © 2014 Cole et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cole, Krystal
Roessler, Christian G.
Mulé, Elizabeth A.
Benson-Xu, Emma J.
Mullen, Jeffrey D.
Le, Benjamin A.
Tieman, Alanna M.
Birone, Claire
Brown, Maria
Hernandez, Jesus
Neff, Sherry
Williams, Daniel
Allaire, Marc
Orville, Allen M.
Sweet, Robert M.
Soares, Alexei S.
A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection
title A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection
title_full A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection
title_fullStr A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection
title_full_unstemmed A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection
title_short A Linear Relationship between Crystal Size and Fragment Binding Time Observed Crystallographically: Implications for Fragment Library Screening Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection
title_sort linear relationship between crystal size and fragment binding time observed crystallographically: implications for fragment library screening using acoustic droplet ejection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101036
work_keys_str_mv AT colekrystal alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT roesslerchristiang alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT muleelizabetha alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT bensonxuemmaj alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT mullenjeffreyd alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT lebenjamina alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT tiemanalannam alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT bironeclaire alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT brownmaria alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT hernandezjesus alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT neffsherry alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT williamsdaniel alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT allairemarc alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT orvilleallenm alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT sweetrobertm alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT soaresalexeis alinearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT colekrystal linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT roesslerchristiang linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT muleelizabetha linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT bensonxuemmaj linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT mullenjeffreyd linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT lebenjamina linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT tiemanalannam linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT bironeclaire linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT brownmaria linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT hernandezjesus linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT neffsherry linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT williamsdaniel linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT allairemarc linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT orvilleallenm linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT sweetrobertm linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection
AT soaresalexeis linearrelationshipbetweencrystalsizeandfragmentbindingtimeobservedcrystallographicallyimplicationsforfragmentlibraryscreeningusingacousticdropletejection