Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study

Restoration of primary teeth continues to be an important facet of restorative dentistry. In comparison to restorations in permanent dentition, the longevity of those in primary teeth is significantly different for all materials. This makes the assessment of these fillings as a separate group meanin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan Das, Usha, Viswanath, Deepak, Azher, Umme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206106
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1024
_version_ 1782324820757708800
author Mohan Das, Usha
Viswanath, Deepak
Azher, Umme
author_facet Mohan Das, Usha
Viswanath, Deepak
Azher, Umme
author_sort Mohan Das, Usha
collection PubMed
description Restoration of primary teeth continues to be an important facet of restorative dentistry. In comparison to restorations in permanent dentition, the longevity of those in primary teeth is significantly different for all materials. This makes the assessment of these fillings as a separate group meaningful. As there is lack of supporting clinical data with regard to the restoration of primary incisors, it would be judicious to consider why this is so and determine if studies can be designed to gain new information. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of composite resins and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations of primary incisors, over a period of one year. Methods: The study group consisted of 40 patients (3½- 5 ½ years of age) with at least one pair of similar sized lesions in the middle1/3 of the same proximal surface of contralateral primary maxillary incisors. Composite resin and resinmodified glass ionomer cement restorations were placed in primary maxillary incisors using split-mouth design. The restorations were evaluated at different intervals of 3,6,9, months and 1 year using Ryge’s criteria. Data obtained was analyzed using Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results revealed no statistical significance in the difference of clinical characteristics between the two restorative materials. Interpretation and conclusion: (1) Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorative materials showed acceptable clinical performance after 1 year in primary teeth. (2) Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorative materials functioned well as class III restorative materials in primary teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40865622014-09-09 Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study Mohan Das, Usha Viswanath, Deepak Azher, Umme Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article Restoration of primary teeth continues to be an important facet of restorative dentistry. In comparison to restorations in permanent dentition, the longevity of those in primary teeth is significantly different for all materials. This makes the assessment of these fillings as a separate group meaningful. As there is lack of supporting clinical data with regard to the restoration of primary incisors, it would be judicious to consider why this is so and determine if studies can be designed to gain new information. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of composite resins and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations of primary incisors, over a period of one year. Methods: The study group consisted of 40 patients (3½- 5 ½ years of age) with at least one pair of similar sized lesions in the middle1/3 of the same proximal surface of contralateral primary maxillary incisors. Composite resin and resinmodified glass ionomer cement restorations were placed in primary maxillary incisors using split-mouth design. The restorations were evaluated at different intervals of 3,6,9, months and 1 year using Ryge’s criteria. Data obtained was analyzed using Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results revealed no statistical significance in the difference of clinical characteristics between the two restorative materials. Interpretation and conclusion: (1) Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorative materials showed acceptable clinical performance after 1 year in primary teeth. (2) Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorative materials functioned well as class III restorative materials in primary teeth. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2009 2009-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4086562/ /pubmed/25206106 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1024 Text en Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohan Das, Usha
Viswanath, Deepak
Azher, Umme
Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study
title Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study
title_full Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study
title_short Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class III Restorations of Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Comparative In Vivo Study
title_sort clinical evaluation of resin composite and resin modified glass ionomer in class iii restorations of primary maxillary incisors: a comparative in vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206106
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1024
work_keys_str_mv AT mohandasusha clinicalevaluationofresincompositeandresinmodifiedglassionomerinclassiiirestorationsofprimarymaxillaryincisorsacomparativeinvivostudy
AT viswanathdeepak clinicalevaluationofresincompositeandresinmodifiedglassionomerinclassiiirestorationsofprimarymaxillaryincisorsacomparativeinvivostudy
AT azherumme clinicalevaluationofresincompositeandresinmodifiedglassionomerinclassiiirestorationsofprimarymaxillaryincisorsacomparativeinvivostudy