Cargando…

Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality

This study was performed to determine the influence of pig breed and gender on the ultimate pH and physicochemical properties of pork. The correlations between pH and pork quality traits directly related to carcass grade, and consumer’s preference were also evaluated. The pH and meat grading scores...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Y. X., Cabling, M. M., Kang, H. S., Kim, T. S., Yeom, S. C., Sohn, Y. G., Kim, S. H, Nam, K. C., Seo, K. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25049866
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12622
_version_ 1782325743953379328
author Li, Y. X.
Cabling, M. M.
Kang, H. S.
Kim, T. S.
Yeom, S. C.
Sohn, Y. G.
Kim, S. H
Nam, K. C.
Seo, K. S.
author_facet Li, Y. X.
Cabling, M. M.
Kang, H. S.
Kim, T. S.
Yeom, S. C.
Sohn, Y. G.
Kim, S. H
Nam, K. C.
Seo, K. S.
author_sort Li, Y. X.
collection PubMed
description This study was performed to determine the influence of pig breed and gender on the ultimate pH and physicochemical properties of pork. The correlations between pH and pork quality traits directly related to carcass grade, and consumer’s preference were also evaluated. The pH and meat grading scores for cold carcasses of 215 purebred pigs (Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire) from four different farms were obtained. Meat quality parameters of the pork loin were analyzed. Duroc and female animals were more affected compared to other breeds and male pigs. Duroc animals had the highest ultimate pH, carcass back fat thickness, marbling scores, yellowness, and fat content (p<0.05). Landrace pigs had the highest color lightness and cooking loss values (p<0.05). Among all trait parameters, marbling scores showed the highest significant differences when evaluating the impact of breed and gender on meat quality characteristics (p<0.001). Ultimate pH was positively correlated with carcass weight (0.20), back fat thickness (0.19), marbling score (0.17), and color score (0.16) while negatively correlated with cooking loss (−0.24) and shear force (−0.20). Therefore, pork samples with lower ultimate pH had lower cooking loss, higher lightness, and higher shear force values irrespective of breed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4093505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40935052014-07-21 Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality Li, Y. X. Cabling, M. M. Kang, H. S. Kim, T. S. Yeom, S. C. Sohn, Y. G. Kim, S. H Nam, K. C. Seo, K. S. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article This study was performed to determine the influence of pig breed and gender on the ultimate pH and physicochemical properties of pork. The correlations between pH and pork quality traits directly related to carcass grade, and consumer’s preference were also evaluated. The pH and meat grading scores for cold carcasses of 215 purebred pigs (Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire) from four different farms were obtained. Meat quality parameters of the pork loin were analyzed. Duroc and female animals were more affected compared to other breeds and male pigs. Duroc animals had the highest ultimate pH, carcass back fat thickness, marbling scores, yellowness, and fat content (p<0.05). Landrace pigs had the highest color lightness and cooking loss values (p<0.05). Among all trait parameters, marbling scores showed the highest significant differences when evaluating the impact of breed and gender on meat quality characteristics (p<0.001). Ultimate pH was positively correlated with carcass weight (0.20), back fat thickness (0.19), marbling score (0.17), and color score (0.16) while negatively correlated with cooking loss (−0.24) and shear force (−0.20). Therefore, pork samples with lower ultimate pH had lower cooking loss, higher lightness, and higher shear force values irrespective of breed. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4093505/ /pubmed/25049866 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12622 Text en Copyright © 2013 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Li, Y. X.
Cabling, M. M.
Kang, H. S.
Kim, T. S.
Yeom, S. C.
Sohn, Y. G.
Kim, S. H
Nam, K. C.
Seo, K. S.
Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality
title Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality
title_full Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality
title_fullStr Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality
title_short Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Different Swine Breeds Meat Quality
title_sort comparison and correlation analysis of different swine breeds meat quality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25049866
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12622
work_keys_str_mv AT liyx comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT cablingmm comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT kanghs comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT kimts comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT yeomsc comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT sohnyg comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT kimsh comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT namkc comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality
AT seoks comparisonandcorrelationanalysisofdifferentswinebreedsmeatquality