Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature

BACKGROUND: Ghostwriting of industry-sponsored articles is unethical and is perceived to be common practice. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review how evidence for the prevalence of ghostwriting is reported in the medical literature. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE via PubMed 1966+, EMBASE 1966+, The Cochrane L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stretton, Serina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25023129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004777

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4120312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25023129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004777

Ejemplares similares