Cargando…

Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Current academic literature suggests that school gardening programmes can provide an interactive environment with the potential to change children’s fruit and vegetable intake. This is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate whether a school gardening pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christian, Meaghan S, Evans, Charlotte EL, Nykjaer, Camilla, Hancock, Neil, Cade, Janet E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7
_version_ 1782331731663126528
author Christian, Meaghan S
Evans, Charlotte EL
Nykjaer, Camilla
Hancock, Neil
Cade, Janet E
author_facet Christian, Meaghan S
Evans, Charlotte EL
Nykjaer, Camilla
Hancock, Neil
Cade, Janet E
author_sort Christian, Meaghan S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current academic literature suggests that school gardening programmes can provide an interactive environment with the potential to change children’s fruit and vegetable intake. This is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate whether a school gardening programme can have an effect on children’s fruit and vegetable intake. METHODS: The trial included children from 23 schools; these schools were randomised into two groups, one to receive the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS)-led intervention and the other to receive the less involved Teacher-led intervention. A 24-hour food diary (CADET) was used to collect baseline and follow-up dietary intake 18 months apart. Questionnaires were also administered to evaluate the intervention implementation. RESULTS: A total of 641 children completed the trial with a mean age of 8.1 years (95% CI: 8.0, 8.4). The unadjusted results from multilevel regression analysis revealed that for combined daily fruit and vegetable intake the Teacher-led group had a higher daily mean change of 8 g (95% CI: −19, 36) compared to the RHS-led group -32 g (95% CI: −60, −3). However, after adjusting for possible confounders this difference was not significant (intervention effect: −40 g, 95% CI: −88, 1; p = 0.06). The adjusted analysis of process measures identified that if schools improved their gardening score by 3 levels (a measure of school gardening involvement - the scale has 6 levels from 0 ‘no garden’ to 5 ‘community involvement’), irrespective of group allocation, children had, on average, a daily increase of 81 g of fruit and vegetable intake (95% CI: 0, 163; p = 0.05) compared to schools that had no change in gardening score. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first cluster randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a school gardening intervention. The results have found very little evidence to support the claims that school gardening alone can improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake. However, when a gardening intervention is implemented at a high level within the school it may improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake by a portion. Improving children’s fruit and vegetable intake remains a challenging task. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11396528 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4142134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41421342014-08-25 Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial Christian, Meaghan S Evans, Charlotte EL Nykjaer, Camilla Hancock, Neil Cade, Janet E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Current academic literature suggests that school gardening programmes can provide an interactive environment with the potential to change children’s fruit and vegetable intake. This is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate whether a school gardening programme can have an effect on children’s fruit and vegetable intake. METHODS: The trial included children from 23 schools; these schools were randomised into two groups, one to receive the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS)-led intervention and the other to receive the less involved Teacher-led intervention. A 24-hour food diary (CADET) was used to collect baseline and follow-up dietary intake 18 months apart. Questionnaires were also administered to evaluate the intervention implementation. RESULTS: A total of 641 children completed the trial with a mean age of 8.1 years (95% CI: 8.0, 8.4). The unadjusted results from multilevel regression analysis revealed that for combined daily fruit and vegetable intake the Teacher-led group had a higher daily mean change of 8 g (95% CI: −19, 36) compared to the RHS-led group -32 g (95% CI: −60, −3). However, after adjusting for possible confounders this difference was not significant (intervention effect: −40 g, 95% CI: −88, 1; p = 0.06). The adjusted analysis of process measures identified that if schools improved their gardening score by 3 levels (a measure of school gardening involvement - the scale has 6 levels from 0 ‘no garden’ to 5 ‘community involvement’), irrespective of group allocation, children had, on average, a daily increase of 81 g of fruit and vegetable intake (95% CI: 0, 163; p = 0.05) compared to schools that had no change in gardening score. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first cluster randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a school gardening intervention. The results have found very little evidence to support the claims that school gardening alone can improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake. However, when a gardening intervention is implemented at a high level within the school it may improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake by a portion. Improving children’s fruit and vegetable intake remains a challenging task. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11396528 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4142134/ /pubmed/25128211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7 Text en © Christian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Christian, Meaghan S
Evans, Charlotte EL
Nykjaer, Camilla
Hancock, Neil
Cade, Janet E
Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
title Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7
work_keys_str_mv AT christianmeaghans evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT evanscharlotteel evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nykjaercamilla evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hancockneil evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cadejanete evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial