Cargando…
Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Current academic literature suggests that school gardening programmes can provide an interactive environment with the potential to change children’s fruit and vegetable intake. This is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate whether a school gardening pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7 |
_version_ | 1782331731663126528 |
---|---|
author | Christian, Meaghan S Evans, Charlotte EL Nykjaer, Camilla Hancock, Neil Cade, Janet E |
author_facet | Christian, Meaghan S Evans, Charlotte EL Nykjaer, Camilla Hancock, Neil Cade, Janet E |
author_sort | Christian, Meaghan S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current academic literature suggests that school gardening programmes can provide an interactive environment with the potential to change children’s fruit and vegetable intake. This is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate whether a school gardening programme can have an effect on children’s fruit and vegetable intake. METHODS: The trial included children from 23 schools; these schools were randomised into two groups, one to receive the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS)-led intervention and the other to receive the less involved Teacher-led intervention. A 24-hour food diary (CADET) was used to collect baseline and follow-up dietary intake 18 months apart. Questionnaires were also administered to evaluate the intervention implementation. RESULTS: A total of 641 children completed the trial with a mean age of 8.1 years (95% CI: 8.0, 8.4). The unadjusted results from multilevel regression analysis revealed that for combined daily fruit and vegetable intake the Teacher-led group had a higher daily mean change of 8 g (95% CI: −19, 36) compared to the RHS-led group -32 g (95% CI: −60, −3). However, after adjusting for possible confounders this difference was not significant (intervention effect: −40 g, 95% CI: −88, 1; p = 0.06). The adjusted analysis of process measures identified that if schools improved their gardening score by 3 levels (a measure of school gardening involvement - the scale has 6 levels from 0 ‘no garden’ to 5 ‘community involvement’), irrespective of group allocation, children had, on average, a daily increase of 81 g of fruit and vegetable intake (95% CI: 0, 163; p = 0.05) compared to schools that had no change in gardening score. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first cluster randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a school gardening intervention. The results have found very little evidence to support the claims that school gardening alone can improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake. However, when a gardening intervention is implemented at a high level within the school it may improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake by a portion. Improving children’s fruit and vegetable intake remains a challenging task. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11396528 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4142134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41421342014-08-25 Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial Christian, Meaghan S Evans, Charlotte EL Nykjaer, Camilla Hancock, Neil Cade, Janet E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Current academic literature suggests that school gardening programmes can provide an interactive environment with the potential to change children’s fruit and vegetable intake. This is the first cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate whether a school gardening programme can have an effect on children’s fruit and vegetable intake. METHODS: The trial included children from 23 schools; these schools were randomised into two groups, one to receive the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS)-led intervention and the other to receive the less involved Teacher-led intervention. A 24-hour food diary (CADET) was used to collect baseline and follow-up dietary intake 18 months apart. Questionnaires were also administered to evaluate the intervention implementation. RESULTS: A total of 641 children completed the trial with a mean age of 8.1 years (95% CI: 8.0, 8.4). The unadjusted results from multilevel regression analysis revealed that for combined daily fruit and vegetable intake the Teacher-led group had a higher daily mean change of 8 g (95% CI: −19, 36) compared to the RHS-led group -32 g (95% CI: −60, −3). However, after adjusting for possible confounders this difference was not significant (intervention effect: −40 g, 95% CI: −88, 1; p = 0.06). The adjusted analysis of process measures identified that if schools improved their gardening score by 3 levels (a measure of school gardening involvement - the scale has 6 levels from 0 ‘no garden’ to 5 ‘community involvement’), irrespective of group allocation, children had, on average, a daily increase of 81 g of fruit and vegetable intake (95% CI: 0, 163; p = 0.05) compared to schools that had no change in gardening score. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first cluster randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate a school gardening intervention. The results have found very little evidence to support the claims that school gardening alone can improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake. However, when a gardening intervention is implemented at a high level within the school it may improve children’s daily fruit and vegetable intake by a portion. Improving children’s fruit and vegetable intake remains a challenging task. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11396528 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4142134/ /pubmed/25128211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7 Text en © Christian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Christian, Meaghan S Evans, Charlotte EL Nykjaer, Camilla Hancock, Neil Cade, Janet E Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children’s fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4142134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christianmeaghans evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT evanscharlotteel evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nykjaercamilla evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hancockneil evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cadejanete evaluationoftheimpactofaschoolgardeninginterventiononchildrensfruitandvegetableintakearandomisedcontrolledtrial |