Cargando…

Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question

In Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 data, we used a 3-stage approach to explore the benefits of pathway analysis in improving a model to predict 2 diastolic blood pressure phenotypes as a function of genetic variation. At stage 1, gene-based tests of association in family data of approximately 800 indiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dufresne, Line, Oualkacha, Karim, Forgetta, Vincenzo, Greenwood, Celia MT
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S103
_version_ 1782332055210688512
author Dufresne, Line
Oualkacha, Karim
Forgetta, Vincenzo
Greenwood, Celia MT
author_facet Dufresne, Line
Oualkacha, Karim
Forgetta, Vincenzo
Greenwood, Celia MT
author_sort Dufresne, Line
collection PubMed
description In Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 data, we used a 3-stage approach to explore the benefits of pathway analysis in improving a model to predict 2 diastolic blood pressure phenotypes as a function of genetic variation. At stage 1, gene-based tests of association in family data of approximately 800 individuals found over 600 genes associated at p<0.05 for each phenotype. At stage 2, networks and enriched pathways were estimated with Cytoscape for genes from stage 1, separately for the 2 phenotypes, then examining network overlap. This overlap identified 4 enriched pathways, and 3 of these pathways appear to interact, and are likely candidates for playing a role in hypertension. At stage 3, using 157 maximally unrelated individuals, partial least squares regression was used to find associations between diastolic blood pressure and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes highlighted by the pathway analyses. However, we saw no improvement in the adjusted cross-validated R(2). Although our pathway-motivated regressions did not improve prediction of diastolic blood pressure, merging gene networks did identify several plausible pathways for hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4144468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41444682014-09-02 Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question Dufresne, Line Oualkacha, Karim Forgetta, Vincenzo Greenwood, Celia MT BMC Proc Proceedings In Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 data, we used a 3-stage approach to explore the benefits of pathway analysis in improving a model to predict 2 diastolic blood pressure phenotypes as a function of genetic variation. At stage 1, gene-based tests of association in family data of approximately 800 individuals found over 600 genes associated at p<0.05 for each phenotype. At stage 2, networks and enriched pathways were estimated with Cytoscape for genes from stage 1, separately for the 2 phenotypes, then examining network overlap. This overlap identified 4 enriched pathways, and 3 of these pathways appear to interact, and are likely candidates for playing a role in hypertension. At stage 3, using 157 maximally unrelated individuals, partial least squares regression was used to find associations between diastolic blood pressure and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in genes highlighted by the pathway analyses. However, we saw no improvement in the adjusted cross-validated R(2). Although our pathway-motivated regressions did not improve prediction of diastolic blood pressure, merging gene networks did identify several plausible pathways for hypertension. BioMed Central 2014-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4144468/ /pubmed/25519357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S103 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dufresne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Dufresne, Line
Oualkacha, Karim
Forgetta, Vincenzo
Greenwood, Celia MT
Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question
title Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question
title_full Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question
title_fullStr Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question
title_full_unstemmed Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question
title_short Pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? That is the question
title_sort pathway analysis for genetic association studies: to do, or not to do? that is the question
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S103
work_keys_str_mv AT dufresneline pathwayanalysisforgeneticassociationstudiestodoornottodothatisthequestion
AT oualkachakarim pathwayanalysisforgeneticassociationstudiestodoornottodothatisthequestion
AT forgettavincenzo pathwayanalysisforgeneticassociationstudiestodoornottodothatisthequestion
AT greenwoodceliamt pathwayanalysisforgeneticassociationstudiestodoornottodothatisthequestion